Abstract
“It’s the same, only it’s different.” This sounds like one of former American baseball player Yogi Berra’s malapropisms. Nevertheless, it is appropriate when discussing methods of disaster research. Fifty years ago, Lewis Killian (2002 [1956]) stated it this way: “Basically, the methodological problems of field studies in disasters are those common to any effort to conduct scientifically valid field studies in the behavioral sciences. The disaster situation itself, however, creates special or aggravated problems . . . ” (p. 49). The basic tools of disaster researchers—a theory, a working hypothesis, an appropriate research design, a plan for selecting cases for study, a strategy for gathering data or recording observations, and a way to extract meaning from the materials collected—are easily recognizable as those used in all of the social sciences. Yet, issues specific to disaster research need to be addressed.
Special thanks to Jo Karabasz for making sure that the author stayed with this project until it was completed. Conversations with Kathleen Tierney and Dennis Wenger greatly aided the updating of certain aspects of this chapter. Linda Bourque provided information and answered key questions about recent methodological issues in survey research. Each is herewith acknowledged without in any way being implicated in the resulting product. Comments and suggestions from the tri-editors were helpful in improving this chapter and are greatly appreciated, even though not every one of them was followed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Peacock, WG. (2002). Cross–national and comparative disaster research. In R.A. Stallings (Ed.), Methods of disaster research (pp. 235–250). Philadelphia: Xlibris.
Khondker, H.H. (2002). Problems and prospects of disaster research in the developing world: A case study of Bangladesh. In R.A. Stallings (Ed.), Methods of disaster research (pp. 334–348). Philadelphia: Xlibris.
Quarantelli, E.L. (1981). The command post view point of view in local mass communication systems. International Journal of Communication Research, 7, 57–73.
Farley, J.E. (1998). Down but not out: Earthquake awareness and preparedness trends in the St. Louis metropolitan area, 1990–1997. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 16, 303–319.
Dynes, R.R. (1970). Organized behavior in disaster. Lexington, MA: Heath Lexington Books.
Fritz, C.E., & Mathewson, J.H. (1957). Convergence behavior in disasters: A problem in social control. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council.
Emani, S., & Kasperson, J.X. (1996). Disaster communication via the information superhighway: Data and observations on the 1995 hurricane season. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 14, 321–342.
Webb, G.R., Wachtendorf, T., & Eyre, A. (2000). Bringing culture back in: Exploring the cultural dimensions of disaster. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 18, 5–19.
Weber, M. (1949). The methodology of the social sciences. New York: Free Press.
Faris, R.E.L. (1970 [1967]). Chicago sociology 1920–1932. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Erikson, K.T. (1966). Wayward puritans: A study in the sociology of deviance. New York: Wiley.
Taylor, V.A. (1977). Good news about disasters. Psychology Today, 11, 93–96.
Dearing, J.W., & Kazmierczak, J. (1993). Making iconoclasts credible: The Iben Browning earthquake prediction. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 11, 391–403.
Nimmo, D. (1984). TV network news coverage of Three Mile Island: Reporting disasters as technological tables. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 2, 115–145.
Quarantelli, E.L. (1998b). Epilogue: Where we have been and where we might go. In E.L. Quarantelli (Ed.), What is a disaster: Perspective on the question (pp. 234–273). London: Routledge.
Webb, G.R., Tierney, K.J., & Dahlhamer, J.M. (2000). Businesses and disasters: Empirical patterns and unanswered questions. Natural Hazards Review, 1, 83–90.
Quarantelli, E.L., & Dynes, R.R. (1970). Special issue: Organizational and groups behavior in disasters. American Behavioral Scientist, 13, 323–480.
Anderson, W.A. (1965). Some observations on a disaster subculture: The organizational response of Cincinnati, Ohio, to the 1964 flood. Columbus, OH: Research Note 6, The Ohio State University Disaster Research Center, Department of Sociology.
Erikson, K.T. (1976). Everything in its path: Destruction of community in the Buffalo Creek flood. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Drabek, T.E. (1970). Methodology of studying disasters. American Behavioral Scientist, 13, 331–343.
Killian, L.M. (2002). An introduction to the methodological problems of field studies in disasters. In R. A. Stallings (Ed.), Methods of disaster research (pp. 49–93). Philadelphia: Xlibris.
Wenger, D.E., & Friedman, B. (1986). Local and national media coverage of disaster: A content analysis of the print media’s treatment of disaster myths. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 4, 27–50.
Carlin, G. (2001). Napalm and silly putty. New York: Hyperion.
Scanlon, T.J. (2002b). Rewriting a living legend: Researching the 1917 Halifax explosion. In R.A. Stallings (Ed.), Methods of disaster research (pp. 266–301). Philadelphia: Xlibris.
Scanlon, T.J., & Taylor, B. (1977). A stand-by research capacity. Mass Emergencies, 2, 35–41.
Wenger, D.E., Dykes, J.D., Sebok, T.D., & Neff, J.L. (1975). It’s a matter of myths: An empirical examination of individual insight into disaster response. Mass Emergencies, 1, 33–46.
Drabek, T.E., & Key, W.H. (1984). Conquering disaster: Family recovery and long-term consequences. New York: Irvington.
Mileti, D. (1987). Sociological methods and disaster research. In R.R. Dynes, B. de Marchi, & C. Pelanda (Eds.), Sociology of disasters: Contributions of sociology to disaster research (pp. 57–69). Milan, Italy: Franco Angeli.
Quarantelli, E.L. (1954). The nature and conditions of panic. American Journal of Sociology, 60, 267–275.
Quarantelli, E.L. (2002c). The role of the mass communication system in natural and technological disasters and possible extrapolation to terrorism situations. Risk Management: An International Journal, 4, 7–22.
Etzioni, A. (1964). Modern organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Perry, R.W., & Quarantelli, E.L. (2005). What is a disaster? New answers to old questions. Philadelphia: Xlibris.
Biderman, A.D. (1966). Anticipatory studies and stand-by research capabilities. In R. Bauer (Ed.), Social indicators (pp. 68–153). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ollenburger, J.C., & Tobin, G.A. (1999). Women, aging, and post disaster stress: Risk factors for psychological morbidity. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 17, 65–78.
Elias, N. (1987). Involvement and detachment. Oxford: Blackwell.
Becker, H.S. (1967). Whose side are we on? Social Problems, 14, 239–247.
Dynes, R.R., & Quarantelli, E.L. (1968). What looting in civil disturbances really means. Trans-Action, 5, 9–4.
Neal, D.M. (2000). Developing degree programs in disaster management. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 18(3), 417–437.
Friesema, H.P., Caporaso J., Goldstein G., Lineberry, R., & McCleary, R. (1979). Aftermath: Communities after natural disasters. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
Quarantelli, E.L. (2005a). A social science research agenda for the disasters of the 21st century. In R.W. Perry & E.L. Quarantelli (Eds.), What is a disaster? New answers to old questions (pp. 325–396). Philadelphia: Xlibris.
Wilkins, L. (1986). Media coverage of the Bhopal disaster: A cultural myth in the making. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 4, 7–33.
Phillips, B. (2002). Qualitative methods and disaster research. In R. A. Stallings (Ed.), Methods of disaster research (pp. 194–211). Philadelphia: Xlibris.
Dynes, R.R, Quarantelli, E.L., & Kreps, G.A. (1972). A perspective on disaster planning. Columbus, OH: Disaster Research Center, The Ohio State University.
Van Willigen, M. (2001). Do disasters affect individuals’ psychological well-being? An over-time analysis of the effect of Hurricane Floyd on men and women in eastern North Carolina. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 19, 59–83.
Sweet, S. (1998). The effect of a natural disaster on social cohesion: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 16, 321–331.
Taylor, V.A. (1978). Future directions for study. In E. L. Quarantelli (Ed.), Disasters: Theory and methods (pp. 251–280). London and Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
Babbie, E. (1995). The practice of social research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Wright, J.D., Rossi, P.H., Wright, S.R., & Weber-Burdin, E. (1979). After the clean-up: Long-range effects of natural disasters. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
Dynes, R.R., Haas, J.E., & Quarantelli, E.L. (1967). Administrative, methodological, and theoretical problems of disaster research. Indian Sociological Bulletin, 4, 215–227.
Quarantelli, E.L., & Dynes, R.R. (1972). When disaster strikes: It isn’t much like what you’ve heard and read about. Psychology Today, 5(9), 66–70.
Seydlitz, R.J., Spencer, W., Laska, S., & Triche, E. (1991). The effects of newspaper reports on the public’s response to a natural hazard event. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 9, 5–29.
Hiroi, O., Mikami, S., & Miyata, K. (1985). A study of mass media reporting in emergencies. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 3, 21–49.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stallings, R.A. (2007). Methodological Issues. In: Handbook of Disaster Research. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32353-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32353-4_4
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-73952-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-32353-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)