Skip to main content
Log in

STIR imaging of synthetic vascular graft infection

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nine patients with suspected prosthetic vascular graft infection were studied with axial spin echo (SE) and short T1 inversion recovery (STIR) magnetic resonance imaging. Images were assessed for presence and extent of abnormality. All patients had either surgical (8/9) or bacteriologic (6/9) confirmation of infection. STIR images better defined the extent of infection and had greater fat-fluid contrast than SE images in 6/9 studies. In 3 cases with peri-graft fluid alone. T2-weighted images had slightly greater contrast. STIR imaging can offer improved accuracy in evaluation of suspected prosthetic graft infection when used in conjunction with SE techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vogelzang RL, Limpert JD, Yao JST (1987) Detection of prosthetic vascular complications: Comparison of CT and angiography. AJR 148:819–823

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Low RN, Wall SD, Jeffrey RB, Sollitto RA, Reilly LM, Tierney LM (1990) Aortoenteric fistula and perigraft infection: Evaluation with CT. Radiology 175:157–162.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wolson AH, Kaupp HA, McDonald K (1979) Ultrasound of arterial graft surgery complications. AJR 133:869–875

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yashar JJ, Baxter JC, Burnard RJ, Weyman AK, Yashar J (1979) Ultrasonic investigation of infected vascular prostheses. Int Surg 64(3):51–53

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dries DJ, Alazraki N, Lawrence PF, Murphy KM, Kercher J, Datz FL, Christian P, Taylor A (1985) Detection of acute synthetic vascular graft infection with 111 In-labeled leukocyte scanning: An animal study. AJR 145:1053–1056.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Williamson MR, Boyd CM, Read RC, Thompson BW, Barnes RW, Shah HR, Balachandran S, Ferris EJ (1986) 111 Inlabeled leukocytes in the detection of prosthetic vascular graft infections. AJR 147:173–176

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brunner MC, Mitchell RS, Baldwin JC, James DR, Olcott C, Mehigan JT, McDougall IR, Miller DC (1986) Trosthetic graft infection: Limitations of indium white blood cell scanning. J. Vasc Surg 3:42–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mark AS, McCarthy SM, Moss AA, Price D (1985) Detection of abdominal aortic graft infection: Comparison of CT and In-labled white blood cell scans. AJR 144:315–318

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Justich E, Amparo EG, Hricak H, Higgins CB (1985) Infected aortoiliofemoral grafts: Magnetic resonance imaging. Radiology 154:133–136

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Auffermann W, Olofsson P, Stoney R, Higgins CB (1987) MR imaging of complications of aortic surgery. JCAT 11:982–989

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Olofsson PA, Auffermann W, Higgins CB, Rabahie GN, Tavares N, Stoney RJ (1988) Diagnosis of prosthetic aortic graft infection by magnetic resonance imaging. J Vasc Surg 8:99–105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rubin RH, Fischman AJ, Callahan RJ, Khaw BA, Keech F, Ahmad M, Wilkinson R, Strauss HW (1989) 111-In labeled nonspecific immunoglobulin scanning in the detection of focal infection. NEJM 321:935–940

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Casali RE, Tucker WE, Thompson BW, Read RC (1980) Infected prosthetic graft. Arch Surg 115:577–580

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. O'Hara PJ, Hertzer NR, Beven EG, Krajewski LP (1986) Surgical management of infected abdominal aortic grafts: Review of a 25-year experience. J Vasc Surg 3:725–731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Quinones-Baldrich, WJ, Hernandez JJ, Moore WS (1991) Long-term results following surgical management of aortic graft infection. Arch Surg 126:507–511

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Reilly LM, Altman H, Lusby RJ, Kersh RA, Ehrenfeld WK, Stoney RJ (1984) Late results following surgical management of vascular graft infection. J Vasc Surg 1:36–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dixon WT (1984) Simple proton spectroscopic imaging. Radiology 153:189–194

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Szumowski J, Plewes DB (1987) Separation of lipid and water MR imaging signals by chopper averaging in the time domain. Radiology 165:247–250

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Keller PJ, Hunter WW, Schmalbrock P (1987) Multisection fat-water imaging with chemical shift selective presaturation. Radiology 164:539–541

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Szumowski J, Eisen JK, Vinitski S, Haake PW, Plewes DB (1989) Hybrid methods of chemical-shift imaging. Mag Reson Med 9:379–388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Semelka RC, Chew W, Hricak H, Tomei E, Higgins CB (1990) Fat-saturation MR imaging of the upper abdomen. AJR 155:1111–1116

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mitchell DG, Vinitski S, Saponaro S, Tasciyan T, Burk DL, Rifkin MD (1991) Liver and pancreas: Improved spin-echo T1 contrast by shorter echo time and fat suppression at 1.5 T. Radiology 178:67–71

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schneider E, Glover G (1991) Rapid in vivo proton shimming. Mag Reson Med 18:335–347

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Glover GH, Schneider E (1991) Three-point Dixon technique for true water/fat decomposition with B0 inhomogeneity correction. Mag Reson Med 18:371–383

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mao J, Bidgood WD, Ang PGP, Mancuso A, Yan H (1991) A clinically viable technique of fat suppression for abdomen and pelvis. Mag Reson Med 21:320–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. O'Hara PJ, Borkowski GP, Hertzer NR, O'Donovan PB, Brigham SL, Beven EG (1984) Natural history of periprosthetic air on computerized axial tomographic examination of the abdomen following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 1:429–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Qvarfordt PG, Reilly LM, Mark AS, Goldstone J, Wall SD, Ehrenfeld WK, Stoney RJ (1985) Computerized tomographic assessment of graft incorporation after aortic reconstruction. Am J Surg 150:227–231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Auffermann W, Olofsson PA, Rabahie GN, Tavares NJ, Stoney RJ, Higgins CB (1989) Incorporation versus infection of retroperitoneal aortic grafts: MR imaging features. Radiology 172:359–362

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bradley WG, Waluch V (1985) Blood flow: Magnetic resonance imaging. Radiology 154:443–450

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gulberg GT, Wehrli FW, Shimakawa A, Simons MA (1987) MR vascular imaging with a fast gradient refocusing pulse sequence and reformatted images from transaxial sections. Radiology 165:241–246

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hansen, M.E., Yucel, E.K. & Waltman, A.C. STIR imaging of synthetic vascular graft infection. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 16, 30–36 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02603034

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02603034

Key words

Navigation