Skip to main content

Post-mortem Changes and Artefacts

  • Chapter
Essentials of Autopsy Practice

Abstract

The interpretation of the autopsy findings derived from both the external and internal examination must be done in the context of the case. These observations, documentations, and conclusions are the fundamental skills of those whom perform medico-legal autopsies. Morgagni is quoted to have said;

Those who have dissected or inspected many bodies have at least learnt to doubt, while those who are ignorant of anatomy, and do not take the trouble to attend it, are in no doubt at all”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Knight B. Forensic pathology. London: Arnold. 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Moritz AR. Classical mistakes in forensic pathology. Am J Clin Pathol 1956;26:1383–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sturner WQ. Common errors in forensic pediatric pathology. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1998;19:317–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Human Tissue Act. HMSO, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brinkmann B. Harmonisation of medico-legal autopsy rules. Int J Legal Med 1999;113:1–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Robertson I, Mansfield R. Antemortem and postmortem bruises of the skin — their differentiation. J Forensic Med 1957;4:2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burke MP, Olumbe AK, Opeskin K. Postmortem extravasation of blood potentially simulating antemortem bruising. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1998;19:46–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Taylor’s principles and practice of medical jurisprudence. Mant AK, editor. 13th edn. London: Churchill Livingston, 1984; 128–55.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Haglund WD, Sorg MH. Forensic taphonomy. The post mortem fate of human remains. London: CRC Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dada M, Chetty R, Nel J . Misinterpretations at autopsy examination: a review of artifacts and lesions that mimic disease or injuires. J Pathol 1996; 179 (Suppl.):49A.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee KAP. Injuries caused by animals. In: Mason JK, Purdue BN, editors. The pathology of trauma. London: Arnold, 2000,265–82.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tedeschi CG, Eckert WG, Tedeschi LG . Forensic medicine. A study in trauma and environmental hazards. Vol. 2, London: WB Saunders Company, 1977; 1061–71.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Denic N, Huyer DW, Sinai SH, Lantz PE, Smith C, Silver MM. Cockroach: the omnivorous scavenger. Potential misinterpretation of post mortem injuries. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1997;18:177–80.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Harada K, Asa K, Imachi T, Yamaguchi Y, Yoshida K. Centipede inflicted postmortem injury. J Forensic Sci 1999;44:849–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Komar D, Beattie O. Postmortem insect activity may mimic perimortem sexual assual clothing patterns. J Forensic Sci 1998;43:792–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mason JK, editor. Post mortem artifacts. In: Forensic medicine. An illustrated reference. London: Chapman and Hall Medical, 1993; 39–42.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Roll P, Rous F. Injuries by chicken bills: characteristic wound morphology Forensic Sci Int 1991;52:25–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rossi ML, Shahrom AW, Chapman RC, Vanezis P. Postmortem injuries by indoor pets. Am J Foresic Med Pathol 1994;15:105–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tsokos M, Schulz F. Indoor postmortem animal interference by carnivores and rodents: report of two cases and review of the literature. Int J Legal Med 1999;112:115–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tsokos M, Matschke J, Gehl A, Koops E, Puschel K. Skin and soft tissue artifacts due to postmortem damage caused by rodents. Forensic Sci Int 1999;104:47–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mirza FH, Makhdoom PA. Importance of correct interpretation of postmortem artifacts in medicolegal autopsies. J Pak Med Assoc 1998;48:49–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lawler W. Bodies recovered from water: a personal approach and consideration of difficulties. J Clin Path 1992;45:654–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mayer RG, Bigelow GS, editors. Cavity embalming. In: Embalming. History, theory and practice. 2nd edn. Stamford: Appelton and Lange, 1996;253–67.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hanzlick R. Embalming, body preperation, burial and disinterment. An overview for forensic pathologists. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1994;15:122–31.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Choi D, Carroll N, Abrahams P. Spinal cord diameters in cadaveric specimens and magnetic resonance scans, to assess embalming artefacts. Surg Radiol Anat 1996;18:133–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Oxley DW. Examination of the exhumed body and embalming artifacts. Med Leg Bull 1984;33:1–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Opeskin K. An unusual injury. Med Sci Law 1992;32:58–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lawler W. Bodies associated with fire. J Clin Path 1993;46:886–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bohnert M, Rost T, Faller-Marquardt M, Rodohl D, Pollack S. Fractures of the base of the skull in charred bodies - postmortem heat injuries or signs of mechanical traumatisation? Forensic Sci Int 1997;87:55–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bell T. Anatomy, physiology and disease of the teeth. London: Stewart and Company 1829; 9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Whittacker DK, Thomas VC, Thomas RIM. Post-mortem pigmentation of teeth. Brit Dent J 1976;140:100–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Clark DH, Law M. Post-mortem pink teeth. Med Sci Law 1984;24:130–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Brondum N, Simonsen J. Post mortem red colouration of teeth. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1987;8:127–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ortmann C, DuChesne A. A partially mummified corpse with pink teeth and pink nails. Int J Leg Med 1998;111:35–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Walsh RM, Little JT. Photographic illustrative case. In Minerva. BMJ 1996;312:1682.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kaplan JA, Fossum RM. Patterns of facial resuscitaion injury in children. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1994;15:187–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Harm T, Rajs J. Face and neck injuries due to resuscitation versus throttling. Forensic Sci Int 1983;23:109–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Prinsloo I, Gordon I. Post-mortem dissection artefacts of the neck. Their differentiation from antemortem bruises. S Afr Med J 1951;25:358–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Keil W, Kondo Toshikazu, Beer G. Haemorrhages in the posterior cricoarytenoid muscles - an unspecific autopsy finding. Forensic Sci Int 1998;95:225–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Gregersen M, Vesterby A. Iatrogenic fractures of the hyoid bone and the thyroid cartilage. A case report. Forensic Sei Int 1981;17:41–3.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Gardner AN. Aspiration of food and vomit. Q J Med 1958;27:227–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Mendelson CL. Aspiration of stomach contents into the lungs during obstetric anaesthesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1946;52:191–206.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Knight BH. The significance of the postmortem discovery of gastric contents in the air passages. Forensic Sci 1975;6:229–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Holden HS, Crosfill JWL. The significance of foreign bodies in alveoli of the apparently dead. J Forensic Med 1955;2:141–50.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Tardieu A. A l’histoire de la mort par suffocation. Ann D’Hyd Poll et de Med Legale 1866;2:338–57.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Gordon I, Mansfield RA. Subpleural, subpericardial and subendocardial haemorrhages- A study of their incidence at necroscopy and of the spontaneous development, after death, of subpericardial petechiae. J Forensic Med 1955;2:31–50.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Zaini MRS, Knight B. Sub-pleural petechiae and pseudopetichiae. J Forensic Sci Soc 1982;22:141–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Edston E. Evaluation of agonal artifacts in the myocardium using a combination of histogical stains and immunohistochemistry. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1997;18:163–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. James R, Gilbert J, Byard RW. Posttraumatic diaphragmatic hernia and death-etiologic factor of putrefractive artifact? Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1999;20:66–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. McCann J, Reny D, Siebert J, Stephens BG, Wirtz S. Post mortem perianal findings in children. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1996;17(4):289–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Mant AK. The significance of spermatozoa in the penile urethra at post-mortem. J Forensic Sci Soc 1962;3:125–30.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Pounder DJ, Jones GR. Post-mortem redistribution — a toxicological nightmare. Forensic Sci Int 1990;45:253–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Hilberg T, Rogde S, Morland J. Postmortem drug distribution — human cases related to results in experimental animals. J Forensic Sci 1999;44:3–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Pounder D. Dead sober or dead drunk? May be hard to determine. BMJ 1998;316:87.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. O’Neal C.L, Poklis A. Postmortem production of ethanol and factors that influence interpretation. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1996;17:8–20.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Kojima T, Okamoto I, Yashiki M, Miyazaki T, Chikasue F, Degawa K, et al. Production of carbon monoxide in cadavers. Forensic Sci Int 1986;32:67–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Lokan RJ, James RA. Apparent post-mortem production of high levels of cyanide in blood. J Forensic Sci Soc 1987;27:253–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Seto Y. Stability and spontaneous production of blood cyanide during heating. J Forensic Sci 1996;41:465–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Chikasue F, Yashiki M, Kojima T, Miyazaki T, Okamoto I, Ohtani M, Kodama K. Cyanide distribution in five fatal cyanide poisonings and the effect of storage conditions on cyanide concentrations in tissue. Forensic Sci Int 1988;38:173–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Ballantyne B. In vitro production of cyanide in normal human blood and the influence of thiocyanate and storage temperature. Clin Toxicology 1977;11:173–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rutty, G.N. (2001). Post-mortem Changes and Artefacts. In: Rutty, G.N. (eds) Essentials of Autopsy Practice. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0699-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0699-9_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1181-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0699-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics