Abstract
Forkhead box (FOX) proteins are members of a conserved family of transcription factors. Pathogenic variants in FOX genes have been shown to be responsible for several human genetic diseases. Here, we have studied the molecular and structural features of germline pathogenic variants in seven FOX proteins involved in Mendelian disorders and compared them with those of variants present in the general population (gnomAD). Our study shows that the DNA-binding domain of FOX proteins is particularly sensitive to damaging variation, although some family members show greater mutational tolerance than others. Next, we set to demonstrate that this tolerance depends on the inheritance mode of FOX-linked disorders. Accordingly, genes whose variants underlie recessive conditions are supposed to have a greater tolerance to variation. This is what we found. As expected, variants responsible for disorders with a dominant inheritance pattern show a higher degree of pathogenicity compared to those segregating in the general population. Moreover, we show that pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants tend to affect mutually exclusive sites with respect to those reported in gnomAD. The former also tend to affect sites with lower solvent exposure and a higher degree of conservation. Our results show the value of using publicly available databases and bioinformatics to gain insights into the molecular and structural bases of disease-causing genetic variation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
Available upon reasonable request.
Code availability
Available upon reasonable request.
References
Apweiler R (2004) UniProt: the Universal Protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res 32:115–119. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh131
Ariani F, Hayek G, Rondinella D et al (2008) FOXG1 is responsible for the congenital variant of Rett syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 83:89–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.05.015
Benayoun BA, Caburet S, Veitia RA (2011a) Forkhead transcription factors: key players in health and disease. Trends Genet 27:224–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2011.03.003
Benayoun BA, Georges AB, L’Hôte D et al (2011b) Transcription factor FOXL2 protects granulosa cells from stress and delays cell cycle: role of its regulation by the SIRT1 deacetylase. Hum Mol Genet 20:1673–1686. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddr042
Berry FB, Tamimi Y, Carle MV et al (2005) The establishment of a predictive mutational model of the forkhead domain through the analyses of FOXC2 missense mutations identified in patients with hereditary lymphedema with distichiasis. Hum Mol Genet 14:2619–2627. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddi295
Beysen D, Moumné L, Veitia R et al (2008) Missense mutations in the forkhead domain of FOXL2 lead to subcellular mislocalization, protein aggregation and impaired transactivation. Hum Mol Genet 17:2030–2038. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddn100
Brown AK, Webb AE (2018) Regulation of FOXO factors in mammalian cells. Curr Top Dev Biol 127:165–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.ctdb.2017.10.006
Carlsson P, Mahlapuu M (2002) Forkhead transcription factors: key players in development and metabolism. Dev Biol 250:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.2002.0780
Chen C-W, Lin M-H, Liao C-C et al (2020) iStable 2.0: Predicting protein thermal stability changes by integrating various characteristic modules. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 18:622–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2020.02.021
Dipietromaria A, Benayoun BA, Todeschini A-L et al (2009) Towards a functional classification of pathogenic FOXL2 mutations using transactivation reporter systems. Hum Mol Genet 18:3324–3333. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddp273
Gajiwala KS, Chen H, Cornille F et al (2000) Structure of the winged-helix protein hRFX1 reveals a new mode of DNA binding. Nature 403:916–921. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002634
Golson ML, Kaestner KH (2016) Fox transcription factors: from development to disease. Development 143:4558–4570. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.112672
Gunning AC, Fryer V, Fasham J, Crosby AH, Ellard S, Baple EL, Wright CF (2020) Assessing performance of pathogenicity predictors using clinically relevant variant datasets. J Med Genet. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-107003
Hamdan FF, Daoud H, Rochefort D et al (2010) De novo mutations in FOXP1 in cases with intellectual disability, autism, and language impairment. Am J Hum Genet 87:671–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.09.017
Hannenhalli S, Kaestner KH (2009) The evolution of Fox genes and their role in development and disease. Nat Rev Genet 10:233–240. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2523
Herman L, Todeschini A-L, Veitia RA (2020) Forkhead transcription factors in health and disease. Trends Genet. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2020.11.003
Heslop JA, Duncan SA (2020) FoxA factors: the chromatin key and doorstop essential for liver development and function. Genes Dev 34:1003–1004. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.340570.120
Horn D, Kapeller J, Rivera-Brugués N et al (2010) Identification of FOXP1 deletions in three unrelated patients with mental retardation and significant speech and language deficits. Hum Mutat 31:E1851-1860. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.21362
Ioannidis NM, Rothstein JH, Pejaver V et al (2016) REVEL: an ensemble method for predicting the pathogenicity of rare missense variants. Am J Human Genet 99:877–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.08.016
Jackson BC, Carpenter C, Nebert DW, Vasiliou V (2010) Update of human and mouse forkhead box (FOX) gene families. Hum Genomics 4:345–352. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-7364-4-5-345
Karczewski KJ, Francioli LC, Tiao G et al (2020) The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature 581(7809):434–443. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2308-7
Landrum MJ, Lee JM, Riley GR et al (2014) ClinVar: public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype. Nucl Acids Res 42:D980–D985. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1113
Le Meur N, Holder-Espinasse M, Jaillard S et al (2010) MEF2C haploinsufficiency caused by either microdeletion of the 5q14.3 region or mutation is responsible for severe mental retardation with stereotypic movements, epilepsy and/or cerebral malformations. J Med Genet 47:22–29. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.2009.069732
Lehmann OJ, Sowden JC, Carlsson P et al (2003) Fox’s in development and disease. Trends Genet 19:339–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9525(03)00111-2
Luo W, Gu L, Li J, Gong Y (2020) Transcriptome sequencing revealed that knocking down FOXL2 affected cell proliferation, the cell cycle, and DNA replication in chicken pre-ovulatory follicle cells. PLoS ONE 15:e0234795. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234795
Myatt SS, Lam EW-F (2007) The emerging roles of forkhead box (Fox) proteins in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 7:847–859. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2223
Obsil T, Obsilova V (2008) Structure/function relationships underlying regulation of FOXO transcription factors. Oncogene 27:2263–2275. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2008.20
Pais FS-M, de Ruy P, Oliveira G, Coimbra R (2014) Assessing the efficiency of multiple sequence alignment programs. Algorithms Mol Biol 9:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7188-9-4
Quinodoz M, Royer-Bertrand B, Cisarova K et al (2017) DOMINO: using machine learning to predict genes associated with dominant disorders. Am J Human Genet 101:623–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.09.001
Roupé KM, Veerla S, Olson J et al (2014) Transcription factor binding site analysis identifies FOXO transcription factors as regulators of the cutaneous wound healing process. PLoS ONE 9:e89274. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089274
Saleem RA, Banerjee-Basu S, Berry FB et al (2003) Structural and functional analyses of disease-causing missense mutations in the forkhead domain of FOXC1. Hum Mol Genet 12:2993–3005. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddg324
Seidman JG, Seidman C (2002) Transcription factor haploinsufficiency: when half a loaf is not enough. J Clin Invest 109:451–455. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI0215043
Stenson PD, Mort M, Ball EV et al (2017) The human gene mutation database: towards a comprehensive repository of inherited mutation data for medical research, genetic diagnosis and next-generation sequencing studies. Hum Genet 136:665–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-017-1779-6
Tavian D, Missaglia S, Maltese PE, et al (2016) FOXC2 disease-mutations identified in lymphedema-distichiasis patients cause both loss and gain of protein function. Oncotarget 7:54228–54239. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.9797
Tavian D, Missaglia S, Michelini S et al (2020) FOXC2 disease mutations identified in lymphedema distichiasis patients impair transcriptional activity and cell proliferation. Int J Mol Sci 21:5112. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21145112
Tien MZ, Meyer AG, Sydykova DK et al (2013) Maximum allowed solvent accessibilites of residues in proteins. PLoS ONE 8:e80635. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080635
Todeschini A-L, Dipietromaria A, L’hôte D et al (2011) Mutational probing of the forkhead domain of the transcription factor FOXL2 provides insights into the pathogenicity of naturally occurring mutations. Hum Mol Genet 20:3376–3385. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddr244
Tuteja G, Kaestner KH (2007a) SnapShot: forkhead transcription factors I. Cell 130:1160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.09.005
Tuteja G, Kaestner KH (2007b) Forkhead transcription factors II. Cell 131:192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.09.016
Vernes SC, Nicod J, Elahi FM et al (2006) Functional genetic analysis of mutations implicated in a human speech and language disorder. Hum Mol Genet 15:3154–3167. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddl392
Waterhouse AM, Procter JB, Martin DMA et al (2009) Jalview version 2—a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics 25:1189–1191. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033
Waterhouse A, Bertoni M, Bienert S et al (2018) SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res 46:W296–W303. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky427
Weigel D, Jürgens G, Küttner F et al (1989) The homeotic gene fork head encodes a nuclear protein and is expressed in the terminal regions of the Drosophila embryo. Cell 57:645–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(89)90133-5
Wiel L, Baakman C, Gilissen D et al (2019) MetaDome: Pathogenicity analysis of genetic variants through aggregation of homologous human protein domains. Human Mutat 40(8):1030–1038. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.23798
Xu D, Zhang Y (2011) Improving the physical realism and structural accuracy of protein models by a two-step atomic-level energy minimization. Biophys J 101:2525–2534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2011.10.024
Yates CM, Filippis I, Kelley LA, Sternberg MJE (2014) SuSPect: enhanced prediction of single amino acid variant (SAV) phenotype using network features. J Mol Biol 426:2692–2701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2014.04.026
Acknowledgments
RAV is supported by CNRS and the University of Paris and by the Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives.
Funding
This work was supported by the University of Paris and by the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
LBG and RAV conceived and designed the study. LBG compiled and analyzed data. RAV analyzed data. LBG and RAV drafted the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors report no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bermúdez-Guzmán, L., Veitia, R.A. Insights into the pathogenicity of missense variants in the forkhead domain of FOX proteins underlying Mendelian disorders. Hum Genet 140, 999–1010 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-021-02267-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-021-02267-2