Skip to main content
Log in

From attitudes to behaviour: Basic and applied research on the theory of planned behaviour

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present article traces the development of the theory of planned behaviour, from early research on the attitude-behaviour relationship through the theory of reasoned action. In particular, it is argued that a perceived lack of correspondence between attitude and behaviour led to examination of variables that either moderated (e.g., attitude strength, measurement correspondence) or mediated (behavioural intention) the relationship between attitudes and behaviour. Several meta-analytic reviews provide strong empirical support for the theory of planned behaviour, yet several applied and basic issues need to be resolved. The six papers that make up the remainder of this special issue address several of these issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality and behaviour. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behaviour relations: a theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In C. Murchison (Ed.), A handbook of social psychologyn (pp. 798–844). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2000). Social cognition models and health behaviour: A structured review. Psychology and Health, 15, 173–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A metaanalytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–499.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2002). Reducing fat intake: Interventions based on the theory of planned behaviour. In D. Rutter & L. Quine (Eds.), Changing health behaviour: Intervention and research with social cognition models (pp. 87–104). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christian, J., & Armitage, C.J. (2002). Attitudes and intentions of homeless persons towards service provision in South Wales. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 219–231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conner, M., & Armitage, C. J. (1998). Extending the theory of planned behaviour: A review and avenues for further research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1429–1464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner, M., Sheeran, P., Norman, P., & Armitage, C. J. (2000). Temporal stability as a moderator of relationships in the theory of planned behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 469–493.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conner, M., & Sparks, P. (2002). Ambivalence and attitudes. European Review of Social Psychology, 12, 37–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corey, S. M. (1937). Professed attitudes and actual behaviour. Journal of Educational Psychology, 28, 271–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, A. R., & Jaccard, J. J. (1979). Variables that moderate the attitude-behaviour relation: Results of a longitudinal survey. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1364–1376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M. (1967a). Attitude and the prediction of behaviour. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Readings in attitude theory and measurement (pp. 477–492). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M. (1967b). A behaviour theory approach to the relations between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward the object. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Readings in attitude theory and measurement (pp. 389–400). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M, & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godin, G., & Kok, G. (1996). The theory of planned behaviour: A review of its applications to healthrelated behaviours. American Journal of Health Promotion, 11, 87–98.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kokkinaki, F., & Lunt, P. (1998). The relationship between involvement, attitude accessibility and attitudebehaviour consistency. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 497–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, S. J. (1995). Attitudes and the prediction of behaviour: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 58–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krosnick, J. A., Boninger, D. S., Chuang, Y. C., Berent, M. K., & Carnot, C. G. (1993). Attitude strength: One construct or many related constructs? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1132–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaPiere, R. T. (1934). Attitudes vs. actions. Social Forces, 13, 230–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maio, G. R., & Olson, J. M. (2000). Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheeran, P. (2002). Intention-behaviour relations: A conceptual and empirical review. European Review of Social Psychology, 12, 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P. R. (1988). The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 325–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, S. (1998). Explaining and predicting intentions and behaviour: How well are we doing? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1318–1339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen, C. J., Borgida, E., & Lavine, H. (1995). The causes and consequences of personal involvement. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 191–214). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Putte, B. (1991). Twenty years of the theory of reasoned action of Fishbein and Ajzen: A metaanalysis. Unpublished manuscript, University of Amsterdam.

  • Wicker, A. W. (1969). Attitudes versus actions: The relationship of verbal and overt behavioural responses to attitude objects. Journal of Social Issues, 25, 41–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Armitage, C.J., Christian, J. From attitudes to behaviour: Basic and applied research on the theory of planned behaviour. Curr Psychol 22, 187–195 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-003-1015-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-003-1015-5

Keywords

Navigation