Skip to main content
Log in

Prevalence of rubella virus and cytomegalovirus infections in suspected cases of congenital infections

  • Festschrift to Honour Professor O.P. Ghai
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although rubella virus and cytomegalovirus (CMV) are important causes of congenital infections, information on their prevalence in our country is scarce. We studied a total of 249 infants suspected of having congenital infections from January 1988 to September 1989. Serum samples of these infants were tested for rubella and cytomegalovirus specific IgM antibodies by mucapture ELISA. Thirty (12%) infants were positive for rubella IgM antibody, and 50 (20%) had CMV specific IgM antibody. In the group presenting with hepatosplenomegaly (n=56) rubella and CMV specific IgM antibodies were detected in 1 (1.7%) and 25 (44.6%) infants respectively. In the group presenting with congenital malformations (n=90), 23 (25.5%) were positive for rubella, and only 9 (10%) had CMV IgM antibodies. Of the infants presenting with mental retardation (n=39), only CMV infection was detected in 3 (7.7%) infants, whereas amongst the group showing intrauterine growth retardation (n=16), 5 (31.25%) had CMV specific IgM antibodies and 2 (12.5%) had rubella specific IgM antibodies. In the miscellaneous group (n=48), 4 (8.3%) and 8 (16.6%) infants had rubella and CMV IgM antibodies respectively. CMV infection was prevalent in a significantly higher number of children with hepatosplenomegaly than rubella while in infants with congential malformations a significantly higher number had rubella infection. It is concluded that rubella and CMV infections are commonly seen in children with intrauterine infections in our population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. White DO, Fenner F.Congenital and perinatal viral infections in Medical Virology 3rd Ed. London: Academic Press, Inc, 1986: 630–631.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Manjunath N, Balaya S. Serological study on congenital rubella in Delhi.Indian J Med Res 1984; 74: 716–721.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chaturvedi UC, Tripathi BN, Mathur A et al. Role of rubella in congenital malformations in India.J Hyg (Camb) 1973; 76: 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Banatvala JE, Best JM. Rubella. In: Brown and Wilson, Ed.Principles of Bacteriology, Virology and Immunity. 7th Ed. London: Edward Arnold, 1984: 271–302.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pal SR, Chitkara NL, Krech V. Seroepidemiology of CMV infection in and around Chandigarh (Northern India)Indian J Med Res 1972; 60: 973–978.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Onorato IM, Morens DM, Martone WJ, Stansfield SK. Epidemiology of CMV infections: Recommendations for prevention and control.Rev Infect Dis 1985; 7(a): 479–497.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Satapathy G, Balaya S. Diagnosis of intrauterine cytomegalovirus infection by IgM antibody test.Indian J Med Res 1985; 82: 421–426.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Peckham C. Congenital rubella in the United Kingdom before 1970: The prevaccine era.Rev Infect Dis 1985; 7 (Suppl): S-11–S-16.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Broor, S., Kapil, A., Kishore, J. et al. Prevalence of rubella virus and cytomegalovirus infections in suspected cases of congenital infections. Indian J Pediatr 58, 75–78 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02810416

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02810416

Key Words

Navigation