Skip to main content
Log in

The Competency of Clinical Research Coordinators: The Importance of Education and Experience

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The organization and operation of clinical trials have become increasingly complex requiring the coordination of a well-trained workforce to ensure that complicated protocols yield valid results that will advance human health. We hypothesized that formal education in clinical research is equivalent to a number of years of work experience as a clinical research professional in terms of self-perceived clinical research competence.

Methods

Using REDCap, we conducted a survey of students and recent graduates from academic programs in clinical research in the USA using the CICRP index that consists of 20 clinical research core competencies. We compared the responses of recent graduates to CRCs wording in the USA and Canada in various research settings who responded to a similar survey conducted by the Joint Task Force and to experienced CRCs working at research-intensive CTSA hubs and their affiliated hospitals who were surveyed as part of the NIH funded DIAMOND project.

Results

We found that the degree of self-perceived competence to perform advanced core competencies such as those related to regulatory affairs among new graduates of formal academic programs without research experience to be equivalent to as many as five years of on-the-job-training in a research-intensive CTSA setting and more than ten years of experience in less research-intensive community settings.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that scores on both forms of the CICRP differentiate CRCs according to formal education in clinical research, years of experience as a CRC and type of research setting in which they work. Further, the self-perceived competency assessed by CICRP acquired by completing an academic program in clinical research is equivalent to years of work experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fordyce CB, Roe MT, Pierre C, Hinkley T, Hamre G, Taenaerts P, et al. Trends in clinical trial investigator workforce and turnover: An analysis of the U.S. FDA 1572 BMIS database. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019;15:1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development. Impact Report. High Turnover and protocol noncompliance continue to plague the global investigative site landscape. Volume 17. Boston, MA: Tufts University; 2015.

  3. Benner P. From Novice to Expert: Excellence and Power in Clinical Nursing Practice. Menlo Park: Addison-Wesley; 1984.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Fennimore L, Wolf G. Nurse manager leadership development: Leveraging the evidence and system-level support. J Nurs Admin. 2011;41(5):204–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dale JC, Drews B, Dimmitt P, Hildebrandt E, Hittle K, Tielsch-Goddard A. Novice to expert: The evolution of an advanced practice evaluation tool. J Pediatr Healthcare. 2013;27(3):195–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Titzer JL, Shirey MR, Hauck S. A nurse manager succession planning model with associated empirical outcomes. J Nurs Admin. 2014;44(1):37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. National Library of Medicine. clinicaltrials.gov Washington, DC: National Library of Medicine; 2020 [July 16, 2020].https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=Covid19&term=&cntry=US&state=&city=&dist= .

  8. Mullikin E, Bakken LL, Betz NE. Assessing the research self-efficacy in physician scientists: The clinical research appraisal inventory. J Clin Assess. 2007;88(9):1340–5.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lipira L, Jeffe DB, Krauss M, Garbutt J, Piccirillo J, Evanoff B, et al. Evaluation of clinical research training programs. Clin Transl Sci. 2010;3(5):243–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Robinson G, Moore C, McTigue K, Rubio D, Kapoor W. Assessing competencies in a master of science in clinical research program: The comprehensive competency review. Clin Transl Sci. 2015;8:7770–5.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Eller LS, Lev EL, Bakken LL. Development and testing of the Clinical Research Apraisal Inventory-Short Form. J Nurs Meas. 2014;22(1):106–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hornung C, Jones C, Calvin-Naylor NA, Kerr J, Sonstein S, Hinkley T, et al. Competency indices to assess the knowledge, skills and abilities of clinical research professionals. Int J Clin Trials. 2018;5(1):46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hornung C, Ianni P, Jones C, Samuels E, Ellingrod V. Indices of clinical research coordinators’ competence. J Clin Transl Sci. 2019;3(2–3):75–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sonstein SA, Seltzer J, Li R, Jones CT, Silva H, Daemen E. Moving from compliance to competency: A harmonized core competency framework for the clinical research professional. Clin Res. 2014;28(3):17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sonstein S, Silva H, Jones CT, Calvin-Naylor N, Halloran L, Yrivarren JL. Global self-assessment of competencies, role relevance, and training needs among clinical research professionals. Clin Res. 2016;30(6):38–45.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kerr J, Hornung CA, Gluck W, Jones C, Neidecker M. Student Perceived Clinical Research Competency: CICRP in CoAPCR Students. In: CoAPCR 2019 Consortium of Academic Programs in Clinical Research Annual Meeting; April 15, 2019; Nashville, TN, 2019.

Download references

Funding

The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The study was partially supported through the National Center for the Advancement of Translational Science (NCATS) Clinical Translational Science Award (CTSA) Grant UL1TR002733, The Ohio State University Center for Clinical Translational Science. All statements in this report, including its findings and conclusions are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of NCATS or the OSU CCTS. The funder supported the workforce development work of researchers but had no role in the conduct, analysis, or reporting of study findings.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors had made contributions to this manuscript. JK performed data collection. CAH, JK, WG and CTJ conceptualized the study, the manuscript framework and editing. CAH and JK performed data analyses. CTJ and JC created figures. All authors reviewed and agreed to the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolynn Thomas Jones DNP, MSPH, RN, FAAN.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Carlton A. Hornung, Jared Kerr, William Gluck, Carolynn Thomas Jones have declared no financial conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

This study was deemed exempt from review by the University of North Carolina Wilmington Institutional Review Board.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hornung, C.A., Kerr, J., Gluck, W. et al. The Competency of Clinical Research Coordinators: The Importance of Education and Experience. Ther Innov Regul Sci 55, 1231–1238 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-021-00320-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-021-00320-w

Keywords

Navigation