Skip to main content
Log in

Prognostic Factors for Luminal B-like Breast Cancer

  • Published:
Current Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This study aimed to examine the prognostic factors of luminal B-like breast cancer. Clinical data of 695 luminal B-like breast cancer patients who had been treated in our hospital during the period of past 4.5 years were collected and analyzed. Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), antigen identified by monoclonal antibody Ki-67 (Ki67) were immunohistochemically detected. Different cutoffs of ER, PgR, and Ki67 were evaluated. Pearson χ2 test was performed to compare categorical parameters. Univariate and multivariate models were used to evaluate predictors of disease free survival (DFS). The results showed that patients who were younger, and had larger tumors, and more positive lymph nodes were more likely to receive neo-adjuvent chemotherapy (NAC). Patients with ER-positive tumors having <10% positive cells received more anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy and less endocrine therapy than those with ER-positive tumors having ≥10% positive cells (P=0.004 and P=0.007, respectively); however, patients with ER-positive tumors having <10% positive cells experienced more recurrence (P<0.001). PgR expression levels were not associated with therapeutic schedule and DFS. Patients with tumor tissue Ki67 score ≥30% received more anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy and had worse DFS than those with tumor tissue Ki67 score <30%. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that clinical T stage, lymph nodes, ER, Ki67, and HER2 status were independent prognostic factors. In conclusion, ER-positive rate <10% and Ki67 score ≥30%, similar to higher clinical T stage, more metastatic lymph nodes, and HER2 positive status, may indicate a worse prognosis for luminal B-like breast cancer patients. Multi-center prospective trials with larger sample sizes are necessary for the continued perfection of our work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goldhirsch A, Winer EP, Coates AS, et al. Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013. Ann Oncol, 2013,24(9):2206–2223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Dowsett M, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College Of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2010,28(16):2784–2795

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Viale G, Regan MM, Maiorano E, et al. Chemoendocrine compared with endocrine adjuvant therapies for node-negative breast cancer: predictive value of centrally reviewed expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors—International Breast Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol, 2008,26(9):1404–1410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Viale G, Regan MM, Maiorano E, et al. Prognostic and predictive value of centrally reviewed expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors in a randomized trial comparing letrozole and tamoxifen adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal early breast cancer: BIG 1–98. J Clin Oncol, 2007,25(25):3846–3852

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Prat A, Cheang MC, Martin M, et al. Prognostic significance of progesterone receptor-positive tumor cells within immunohistochemically defined luminal A breast cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2013,31(2):203–209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Purdie CA, Quinlan P, Jordan LB, et al. Progesterone receptor expression is an independent prognostic variable in early breast cancer: a population-based study. Br J Cancer, 2014,110(3):565–572

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dunnwald LK, Rossing MA, Li CI. Hormone receptor status, tumor characteristics, and prognosis: a prospective cohort of breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res, 2007,9(1):R6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Denkert C, Budczies J, von Minckwitz G, et al. Strategies for developing Ki67 as a useful biomarker in breast cancer. Breast, 2015,24 suppl2:S67–S72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Polley MY, Leung SC, Gao D, et al. An international study to increase concordance in Ki67 scoring. Modern pathology, 2015,28(6):778–786

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Polley MY, Leung SC, McShane LM, et al. An international Ki67 reproducibility study. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2013,105(24):1897–1906

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ades F, Zardavas D, Bozovic-Spasojevic I, et al. Luminal B breast cancer: molecular characterization, clinical management, and future perspectives. J Clin Oncol, 2014,32(25):2794–2803

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yuan JQ, Wang SM, Tang LL, et al. Relative dose intensity and therapy efficacy in different breast cancer molecular subtypes: a retrospective study of early stage breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2015,151(2):405–413

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fan C, Oh DS, Wessels L, et al. Concordance among gene-expression-based predictors for breast cancer. N Engl J Med, 2006,355(6):560–569

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Paik S, Tang G, Shak S, et al. Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2006,24(23):3726–3734

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. de Ronde JJ, Hannemann J, Halfwerk H, et al. Concordance of clinical and molecular breast cancer subtyping in the context of preoperative chemotherapy response. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2010,119(1):119–126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Esserman LJ, Berry DA, Cheang MC, et al. Chemotherapy response and recurrence-free survival in neoadjuvant breast cancer depends on biomarker profiles: results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL (CALGB 150007/150012; ACRIN 6657). Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2012,132(3):1049–1062

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lips EH, Mulder L, de Ronde JJ, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER+ HER2- breast cancer: response prediction based on immunohistochemical and molecular characteristics. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2012,131(3):827–836

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lv M, Li B, Li Y, et al. Predictive role of molecular subtypes in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients in Northeast China. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2011,12(9):2411–2417

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS, et al. Strategies for subtypes—dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011. Ann Oncol, 2011,22(8):1736–1747

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Prabhu JS, Korlimarla A, Desai K, et al. A Majority of Low (1-10%) ER Positive Breast Cancers Behave Like Hormone Receptor Negative Tumors. J Cancer, 2014,5(2):156–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Yi M, Huo L, Koenig KB, et al. Which threshold for ER positivity? a retrospective study based on 9639 patients. Ann Oncol, 2014,25(5):1004–1011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG), Davies C, Godwin J, et al. Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet, 2011,378(9793): 771–784

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Dowsett M, Allred C, Knox J, et al. Relationship between quantitative estrogen and progesterone receptor expression and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) status with recurrence in the Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination trial. J Clin Oncol, 2008,26(7):1059–1065

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stuart-Harris R, Caldas C, Pinder SE, et al. Proliferation markers and survival in early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 85 studies in 32,825 patients. Breast, 2008,17(4):323–334

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Coates AS, Winer EP, Goldhirsch A, et al. Tailoring therapies—improving the management of early breast cancer: St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2015. Ann Oncol, 2015,26(8):1533–1546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Li J, Zhang BN, Fan JH, et al. A nation-wide multicenter 10-year (1999-2008) retrospective clinical epidemiological study of female breast cancer in China. BMC Cancer, 2011,11:364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhi Xiao.

Additional information

This work was supported by the Youth Teacher Boosting Project of Central South University (No. 2012QNZT097).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ding, Nh., Liu, Cf., Hu, C. et al. Prognostic Factors for Luminal B-like Breast Cancer. CURR MED SCI 39, 396–402 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-019-2049-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-019-2049-8

Key words

Navigation