Skip to main content
Log in

A clinically relevant liver injury grading system by CT, preliminary report

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current computed tomography (CT) grading scales are anatomic and do not reliably identify those liver injuries requiring intervention (surgery or angioembolization). We propose a clinically relevant CT grading system that could predict need for intervention. CT scans of 11 patients with hepatic injury were reviewed to establish criteria that correspond with intervention. Five features were identified that were associated with intervention: laceration in greater than or equal to three segments, laceration extending into the hilum, hemoperitoneum, active extravasation, and sentinel clot. Radiologists then evaluated the predictability of these criteria by analyzing 24 CT scans. Inter-observer agreement of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grading system was compared to this new system. In the analysis of 24 CT scans, active extravasation and sentinel clot demonstrated the highest specificity for intervention. This new grading system had superior inter-observer agreement (k=0.56) as compared to the AAST grading system (k=0.47). Active extravasation and the presence of sentinel clot should form the foundation of a new liver grading system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moore EE, Shackford SR, Pachter HL, McAninch JW, Browner BD, Champion HR et al (1989) Organ injury scaling: spleen, liver, and kidney. J Trauma 29:1664–1666

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Moore EE, Cogbill TH, Jurkovich GJ, Shackford SR, Malangoni MA, Champion HR (1995) Organ injury scaling: spleen and liver (1994 revision). J Trauma 38:323–324

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mirvis SE, Whitley NO, Vainwright JR, Gens DR (1989) Blunt hepatic trauma in adults: CT-based classification and correlation with prognosis and treatment. Radiology 171:27–32

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Croce MA, Fabian TC, Kudsk KA, Baum SL, Payne LW, Mangiante EC, et al (1991) AAST organ injury scale: correlation of CT-graded liver injuries and operative findings. J Trauma 31:806–812

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Durham RM, Buckley J, Keegan M, Fravell S, Shapiro MJ, Mazuski J (1992) Management of blunt hepatic injuries. Am J Surg 164:477–481

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Becker CD, Gal I, Baer HU, Vock P (1996) Blunt hepatic trauma in adults: correlation of CT injury grading with outcome. Radiology 201:215–220

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tarhan NC, Chung CB, Mohana-Borges AV, Hughes T, Resnick D (2004) Meniscal tears: role of axial MRI alone and in combination with other imaging planes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:9–15

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fang JF, Chen RJ, Wong YC, Lin BC, Hsu YB, Kao JL et al (2000) Classification and treatment of pooling of contrast material on computed tomographic scan of blunt hepatic trauma. J Trauma 49:1083–1088

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felipe Munera.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MacLean, A.A., Durso, A., Cohn, S.M. et al. A clinically relevant liver injury grading system by CT, preliminary report. Emerg Radiol 12, 34–37 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-005-0441-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-005-0441-0

Keywords

Navigation