Skip to main content

On the Complexity of Probabilistic Inference in Singly Connected Bayesian Networks

  • Conference paper
Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets, Data Mining, and Granular Computing (RSFDGrC 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3641))

Abstract

In this paper, we revisit the consensus of computational complexity on exact inference in Bayesian networks. We point out that even in singly connected Bayesian networks, which conventionally are believed to have efficient inference algorithms, the computational complexity is still NP-hard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cooper, G.F.: The computational complexity of probabilistic inference using bayesian belief networks. Artificial Intelligence 42(2-3), 393–405 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Garey, M.R., Johnson, D.D.: Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jensen, F.V., Lauritzen, S.L., Olesen, K.G.: Bayesian updating in causal probabilistic networks by local computation. Computational Statistics Quarterly 4, 269–282 (1990)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Lauritzen, S.L., Spiegelhalter, D.J.: Local computation with probabilities on graphical structures and their application to expert systems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 50, 157–244 (1988)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Lepar, V., Shenoy, P.P.: A comparison of Lauritzen-Spiegelhalter, Hugin, and Shenoy-Shafer architectures for computing marginals of probability distributions. In: Cooper, G.F., Moral, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI 1998), July 24-26 1998, pp. 328–337. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pearl, J.: Fusion, propagation, and structuring in belief networks. Artificial Intelligence 29, 241–288 (1986)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Pearl, J.: Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Russell, S., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shafer, G.: Probabilistic Expert Systems. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wu, D., Butz, C. (2005). On the Complexity of Probabilistic Inference in Singly Connected Bayesian Networks. In: Ślęzak, D., Wang, G., Szczuka, M., Düntsch, I., Yao, Y. (eds) Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets, Data Mining, and Granular Computing. RSFDGrC 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3641. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11548669_60

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11548669_60

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28653-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31825-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics