Skip to main content

Preoperative Staging of Rectal Cancer: The MERCURY Research Project

  • Conference paper
Rectal Cancer Treatment

Part of the book series: Recent Results in Cancer Research ((RECENTCANCER,volume 165))

Abstract

The development of a surgical technique that removes the tumour and all local draining nodes in an intact package, namely total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery, has provided the impetus for a more selective approach to the administration of preoperative therapy. One of the most important factors that governs the success of TME surgery is the relationship of tumour to the circumferential resection margin (CRM). Tumour involves the CRM in up to 20% of patients undergoing TME surgery, and results in both poor survival and local recurrence. It is therefore clear that the importance of the decision regarding the use of pre-operative therapy lies with the relationship of the tumour to the mesorectal fascia. In addition, a high-spatial-resolution MRI technique will identify tumours exhibiting other poor prognostic features, namely, extramural spread >5 mm, extramural venous invasion by tumour, nodal involvement, and peritoneal infiltration. The potential benefits of a selective approach using MRI-based selection criteria are evident. That is, over 50% of patients can be treated successfully with primary surgery alone without significant risk of local recurrence or systemic failure. Of the remainder, potentially dramatic improvements may be achieved through the use of intensive and targeted preoperative therapy aimed not only at reducing the size of the primary tumour and rendering potentially irresectable tumour resectable with tumour-free circumferential margins, but also at enabling patients at high risk of systemic failure to benefit from intensive combined modality therapy aimed at eliminating micrometastatic disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akasu T, Sugihara K, Moriya Y, Fujita S (1997) Limitations and pitfalls of transrectal ultrasonography for staging of rectal cancer. Dis Col Rec 40:S10–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartram C, Brown G (2002) Endorectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer staging. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 31:827–839

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Birbeck KF, Macklin CP, Tiffin NJ, Parsons W, Dixon MF, Mapstone NP, Abbott CR, Scott N, Finan PJ, Johnston D, Quirke P (2002) Rates of circumferential resection margin involvement vary between surgeons and predict outcomes in rectal cancer. surgery Ann Surg, 235:449–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bokey EL, Ojerskog B, Chapuis P, Dent O, Newland RC, Sinclair G (1999) Local recurrence after curative excision of the rectum for cancer without adjuvant therapy: role of total anatomical dissection. Br J Surg 86

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown G, Davies S, Williams GT, Bourne MW, Newcombe RG, Radcliffe AG, Blethyn J, Dallimore NS, Rees BI, Phillips CJ, Maughan TS (2004) Effectiveness of preoperative staging in rectal cancer: digital rectal examination, endoluminal ultrasound, or magnetic resonance imaging? Br J Cancer 91:23–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown G, Radcliffe AG, Newcombe RG, Dallimore NS, Bourne MW and Williams GT (2003a) Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors inrectal cancer using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Surg 90:355–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown G, Richards CJ, Bourne MW, Newcombe RG, Radcliffe AG, Dallimore NS, Williams GT (2003b) Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of highspatial-resolution MR imaging with histopathologic comparison. Radiology 227:371–377

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown G, Richards CJ, Newcombe RG, Dallimore NS, Radcliffe AG, Carey DP, Bourne MW, Williams GT (1999) Rectal carcinoma: thin-section MR imaging for staging in 28 patients. Radiology 211:215–222

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chan TW, Kressel HY, Milestone B, Tomachefski J, Schnall M, Rosato E, Daly J (1991) Rectal carcinoma: staging at MR imaging with endorectal surface coil: Work in progress. Radiology 181:461–467

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chau I, Cunningham D, Tait AD, Brown G, Tebbutt N, Hill M, Wotherspoon A, Norman A, Massey A, Oates J (2003) Twelve weeks of neoadjuvant capecitabine (cap) and oxaliplatin (ox) followed by synchronous chemoradiation (CRT) and total mesorectal excision (TME) in MRI defined poor risk locally advanced rectal cancer resulted in promising tumour regression and rapid symptomatic relief. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 22:71

    Google Scholar 

  • de Lange EE (1994) Staging rectal carcinoma with endorectal imaging: how much detail do we really need? [editorial; comment] Radiology 190:633–635

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dukes CE, Bussey HJ (1958) The spread of cancer and its effect on prognosis. Cancer 12:309–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabbe E, Lierse W, Winkler R (1983) The perirectal fascia: morphology and use in staging of rectal carcinoma. Radiology 149:241–246

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haberkorn U, Strauss LG, Dimitrakopoulou A, Engenhart R, Oberdorfer F, Ostertag H, Romahn J, van Kaick G (1991) PET studies of fluorodeoxyglucose metabolismin patients with recurrent colorectal tumors receiving radiotherapy. J Nucl Med 32:1485–1490

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hadfield MB, Nicholson AA, MacDonald AW, Farouk R, Lee PW, Duthie GS, Monson JR (1997) Preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma by magnetic resonance imaging with a pelvic phasedarray coil. Br J Surg 84:529–531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hall NR, Finan PJ, al-Jaberi T, Tsang CS, Brown SR, Dixon MF, Quirke P (1998) Circumferential margin involvement after mesorectal excision of rectal cancer with curative intent Predictor of survival but not local recurrence? Dis Col Rect 41:979–983

    Google Scholar 

  • Harewood GC, Wiersema MJ, Nelson H, Maccarty RL, Olson JE, Clain JE, Ahlquist DA, Jondal ML (2002) A prospective, blinded assessment of the impact of preoperative staging on the management of rectal cancer. Gastro 123:24–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison JC, Dean PJ, el-Zeky F, Vander Zwaag R (1994) From Dukes through Jass: pathological prognostic indicators in rectal cancer. [See comments]. Hum Path 25:498–505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hermanek P, Henson DE, Hutter RV, Sobin LH (1993) UICC TNM supplement 1993. Acommentary on uniform use. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn A, Dahl O, Morild I (1990) The role of venous and neural invasion on survival in rectal adenocarcinoma. Dis Col Rect 33:598–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn A, Dahl O, Morild I (1991) Venous and neural invasion as predictors of recurrence in rectal adenocarcinoma. Dis Col Rect 34:798–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huebner RH, Park KC, Shepherd JE, Schwimmer J, Czernin J, Phelps ME, Gambhir SS (2000) A meta-analysis of the literature for whole-body FDG PET detection of recurrent colorectal cancer. J Nucl Med 41:1177–89

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hulsmans FH, Bosma A, Mulder PJ, Reeders JW, Tytgat GN (1992) Perirectal lymph nodes in rectal cancer: in vitro correlation of sonographic parameters and histopathologic findings. Radiol 184:553–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Imai Y (1999) MR imaging of rectal cancer using endorectal surface coil: histopathological correlation. Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi-Nippon Acta Radiologica, 59:458–66

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jass JR, Atkin WS, Cuzick J, Bussey HJ, Morson BC, Northover JM, Todd IP (1986) The grading of rectal cancer: historical perspectives and a multivariate analysis of 447 cases. Histopathol 10:437–59

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lonneux M, Reffad AM, Detry R, Kartheuser A, Gigot JF, Pauwels S (2002) FDG-PET improves the staging and selection of patients with recurrent colorectal cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 29:915–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mackay SG, Pager CK, Joseph D, Stewart PJ, Solomon MJ (2003) Assessment of the accuracy of transrectal ultrasonography in anorectal neoplasia. Br J Surg 90:346–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maier AG, Barton PP, Neuhold NR, Herbst F, Teleky BK, Lechner GL (1997) Peritumoral tissue reaction at transrectal US as a possible cause of overstaging in rectal cancer: histopathologic correlation. Radiol 203:785–789

    Google Scholar 

  • McNicholas MM, Joyce WP, Dolan J, Gibney RG, MacErlaine DP, Hyland J (1994) Magnetic resonance imaging of rectal carcinoma: a prospective study. Br J Surg 81:911–914

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta S, Johnson RJ, Schofield PF (1994) Staging of colorectal cancer. Clin Radiol 49:515–523

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Merkel S, Mansmann U, Siassi M, Papadopoulos T, Hohenberger W, Hermanek P (2001) The prognostic inhomogeneity in pT3 rectal carcinomas. Int J Colorectal Dis 16:298–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Okizuka H, Sugimura K, Yoshizako T, Kaji Y, Wada A (1996) Rectal carcinoma: prospective comparison of conventional and gadopentetate dimeglumine enhanced fat-suppressed MR imaging. J Mag Res Imag 6:465–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, Williams NS (1986) Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection: Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 2:996–999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rohren EM, Paulson EK, Hagge R, Wong TZ, Killius J, Clavien PA, Nelson RC (2002) The role of F-18 FDG positron emission tomography in preoperative assessment of the liver in patients being considered for curative resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. Clin Nucl Med 27:550–555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rollins G (2002) PET scans improve management decisions, reduce unnecessary surgery in recurrent colorectal cancer. Rep Med Guidel Outcomes Res 13:7–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruers TJ, Langenhoff BS, Neeleman N, Jager GJ, Strijk S, Wobbes T, Corstens FH, Oyen WJ (2002) Value of positron emission tomography with [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose in patients with colorectal liver metastases: a prospective study. J Clin Oncol 20:388–395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schnall MD, Furth EE, Rosato EF, Kressel HY (1994) Rectal tumor stage: correlation of endorectal MR imaging and pathologic findings. [See comments]. Radiology 190:709–714

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd NA, Baxter KJ, Love SB (1997) The prognostic importance of peritoneal involvement in colonic cancer: a prospective evaluation. Gastroenterol 112:1096–1102

    Google Scholar 

  • Simo M, Lomena F, Setoain J, Perez G, Castellucci P, Costansa JM, Setoain-Quinquer J, Domenech-Torne F, Carrio I (2002) FDG-PET improves the management of patients with suspected recurrence of colorectal cancer Nucl Med Commun 23:975–982

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinelli P, Schiavo M, Meroni E, Di Felice G, Andreola S, Gallino G, Belli F, Leo E (1999) Results of EUS in detecting perirectal lymph node metastases of rectal cancer: the pathologist makes the difference. Gastrointest Endo 49:754–758

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbot IC, Ritchie S, Leighton MH, Hughes AO, Bussey HJ, Morson BC (1981) Spread of rectal cancer within veins Histologic features and clinical significance. Am J Surg 141:15–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler W, Watzka S, Martin F, La Guardia G, Psenner K, Bonatti G, Fichtel G, Egarter-Vigl E, Marzoli GP (1994) Preoperative staging of rectal cancer by endoluminal ultrasound vs. magnetic resonance imaging. Preliminary results of a prospective, comparative study. Dis Col Rect, 37:1189–1193

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoeni RF (1989) CT evaluation of carcinomas of the colon and rectum. Radiol Clin of No Am 27:731–741

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoeni RF, Moss AA, Schnyder P, Margulis AR (1981) Detection and staging of primary rectal and rectosigmoid cancer by computed tomography. Radiology 141:135–138

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valk PE, Abella-Columna E, Haseman MK, Pounds TR, Tesar RD, Myers RW, Greiss HB, Hofer GA (1999) Whole-body PET imaging with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose in management of recurrent colorectal cancer. Arch Surg 134:503–511; discussion 511–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wallengren NO, Holtas S, Andren-Sandberg A (1996) Preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma using double-contrast MR imaging. Technical aspects and early clinical experiences. Acta Radiologica 37:791–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wibe A, Rendedal PR, Svensson E, Norstein J, Eide TJ, Myrvold HE, Soreide O (2002) Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 89:327–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolmark N, Fisher B, Wieand HS (1986) The prognostic value of the modifications of the Dukes' C class of colorectal cancer. An analysis of the NSABP clinical trials. Ann Surg 203:115–122

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zerhouni EA, Rutter C, Hamilton SR, Balfe DM, Megibow AJ, Francis R, Moss AA, Heiken JP, Tempany CM, Aisen AM, Weinreb JC, Gatsonis C, McNeil BJ (1996) CT and MR imaging in the staging of colorectal carcinoma: report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group II. Radiology 200:443–451

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Brown, G., Daniels, I.R. (2005). Preoperative Staging of Rectal Cancer: The MERCURY Research Project. In: Büchler, M.W., Weitz, J., Ulrich, B., Heald, R.J. (eds) Rectal Cancer Treatment. Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol 165. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27449-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27449-9_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23341-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-27449-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics