Abstract
The study of subjective quality of life and its connotations in the People’s Republic of China is at a preliminary stage. Although there is an emerging body of literature on this topic, there are few datasets representative of the general public, particularly in Mainland China. This paper reports the findings of a public survey (N = 449) conducted in Zhuhai City, South China using the International Wellbeing Index (IWI). There were four main aims: (1) to judge whether residents were satisfied with their lives; (2) to compare the data with recent findings from Hong Kong and Macau; (3) to investigate the equivalence of the IWI in terms of its psychometric properties; and (4) to determine the applicability of the ‘Theory of Homeostasis Wellbeing’. The data indicated a moderate level of personal (PWI score = 64.4.) and national (NWI score = 57.4) wellbeing, consistent with recent findings from Hong Kong and Macau. The PWI score was within the normative range for non-Western countries, which indicates that the residents were, on the whole, satisfied with their lives. Although previously reported objective measures of quality of life in Zhuhai are lower than in Hong Kong and Macau, this is not reflected in this study’s subjective measures. This finding was interpreted in terms of the ‘Theory of Subjective Wellbeing Homeostasis’, and the specific situation in Zhuhai, as there seems to be an absence of factors (i.e., no harsh economic or social situation) which could drive subjective wellbeing below normal. Last, that the IWI demonstrated good psychometric performance in terms of its reliability, validity, and sensitivity, and concurred with previous published reports, it seems that the scale’s robustness generalises to Chinese samples.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Biswas-Diener, R., Vittersø, J., & Diener, E. (2005). Most people are pretty happy, but there is cultural variation: The Inughuit, the Amish, and the Maasai. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 205–226. doi:10.1007/s10902-005-5683-8.
Chen, Z., & Davey, G. (2008a). Happiness and subjective wellbeing in Mainland China. Journal of Happiness Studies. doi:10.1007/s10902-008-9092-7.
Chen, Z., & Davey, G. (2008b). Normative life satisfaction in Chinese societies. Social Indicators Research. doi:10.1007/s11205-008-9250-7.
Cummins, R. (1995). On the trail of the gold standard for subjective wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 35, 179–200. doi:10.1007/BF01079026.
Cummins, R. (1996). The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos. Social Indicators Research, 38, 303–332. doi:10.1007/BF00292050.
Cummins, R. (1998). A second approximation to an international standard for life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 43, 307–334. doi:10.1023/A:1006831107052.
Cummins, R., & Nistico, H. (2002). Maintaining life satisfaction: The role of positive cognitive bias. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 37–69. doi:10.1023/A:1015678915305.
Cummins, R. A., McCabe, M. P., Romeo, Y., & Gullone, E. (1994). The comprehensive quality of life scale: Instrument development and psychometric evaluation on tertiary staff and students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 372–382. doi:10.1177/0013164494054002011.
Cummins, R., Woerner, J., Tomyn, A., Gibson, A., & Knapp, T. (2007). Australian unity wellbeing index survey 17. Australia: School of Psychology, Deakin University.
Davey, G., Chen, Z., & Lau, A. (2007). Peace in a thatched hut—that is happiness: Subjective wellbeing among peasants in rural China. Journal of Happiness Studies. doi:10.1007/s10902-007-9078-x.
Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2002). Will money increase subjective well-being? A literature review and guide to needed research. Social Indicators Research, 57, 119–169. doi:10.1023/A:1014411319119.
Diener, E., & Diener, C. (1996). Most people are happy. Psychological Science, 7, 181–185. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00354.x.
Gill, W. (1984). Monitoring the subjective well-being of chronically ill patients over time. Community Health Studies, 8, 288–296.
Goldings, H. (1954). On the avowal and projection of happiness. Journal of Personality, 23, 30–47. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1954.tb02336.x.
Huang, l., & Xing, Z. (2005). An initial research on the wellbeing index applied to citizens in China. Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science, 114(5), 464–465.
International Wellbeing Group. (2006). Personal wellbeing index. Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University.
Lau, A., Cummins, R., & McPherson, W. (2005). An investigation into the cross-cultural equivalence of the Personal Wellbeing Index. Social Indicators Research, 75, 403–430. doi:10.1007/s11205-004-0561-z.
Macau Inter-University Institute. (2007). Macau quality of life report 4. Macau: Macau Inter-University Institute.
McGillivray, J., Lau, A., Cummins, R., & Davey, G. The utility of the ‘Personal Wellbeing Index—Intellectual Disability Scale (PWI-ID)’ in an Australian sample. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities (in press).
Park, J. (1997). The special economic zones of China and their impact on its economic development. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
Shek, D. T. L., Chan, Y. K., & Lee, P. (Eds.). (2005a). Social indicators research series: Quality of life research in Chinese, Western and global contexts (Vol. 25). The Netherlands: Springer.
Shek, D. T. L., Chan, Y. K., & Lee, P. S. N. (2005b). Quality of life in the global context: A Chinese response. Social Indicators Research, 71(1–3), 1–10. doi:10.1007/s11205-004-8035-x.
Tiliouine, H., Cummins, R., & Davern, M. (2006). Measuring wellbeing in developing countries: The case of Algeria. Social Indicators Research, 75, 1–30. doi:10.1007/s11205-004-2012-2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, Z., Davey, G. Subjective Quality of Life in Zhuhai City, South China: A Public Survey Using the International Wellbeing Index. Soc Indic Res 91, 243–258 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9280-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9280-1