Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

TTK Chitra tilting disc valve: Hemodynamic evaluation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aim of study

The TTK Chitra mechanical heart valve is being widely used in India. We present a hemodynamic study of this valve implanted in the mitral and aortic positions.

Methods

547 patients had 654 valves implanted in the aortic and/or mitral positions. 230 patients underwent an echocardiography examination with Doppler evaluation, for estimating the effective orifice area and transvalvular gradients.

Results

In the mitral position, for valve sizes 25, 27 and 29 mm, the mean gradients (in mm Hg) are 5±3, 4±2 and 4±2, and the Effective orifice areas (in cm2) are 2.8±0.8, 3.1±0.7 and 2.9±0.7 respectively. In the aortic position, for valve sizes 21 and 23 mm, the gradients (in mm Hg) are 10±5 and 9±4, and the Effective orifice areas (in cm2) are 1.5±0.5 and 1.8±0.3 respectively.

Conclusions

The TTK Chitra valve is hemodynamically comparable to other mechanical valves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bhuvaneshwar GS, Muraleedharan CV, Arthun Vijayan C, Sankar kumar R, Valiathan MS, Development of the Chitra tilting disc heart valve prosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis 1996; 5: 448–58.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shekhar Rao, Kurian VM, Ghosh M, Sankar kumar R, Mohansingh MP, Valiathan MS. Clinical course after mitral valve replacement. Indian Heart J 1990; 42: 335–39.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Krishna Manohar SS, Valiathan, Sankar Kumar, Balakrishnan Venkitachalam, GS Bhuvaneshwar, Experience with the Chitra prosthetic valve: Early results of Clinical trial. Indian J of Thorac and Cardiovasc Surg 1991; 7: 105–08.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sankarkumar R, Bhuvaneshwar GS, Magotra MS et al. Chitra Heart valve: Results of a multicentre clinical study. J Heart Valve Dis 2001; 10: 5: 619–27.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Edmunds LH Jr, Clark RE, Cohn LH et al. Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 112: 708–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Grunkemeir GL, Li HH, Naftel DC et al. Long-term performance of heart valve prostheses. Curr Probl Cardiol 2000; 25: 73–156.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Butchart EG, Li HH, Payne N. Twenty years experience with the Medtronic hall valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 121: 1090–100.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jamieson WRE, Miyagishima RT, Grunkemier GL, et al. Bileaflet mechanical prostheses performance in mitral position. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999; 15: 786–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rahimtoola SH: The problem of valve prosthesis-Patient mismatch. Circulation 1978: 58: 20–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Currie PJ, Stewart JB, Reeder GS et al. Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of calcific aortic stenosis, A simultaneous Doppler, catheter correlative study in 100 adult patients. Circulation 1985; 71: 1162–66.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Soo CS, Ca M, Tay M, Yeoh JK, Sim E, Choo M. Echocardiographic assessment of Carbomedics prosthetic valves in mitral position. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1994; 7: 159–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Panidis I P, Ross J, Mintz GS. Normal and abnormal prosthetic valve function as assessed by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986; 8: 317–26.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Reisner SA, Meltser RS. Normal values of prosthetic echocardiographic parameters: a review. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1988; 1: 201–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vongpatasin W, Hills LD et al. Prosthetic heart valves. N Engl J Med 1996; 335:407–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nagarajan M, Muraleedharan, Chandrasekhar P, The TTK Chitra heart valve—A single center experience with midterm results Ind. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 16: 85–89.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Holen J, Aaslid R, Landmark K, Simonsen Severe, Ostrem T. Determination of effective orifice area in mitral stenosis from non-invasive ultrasound Doppler data and mitral flow rate. Acta Med Scand. 1977; 200: 83–89 (A).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hatle L, Angelson B, Transdol A. A non-invasive assessment of atrioventricular pressure half-time by Doppler ultrasound. Circulation 1979; 60: 1096–99.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Edmunds Henry L, Cohn Lawrence. Mechanical and bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement. Chapter 34. Cardiac surgery in Adults, 2nd Edition. The McGraw Hill companies Inc.

  19. Edmunds Henry L, Cohn Lawrence. Mechanical and bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement. Chapter 29. Cardiac surgery in Adults. 2nd Edition. The McGraw Hill companies Inc.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pawan Kumar M.Ch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kumar, P., Dalvi, B., Chikkatur, R. et al. TTK Chitra tilting disc valve: Hemodynamic evaluation. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20, 117–121 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-004-0060-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-004-0060-5

Key words

Navigation