Skip to main content

Quality Checking of Medical Guidelines through Logical Abduction

  • Conference paper
Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XX (SGAI 2003)

Abstract

Formal methods have been used in the past for the verification of the correctness of formalised versions of medical guidelines. In this paper a second possible application of the use of formal methods is proposed: checking whether a guideline conforms to global medical quality requirements. It is argued that this allows spotting design errors in medical guidelines, which is seen as a useful application for formal methods in medicine. However, this type of verification may require medical knowledge currently not available within the guidelines, i.e. medical background knowledge. In this paper, we propose a method for checking the quality of a treatment for a disorder, based on the theory of abductive diagnosis. We also examine the medical background knowledge required to be able to quality check a guideline. The method is illustrated by the formal analysis of an actual guideline for the management of diabetes mellitus type 2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Console L, Theseider Dupré D, and Torasso P. On the relationship between abduction and deduction, Journal of Logic and Computation 1991; 1(5): 661–690.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Forbus KD. Qualitative process theory. Artificial Intelligence 1984; 24: 85–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fox J, Johns N, Lyons C, Rahmanzadeh A, Thomson R, and Wilson P. PROforma: a general technology for clinical decision support systems. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 1997; 54: 59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fox J, and Das S. Safe and Sound: Artificial Intelligence in Hazardous Applications. Cambridge: MIT Press (jointly published with the American Association of Artificial Intelligence), 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kuipers BJ. Qualitative simulation. Artificial Intelligence 1986; 29: 289–388.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuipers BJ. Qualitative Reasoning. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lucas PJF. Logic engineering in medicine. The Knowledge Engineering Review 1995; 10(2): 153–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lucas PJF. Symbolic diagnosis and its formalisation. The Knowledge Engineering Review 1997; 12(2): 109–146.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Lucas PJF. Analysis of notions of diagnosis. Artificial Intelligence 1998; 105(1-2): 293–341.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Marcos M, Balser M, Ten Teije A, and Van Harmelen F. From informal knowledge to formal logic: a realistic case study in medical protocols. Proceedings of the 12th EKAW-2002, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ohno-Machado L, Gennari J, Murphy S, et al. Guideline Interchange Format: a model for representing guidelines. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 1998; 5(4): 357–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Poole D. A methodology for using a default and abductive reasoning system. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 1990, 5(5), 521–548.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Reif W. The KIV Approach to Software Verification. In: M. Broy and S. Jähnichen (eds.), KORSO: Methods, Languages, and Tools for the Construction of Correct Software. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 1009, Springer–Verlag, Berlin, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sackett DL, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, and Brian R. Evidence Based Medicine-How to Practice and Teach EBM. Haynes Churchill Livingstone, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shahar Y, Miksch S, and Johnson P. The Asgaard project: a task-specific framework for the application and critiquing of time-oriented clinical guidelines. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 1998; 14: 29–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Turner R. Logics for Artificial Intelligence. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Woolf SH. Evidence-based medicine and practice guidelines: an overview. Cancer Control 2000; 7(4): 362–367.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lucas, P. (2004). Quality Checking of Medical Guidelines through Logical Abduction. In: Coenen, F., Preece, A., Macintosh, A. (eds) Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XX. SGAI 2003. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-412-8_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-412-8_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-780-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-412-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics