Skip to main content
Log in

How to Interpret the Coefficients of Spatial Models: Spillovers, Direct and Indirect Effects

  • Published:
Spatial Demography Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper briefly reviews how to derive and interpret coefficients of spatial regression models, including topics of direct and indirect (spatial spillover) effects. These topics have been addressed in the spatial econometric literature over the past 5–6 years, but often at a level sometimes difficult for students new to the field. Our goal is to overcome this handicap by carefully presenting the mathematics behind these spatial effects and clearly illustrating how they work using two small fictive datasets and one large dataset with real data. The motivation for the paper is primarily pedagogical. Theoretical and conceptual impediments associated with the application of procedures are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The two parts of the SAC model are represented here as using the same weights matrix, W. This is a matter of notational convenience and not a requirement of the model. Different W matrices can be used without altering the point of the example.

References

  • Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Corrado, L., & Fingleton, B. (2012). Where is the economics in spatial econometrics? Journal of Regional Science, 52(2), 210–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elhorst, J. P. (2010). Applied spatial econometrics: Raising the bar. Spatial Economic Analysis, 5(1), 9–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, S., & Overman, H. G. (2012). Mostly pointless spatial econometrics? Journal of Regional Science, 52(2), 172–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, D. A., & Arbia, G. (2010). Detecting negative spatial autocorrelation in georeferenced random variables. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24(3), 417–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R., Moffat, J., & Kravtsova, V. (2011). In search of ‘W’. Spatial Economic Analysis, 6(3), 249–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hondroyiannis, G., Kelejian, H., & Tavlas, (2009). Spatial aspects of contagion among emerging economies. Spatial Economic Analysis, 4(2), 191–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelejian, H., & Mukerji, P. (2011). Important dynamic indices in spatial models. Papers in Regional Science, 90(4), 693–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelejian, H., Murrel, P., & Shepotylo, O. (2013). Spatial spillovers in the development of institutions. Journal of Developing Economics, 101, 297–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelejian, H. H., & Prucha, I. R. (1998). A generalized spatial two-stage least squares procedure for estimating a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 17(1), 99–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, D., & LeSage, J. P. (2009). Changes in commuting to work times over the 1990 to 2000 period. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39(4), 460–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leenders, R. T. A. J. (2002). Modeling social influence through network autocorrelation: Constructing the weight matrix. Social Networks, 24(1), 21–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeSage, J. P., & Dominguez, M. (2012). The importance of modeling spatial spillovers in public choice analysis. Public Choice, 150, 525–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeSage, J. P., & Pace, R. K. (2009). Introduction to spatial econometrics. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis Group.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • LeSage, J. P., & Pace, R. K. (2011). Pitfalls in higher order model extensions of basic spatial regression methodology. The Review of Regional Studies, 41, 13–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manski, C. (1993). Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. The Review of Economic Studies, 60(3), 531–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, M., Boarnet, M., Brakman, S., & Ottaviano, G. (2012). Introduction: Whither spatial econometrics? Journal of Regional Science, 52(2), 167–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piras, G., & Lozano-Gracia, N. (2012). Spatial J-test: Some Monte Carlo evidence. Statistics and Computing, 22(1), 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stakhovych, S., & Bijmolt, T. H. A. (2009). Specification of spatial models: A simulation study on weights matrices. Papers in Regional Science, 88, 389–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolnay, S. E., Deane, G., & Beck, E. M. (1996). Vicarious violence: Spatial effects on southern lynchings, 1890–1919. The American Journal of Sociology, 102(3), 788–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss, P. R., Long, D. D., Hammer, R. B., & Friedman, S. (2006). County child poverty rates in the U.S.: A spatial regression approach. Population Research and Policy Review, 25(4), 369–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, M., & Gleditsch, K. (2007). An introduction to spatial regression models in the social sciences (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences). Thousand Oaks: Sage. 155.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul R. Voss.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Golgher, A.B., Voss, P.R. How to Interpret the Coefficients of Spatial Models: Spillovers, Direct and Indirect Effects. Spat Demogr 4, 175–205 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40980-015-0016-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40980-015-0016-y

Keywords

Navigation