Skip to main content

Maya Hunting Sustainability: Perspectives from Past and Present

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Ethics of Anthropology and Amerindian Research

Abstract

This discussion will present evidence from two research projects, one zooarchaeological and the other ethnozoological, to address questions of sustainability in past and present Maya hunting practices. Zooarchaeological studies of animal remains from archaeological sites across the Maya region reveal some evidence of unsustainable hunting practices, primarily associated with larger and more politically complex settlements. However, these studies do not point to regional overhunting, biodiversity reduction, or extinctions, indicating that ancient Maya hunting was sustainable over 2,000 years. A second study investigates modern highland Maya hunting ceremonialism and reveals complex attitudes to wild animal harvesting. Belief in an “Animal Guardian” who determines hunting quotas and appropriate hunting behavior may link to an embedded conservation ethic. However, zoological harvest information gathered from the remains of hunted animals deposited at hunting shrines suggests that modern hunting practices may not reflect that ethic. Together, the two datasets are used to explore issues of complexity in past and present hunting activities. In each study, potentially sustainable practices become less-so under certain circumstances, particularly those causing stress on previously stable animal management systems. Some thoughts are offered on the difficulties and benefits of disseminating these complex results to different audiences. The value of understanding the factors that drive both sustainable and unsustainable practices far outweighs the disadvantages of presenting potentially unpalatable information about indigenous environmental resource management. The difficulty lies in presenting the research to each stakeholder in terms and contexts that are appropriate to understanding the implications of the data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We mapped and defined activity areas at each of three active communal shrines with the assistance of hunters and ritual practitioners. We recorded zooarchaeological data such as species, element, age, sex, side, and modifications on all remains, and linked these to the specific activity areas at each shrine. More recently we have been using these data to search for hunting shrines in the archaeological record which might indicate a continuity of these beliefs and practices into the ancient history of the Maya (Emery et al. 2009).

  2. 2.

    In Santiago Atitlán, the Tz’utujil Maya make pre-hunt offerings and hunting permission requests to the animal guardian in the Cofradía San Juan where they have transformed a colonial-period statue of Saint John the Baptist into the Guardian of the Animals (Carlsen 1997:98).

  3. 3.

    As the caretaker of wild fauna, specifically land mammals, the dueño protects the creatures of the forest making sure hunters do not abuse them or take more creatures then needed. If hunters do not maintain all ceremonial protocol, the animal guardian exacts revenge that can result in illness or even death of the person (Brown and Emery 2008).

  4. 4.

    In her extensive review, Brown notes ethnographic accounts of an animal guardian among the Yukatek, Mopan, Huastec, K’iche’, Tzeltal, and the Tz’utujil Maya (all examples are from Brown 2005:138). The Chortí of Guatemala receive instructions from the guardian of the deer in a dream before their hunt (Wisdom 1940:72–73). The Yukatek Maya provide maize offerings to the forest spirit known as T’zip, the supernatural protector of deer, to ensure hunting success (Redfield and Villa Rojas 1934:140). The Mopán Maya of Belize burn copal offerings to the morning star as the owner of animals (Thompson 1930:142). Among the Huastec Maya of Veracruz, pre-hunt rituals include the ceremonial opening of a corral with an enclosed deer skull which signifies the release of a deer from the “master of the animals” (Alcorn 1984:88). The Huichol of northern Mexico offer rites to the divine owner of deer (Myerhoff 1974:201). Brown offers many more examples.

    Brown and Emery (2008) also report that in the Guatemalan highlands, Archbishop Pedro Cortes y Larraz (1958 [1768–1770]:119–120) referred to hunting rituals where burned offerings were made around a deer carcass to a deer lord named Xaqui Coxol and he noted that the deer bones were carefully guarded to avoid the anger of Xaqui Coxol. Sapper (1897:268) recorded a deer-hunting ritual and offering of the head to Tzultakah (lord of the forest and guardian of animals) by Tzeltal Maya of Chiapas. Colonial period indigenous texts such as the sixteenth-century K’iche’ Popol Vuh also document an animal guardian (Tedlock 1985:51, 76–77).

    Several researchers have linked the modern and historic descriptions of the animal guardian to depictions of God Y in the codices, a god associated by many researchers with hunting and wild animals, particularly deer. God Y is evident in the Madrid Maya codex (Tozzer 1941:155, n. 780; Vail 1997:75; Zimmermann 1956), in various hunting almanacs, using deer accessories such as a deer headdress, antlers, and deer-ear ornaments (Bill 1997:114; Vail 1997), or with a deer, in both the Madrid (Taack 1973; Vail 1997) and the Maya Dresden codex (Colas 2006:83; Taube 2003:473, 475, Figures 7b-c). God Y’s name is read as Uuc Zip or 7 Zip in Yucatec orthography (Davoust 1997; Taube 2003:473), and the deer is sometimes described as yatan or “wife“ of Uuc Zip. Gabrielle Vail (1997, 2005) and others (Bill et al. 2000; Bricker 1991; Colas 2006; Taube 1988) link God Y with the hunting god Suhui Dzip described by Diego de Landa (Tozzer 1941).

    In Classic Period iconography, Taube (Taube 1997, 2003) has described the deer guardian T’zip depicted as a wrinkled old man with deer-like attributes including deer ears, antlers, and lips, as well as hunting clothing and accoutrement such as a grass skirt, broad-brimmed hat, or a conch shell trumpet (Brown 2005:139). Known depictions of T’zip are found on Classic Period ceramic vessels (Taube 2003:Fig. 26.7e,g) and in the painted murals of Bonampak (Taube 1997). Epigraphic references to T’zip are found in stone inscriptions at Copan (Taube 2003:Fig. 26.7c) and Dos Pilas (Taube 2003:Fig. 26.7b).

  5. 5.

    Formal interviews by Brown and informal discussions with Emery in 2007

  6. 6.

    Clear prey age and sex preferences are made by both the specialized hunters and the farmer/hunters. None of the hunters preferentially will hunt an immature animal of any game class except when hunting crias to take as pets (Emery personal experience and Jorge). All the hunters agree that males are preferred over females when hunting large game either because the males are bigger (Gabriel) or because the females might have young (Gabriel, Guadeloupe, Jorge) and may continue producing (Cornelio). Less emphasis is put on sex of small game and although males are still preferred (Guadeloupe, Cornelio), “they don’t stop to check” (Guadeloupe). Interestingly, one informant (Cornelio) commented that only males are taken when hunting sereques and micos because “the female menstruates and they’re too much like little women”. (All from Emery 2005 Interview Notes)

  7. 7.

    We cannot provide a direct quantification of the actual number of animals that contributed to our samples because the processes of use, deposition, and preservation are so variable that it is impossible to accurately predict the correlations between the animals used and the animal bones recovered. The NISP provides a count of all specimens analyzed but this measure over-represents animals that have very numerous skeletal elements as well as those with very well preserved elements (e.g. between robust bivalve shells and the fragile and delicate cranial bones of a fish). However, our comparisons are based on taxa from a single class, mammals, that are relatively similar in terms of preservation and recovery. Therefore, the NISP provides an accurate assessment of relative frequency in this study.

  8. 8.

    Data from other neotropical areas, although not as accurate as data from the specific region from Novack 2003 and Novack et al. 2005, are likely be within the range of population variation to be expected in comparing modern to ancient populations.

  9. 9.

    Dog is likely to have been managed differently at the various sites. It is one of the most frequently encountered species at Preclassic Kaminaljuyu as it is at many Preclassic sites across Mesoamerica (Clutton-Brock and Hammond 1994; Wing 1978). At Kaminaljuyu dogs are generally found in association with elite and ritual deposits, several times accompanying burials (Emery et al. in press; Kidder et al. 1946). Again, this seems to be a Preclassic trend (Rosenswig 2006; Teeter 2001). Dogs are less often found in ritual deposits in the later lowland sites.

  10. 10.

    This analysis is based on NISP which over-represents taxa with higher numbers of bony elements such as the turtle. The turtle has been conservatively estimated in all cases, but these values should be considered high. In all comparative analyses, the use of only mammals will render most taxonomic differences due to NISP irrelevant. However, the numerous scutes of the armadillo have been eliminated from the analysis as well since these also affect the comparisons when using NISP.

  11. 11.

    Because these two sites contain only mammals, artiodactyls represent a significantly higher proportion than at other sites. In all comparative analyses, the use of only mammals will counteract this difference

  12. 12.

    No remains of vulnerable species were found in the Kaminaljuyu samples examined here (Emery et al. in press). However, burials and caches at the site examined in earlier studies by other researchers did contain vulnerable species such as cats (including jaguars, pumas, ocelots, jaguarundi, and margay cats) and monkeys (both howler and spider monkeys) (Kidder et al. 1946). These were not quantified in the publications, so we are not able to include Kaminaljuyu in this analysis.

References

  • Adams, Richard E., Macleod, Murdo J. 2000 Cambridge History of the Native Peoples of the Americas. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albarella, Umberto 2001 Exploring the real nature of environmental archaeology: An introduction. In Environmental Archaeology: Meaning and Purpose, edited by U. Albarella, pp. 3–16. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcorn, Janis B. 1984 Huastec Mayan Ethnobotany. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Elyse. 2009 Exploring Maya Ritual Fauna: Caves and the Proposed Link with Contemporary Hunting Ceremonialism. Master’s Thesis, Anthropology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bill, Cassandra R. 1997 The Roles and Relationships of God M and Other Black Gods in the Codices, with Specific Reference to Pages 50–56 of the Madrid Codex. In Papers on the Madrid Codex, edited by V. R. Bricker and G. Vail, pp. 111–145. Middle American Research Institute, Pub. 64, Tulane University, New Orleans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bill, Cassandra R., Christine L. Hernández and Victoria R. Bricker. 2000 The Relationship Between Early Colonial Maya New Year’s Ceremonies and Some Almanacs in the Madrid Codex. Ancient Mesoamerica 11:149–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodmer, Richard E., John F. Eisenberg and Kent H. Redford. 1997 Hunting and the likelihood of extinction of Amazonian mammals. Conservation Biology 11(2):460–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bricker, Victoria R. 1991 Faunal Offerings in the Dresden Codex. In Sixth Palenque Round Table, 1986, edited by M. G. Robertson and V. M. Fields, pp. 285–292. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broughton, Jack M. 1994 Declines in Mammalian Foraging Efficiency During the Late Holocene, San Francisco Bay, California. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 13:341–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broughton, Jack M. 2001 Resource Intensification and Late Holocene Human Impacts on Pacific Coast Bird Populations: Evidence from the Emeryville Shellmound Avifauna. In Posing Questions for a Scientific Archaeology, edited by T. L. Hunt, C. P. Lipo and S. L. Sterling, pp. 251–278. Bergin and Garvey, Westport, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broughton, Jack M., Daniel Mullins and Tamara Ekker. 2007 Avian resource depression or intertaxonomic variation in bone density? A test with San Francisco Bay avifaunas. Journal of Archaeological Science 34:374–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Linda. 2002 The Structure of Ritual Practice: An Ethnoarchaeological Exploration of Activity Areas at Rural Community Shrines in the Maya Highlands. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Anthropology, University of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Linda. 2005 Planting the Bones: Hunting Ceremonialism at Contemporary and Nineteenth-Century Shrines in the Guatemalan Highlands. Latin American Antiquity 16(131–146).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Linda. 2006 Planting the Bones: An Ethnoarchaeological Exploration of Hunting Shrines and Deposits. In Grantee Reports. Foundation for the Advancement of Mesoamerican Studies, Inc., Crystal River, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Linda A. 2004 Dangerous Places and Wild Spaces: Creating Meaning with Materials and Space at Contemporary Maya Shrines on El Duende Mountain. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 11(1):31–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Linda A. and Kitty F. Emery. 2008 Negotiations with the Animate Forest: Hunting Shrines and Houses in the Maya Highlands. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 15:300–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Linda and Luis Alberto Romero. 2002 Lugares Sagrados para Ritos de la Cacería. In XV Simposio de Investigaciones Arqueologicas en Guatemala, 2001, edited by J. P. Laporte, H. Escobedo and B. Arroyo, pp. 771–778. Museo National de Arqueología y Ethnología, Guatemala City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsen, Robert S. 1997 War for the Heart and Soul of a Highland Maya Town. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsen, Robert S. and M. Prechtel. 1991 The Flowering of the Dead: An Interpretation of Highland Maya Culture. Man 26:23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, J. and Norman Hammond. 1994 Hot Dogs: Comestible canids in Preclassic Maya culture at Cuello, Belize. Journal of Archaeological Sciences 21:819–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colas, Pierre R. 2006 The Hunting Scenes in the Madrid Codex: A Planner for Hunting Rituals. In Sacred Books, Sacred Languages: Two Thousand Years of Ritual and Religious Maya Literature, edited by G. V. Rivera and G. L. Fort, pp. 81–92. Verlag Anton Saurwein: 10 ed. Acta Mesoamerica, Markt Schawaben.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortes y Laraz, Pedro. 1958 [1768–1770] Descripción Geográfico-Moral de la Diócesis de Goathemala. Tipografia Nacional, Guatemala City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz-Uribe, K. 1988 The Use and Meaning of Species Diversity and Richness in Archaeological Faunas. Journal of Archaeological Science 15(2):179–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davoust, Michel. 1997 Un Nouveau Commentaire du Codex de Dresde. CNRS Editions, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeClerck, Fabrice, A.J., Robin Chazdon, Karen D. Holl, Jeffrey C. Milder, Bryan Finegan, Alejandra Martinez-Salinas, Pablo Imbach, Lindsay Canet and Zayra Ramos. 2010 Biodiversity Conservation in Human-Modified Landscapes of Mesoamerica: Past, Present, and Future. Biological Conservation pre-print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Jared. 2004 Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. Viking Adult, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, Kitty F. 2003 The Economics of Natural Resource Use at Ancient Motul de San Jose, Guatemala. Mayab 16:33–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, Kitty F. 2007 Assessing the impact of ancient Maya animal use. Journal of Nature Conservation 15(3):184–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery, Kitty F. 2008a Medicinal Curation and Use of Animals by the Itzaj Maya of Guatemala: Implications for Zooarchaeology. Proceedings of the Canadian Association of Archaeology. Peterborough, ON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, Kitty F. 2008b A Zooarchaeological Test for Dietary Resource Depression at the End of the Classic Period in the Petexbatun, Guatemala. Human Ecology 36(5):617–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery, Kitty F. 2010 Dietary, Environmental, and Societal Implications of Ancient Maya Animal Use in the Petexbatun: A Zooarchaeological Perspective on the Collapse. Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville, TN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, Kitty F. in press Zooarchaeology of Motul de San Jose, an Economic Perspective. In Politics, History, and Economy at the Classic Maya Polity of Motul de San Jose, Guatemala, edited by A. E. Foias and K. F. Emery. University of Florida Presses, Gainesville, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, Kitty F., Linda A. Brown, Elyse M. Anderson, Erin Kennedy Thornton and Michelle LeFebvre. 2007 Ethno-Zoology of Modern Maya Ritual Animal Bone Caches and Implications for Interpretations of Ancient Maya Diet and Ritual. Proceedings of the University of Calgary Chacmool Conference. Calgary, Alberta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, Kitty F., Susan Milbrath, Elyse Anderson and Erol Kavountzis. 2009 Maya Codices, Caves, and Animals: Zooarchaeological and Symbolic Evidence. Paper presented at the Symposium on Animal Symbolism in the Mesoamerican Codex Tradition, Albuquerque, NM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, Kitty F. and Erin Kennedy Thornton. 2008a Zooarchaeological Habitat Analysis of Ancient Maya Landscape Changes. Journal of Ethnobiology 28(2):154–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery, Kitty F. and Erin Kennedy Thornton. 2008b Zooarchaeological Isotopic Chemistry: A Regional Perspective on Biotic Change during the Classic Maya Occupation of the Guatemalan Peten. Quaternary International 191:131–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery, Kitty F. and Erin Kennedy Thornton. in press Tracking Climate Change in the Ancient Maya World through Zooarchaeological Habitat Analyses. In The Great Maya Droughts in Cultural Context, edited by G. Iannone. University Press of Colorado, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, Kitty F., Erin Kennedy Thornton, Nicole R. Cannarozzi, Stephen D. Houston and Hector Escobedo. in press Ancient Animals of the Southern Maya Highlands: Zooarchaeology of Kaminaljuyu. In Archaeology of Mesoamerican Animals, edited by C. Götz and K. F. Emery. David Brown Book Company, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, Anabel and Kitty F. Emery. 2008 Exploring the Legacy of the Maya Forest. Journal of Ethnobiology 28(2):147–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, Anabel and Ronald B. Nigh. 2009 Origins of the Maya Forest Garden: A Resource Management System. Journal of Ethnobiology 29(2):213–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, Jack. 2007 Special Issue on Zooarchaeology and Conservation. Journal of Nature Conservation 15(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, Toby A., Jos Barlow, Navjot S. Sodhi and Carlos A. Peres. 2010 A Multi-Region Assessment of Tropical Forest Biodiversity in a Human-Modified World. Biological Conservation 143(10):2293–2300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, Mel. 2006 Apocalypto. Touchstone Pictures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, Donald K. 1984 Quantitative Zooarchaeology. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidder, Alfred V., Jesse D. Jennings and Edward M. Shook. 1946 Excavations at Kaminaljuyu, Guatemala. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication 576. Carnegie Institution, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, R. and G. Jones. 1989 Quantifying Diversity in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R. Lee and Kenneth P. Cannon (editors). 2004 Zooarchaeology and Conservation Biology. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, UT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, David B. 1993 Testing Diet Breadth Models: Examining Adaptive Change in the Late Prehistoric Great Basin. Journal of Archaeological Science 20:321–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menchu, Rigoberta. 1983 I, Rigoberta Menchu An Indian Woman in Guatemala. Verso, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mugaas, John N., John Seidensticker and Kathleen P. Mahlke-Johnson. 1993 Metabolic Adaptation to Climate and Distribution of the Raccoon Procyon lotor and Other Procyonidae. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, No 542. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myerhoff, Barbara G. 1974 Peyote Hunt: The Sacred Journey of the Huichol Indians. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, Norman, Russell A. Mittermeier, Cristina G. Mittermeier, Gustavo A.B. da Fonseca and Jennifer Kent. 2000 Biodiversity Hotspots for Conservation Priorities. Nature 403:853–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naranjo, Eduardo J. and Richard E. Bodmer. 2007 Source-Sink Systems and Conservation of Hunted Ungulates in the Lacandon Forest, Mexico. Biological Conservation 138:412–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naranjo, Eduardo J., Michelle M. Guerra, Richard E. Bodmer and Jorge E. Bolaños. 2004 Subsistence Hunting by Three Ethnic Groups of the Lacandon Forest, Mexico. Journal of Ethnobiology 24(2):233–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novack, Anthony J. 2003 Impacts of subsistence hunting on the foraging ecology of jaguar and puma in the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala. MSc, Wildlife Ecology, University of Florida, Gainesville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novack, Anthony J., Martin B. Main, Melvin E. Sunquist and Ronald F. Labisky. 2005 Foraging Ecology of Jaguar (Panthera onca) and Puma (Puma concolor) in Hunted and Non-Hunted Sites Within the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala. Journal of Zoology, London 267:167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redfield, Robert and Alfonso Villa Rojas. 1934 Chan Kom, A Maya Village. Carnegie Institution of Washington, publication 448, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitz, Elizabeth J., Wing, Elizabeth S., 2008. Zooarchaeology. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, John G. and Elizabeth L. Bennett. 2004 Having your wildlife and eating it too: An analysis of hunting sustainability across tropical ecosystems. Animal Conservation 7(4):397–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, John G. and Kent H. Redford. 1991 Sustainable Harvest of Neotropical Wildlife. In Neotropical Wildlife Use and Conservation, edited by J. G. Robinson and K. H. Redford, pp. 415–429. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, John G. 2000 Calculating Maximum Sustainable Harvests and Sustainable Offtakes. In Hunting for Sustainability in Tropical Forests, edited by J. G. Robinson and E. L. Bennett, pp. 521–524. Columbia University Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, John G. 2001 Using Sustainable Use Approaches to Conserve Exploited Species. In Conservation of Exploited Species, edited by J. Reynolds, G. A. Mace, K. H. Redford and J. G. Robinson, pp. 485–498. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, John G. 2010 Ethical Pluralism, Pragmatism, and Sustainability in Conservation Practice. Biological Conservation doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.04.017.

  • Robinson, John G. and Elizabeth L. Bennett. 2000 Carrying Capacity Limits to Sustainable Hunting in Tropical Forests. In Hunting for Sustainability in Tropical Forests, edited by J. G. Robinson and E. L. Bennett, pp. 13–30. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, John G. and Kent H. Redford. 1986 Intrinsic Rate of Natural Increase in Neotropical Forest Mammals: Relationship to Phylogeny and Diet. Oecologia 68:516–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenswig, Robert M. 2006 Sedentism and Food Production in Early Complex Societies of the Soconusco, Mexico. World Archaeology 38(2):330–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapper, Karl. 1897 Northern Central America with a Trip to the Highlands of Anahuac: Travels and Studies of the Years 1888–1895. F. Viewig, Brunswick.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharer, Robert J., Traxler, Loa P. 2005 The Ancient Maya, 6th Edition. Stanford University Press, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, E.H. 1949 Measurement of Diversity. Nature 163:688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slade, Norman A., Richard Gomulkiewicz and Helen M. Alexander. 1998 Alternatives to Robinson and Redford’s Method of Assessing Overharvest from Incomplete Demographic Data. Conservation Biology 12(1):148–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steadman, David W. 2006 Extinction and Biogeography of Tropical Pacific Birds. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, D.W. and J.R. Krebs. 1986 Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taack, George H. 1973 An Iconographic Study of Deer Hunting Scenes in Maya Painting: Codex Madrid and Vases from Calcehtok and Altun Ha. Master’s thesis, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, N.M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taube, Karl A. 1988 The Ancient Yucatec New Year Festival: The Liminal Period in Maya Ritual and Cosmology. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Yale University, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taube, Karl A. 1997 A God Named Zip. Archaeology 50:39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taube, Karl A. 2003 Ancient and Contemporary Maya Conceptions about Forest and Field. In The Lowlands Maya Area: Three Millennia at the Human-Wildland Interface, edited by A. Gomez-Pompa, M. F. Allen, S. L. Fedick and J. J. Jiménez-Osornio, pp. 461–492. Food Products Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedlock, Dennis. 1985 Popol Vuh: The Mayan Book of the Dawn of Life. Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teeter, Wendy G. 2001 Animal Utilization in a Growing City: Vertebrate Exploitation at Caracol, Belize. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. Eric S. 1930 Ethnology of the Mayas of Southern and Central British Honduras, Anthropological Series 17(2). Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, Daniel, Lyn Branch and Melvin Sunquist. 2011 Passive Sampling Effects and Landscape Location Alter Associations Between Species Traits and Response to Fragmentation. Ecological Applications 21(3):817–829.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tozzer, Alfred M. 1941 Landa’s Relacion de las Cosas de Yucatan. Harvard University, Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 18, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vail, Gabrielle. 1997 The Deer-Trapping Almanacs in the Madrid Codex. In Papers on the Madrid Codex, edited by V. R. Bricker and G. Vail, pp. 73–110. Middle American Research Institute, Pub. 64, Tulane University, New Orleans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vail, Gabrielle. 2005 Renewal Ceremonies in the Madrid Codex. In Painted Books and Indigenous Knowledge in Mesoamerica: Manuscript Studies in Honor of Mary Elizabeth Smith, edited by E. H. Boone, pp. 179–209. Middle American Research Institute, Pub. 69, Tulane University, New Orleans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valadez Azúa, Raúl. 2000 Prehispanic Dog Types in Middle America. In Dogs Through Time: An Archaeological Perspective, edited by S. J. Crockford, pp. 193–204. BAR International Series 889, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wing, Elizabeth S. 1978 Use of Dogs for Food: An Adaptation to the Coastal Environment. In Prehistoric Coastal Adaptations: The Economy and Ecology of Maritime Middle America., edited by B. L. Stark and B. Voorhies, pp. 29–41. Studies in Archaeology. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisdom, Charles. 1940 The Chorti Indians of Guatemala. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zapata Rios, Galo. 2001 Sustentabilidad de la caceria de subsistencia: El caso de cuatro comunidades Quichuas en la Amazonia Nororiental Ecuatoriana. Journal of Neotropical Mammalogy 8(1):59–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeller, Kathy. 2007 Jaguars in the New Millennium Data Set Update: The State of the Jaguar in 2006. Report prepared for the Wildlife Conservation Society’s Jaguar Conservation Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, Günter. 1956 Die Hieroglyphen der Maya-Handschriften. Cram, de Gruyter, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research discussed in this paper was funded by the National Science Foundation and the Wenner Gren Foundation. Our thanks also to our friends and collaborators of the Maya highlands and lowlands – our research and lives have been enriched by the time we have spent with them. Finally, thanks to Richard Chacon for his enthusiasm, suggestions, and support during the writing of this paper!

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kitty F. Emery Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Emery, K.F., Brown, L.A. (2012). Maya Hunting Sustainability: Perspectives from Past and Present. In: Chacon, R., Mendoza, R. (eds) The Ethics of Anthropology and Amerindian Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1065-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics