Abstract
There have been three waves of large-scale academic movements in attempting to include non-Western cultures into psychological research, namely, modernization theory, research on individualism–collectivism, and the indigenization movement of psychology. In view of the difficulties encountered by most indigenous psychologists who adopted the inductive approach of the bottom-up model building paradigm, the author argued for an epistemological goal of indigenous psychology following the principle of cultural psychology: “one mind, many mentalities” (Shweder et al., The cultural psychology of development: One mind, many mentalities. Handbook of child psychology, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1998); in addition, the author advocated for constructing psychology theories that may represent universal mind of human beings, as well as the particular mentalities of people living in a specific culture. Due to the fact that theories of modern social sciences have been constructed on the basis of the Western philosophy of science, indigenous psychologists in non-Western countries have to make three levels of breakthroughs for the sake of attaining such an epistemological goal: philosophical reflection, theoretical construction, and empirical research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adair, J. G., Puhan, B. N., & Vohra, N. (1993). Indigenous of psychology: Empirical assessment of progress in Indian research. International Journal of Psychology, 28, 149–169.
Armer, M., & Youtz, R. (1971). Formal education and individual modernity in an African society. The American Journal of Sociology, 71, 604–626.
Azuma, H. (1984). Psychology in a non-Western culture: The Philippines. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 272–292.
Bridgman, P. W. (1972). The logic of modern physics. NY: The Macmillan Co.
Berry, J. W., & Kim, U. (1993). The way ahead: From indigenous psychologies to a universal psychology. In U. Kim & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context (pp. 277–280). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Berry, J. W. (1989). Imposed etics-emics-dervied etics: The operationalization of a compelling idea. International Journal of Psychology, 24, 721–735.
Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Segall, M. H., & Dasen, P. R. (1992). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dawson, J. L. M. (1967). Traditional versus Western attitudes in West Africa: The construction, validation, and application of a measuring device. The British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 6, 81–96.
Doob, L. W. (1967). Scales for assessing psychological modernization in Africa. Public Opinion Quarterly, 31, 414–421.
Enriquez, V. (1977). Filipino psychology in the Third World. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 10, 3–18.
Enriquez, V. (1993). Developing a Filipino psychology. In U. Kim & J. Berry (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context (pp. 152–169). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Fiske, A. P. (1991). Structures of social life: The four elementary forms of human relations. NY: The Free Press.
Fiske, A. P. (2002). Using individualism and collectivism to compare cultures – a critique of the validity and measurement of the constructs: Comment on Oyserman et al. (2002). Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 78–88.
Greenfield, P. M. (2000). Three approaches to the psychology of culture: Where do they come from? Where can they go? Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3(3), 223–240.
Guthrie, G. M. (1977). A social-psychological analysis of modernization in the Philippines. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 8, 177–206.
Henry, P. (1986). Indigenous religion and the transformation of peripheral society. In J. K. Hadden & A. Shupe (Eds.), Prophetic religion and politics (pp. 123–150). New York: Paragon House.
Hermans, J. M., & Kempen, J. G. (1998). Moving cultures: The perilous problem of cultural dichotomy in a globalized society. American Psychologiset, 53(10), 1111–1120.
Ho, D. Y. F. (1993). Relational orientation in Asian social psychology. In U. Kim & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context (pp. 240–259). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Ho, D. Y. F. (1988). Asian psychology: A dialogue on indigenization and beyond. In A. C. Paranjpe, D. Y. F. Ho, & R. W. Rieber (Eds.), Asian contributions to psychology (pp. 53–77). New York: Praeger.
Ho, D. Y. F. (1998). Indigenous psychologies: Asian perspectives. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29(1), 88–103.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London, England: McGraw-Hill.
Huntington, S. (1997). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Hwang, K. K. (1987). Face and favor: The Chinese power game. The American Journal of Sociology, 92(4), 945–974.
Hwang, K. K. (2000). The logic of social sciences (In Chinese). Taipei, Taiwan: Psychological Publishing Co.
Hwang, K. K. (2005). From anticolonialism to postcolonialism: The emergence of Chinese indigenous psychology in Taiwan. International Journal of Psychology, 40(4), 228–238.
Hwang, K. K. (2006). Constructive realism and confucian relationism: An epistemological strategy for the development of indigenous psychology. In U. Kim, K. S. Yang, & K. K. Hwang (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (pp. 73–108). New York: Springer.
Inkeles, A. (1966). The modernization of man. In M. Weiner (Ed.), Modernization: The Dynamics of Growth (pp. 151–163). NY: Basic Books.
Inkeles, A. (1968). The measurement of modernism: A study of values in Brazil and Mexico. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Inkeles, A., & Smith, D. H. (1974). Becoming modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kim, U., & Berry, J. (Eds.). (1993). Indigenous cultural psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context (pp. 1–29). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Kim, U. (2000). Indigenous, cultural, and cross-cultural psychology: A theoretical, conceptual, and epistemological analysis. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3(3), 265–287.
Kim, U., Park, Y. S., & Park, D. (2000). The challenger of cross-cultural psychology: The role of the indigenous psychologies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(1), 63–75.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1976). Tristes tropiques. London: Penguin.
Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3–72.
Osyerman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking Individualism and Collectivism: Evaluation of Theoretical Assumptions and Meta-Analyses Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3–72.
Poortinga, Y. H. (1996). Indigenous psychology: Scientific ethnocentrism in a new guise? In J. Pandey, D. Sinha, & D. P. S. Bhawuk (Eds.), Asian contributions to cross-cultural psychology (pp. 59–71). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Poortinga, Y. H. (1999). Do differences in behavior imply a need for different psychologies? Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48(4), 419–432.
Poortinga, Y. H. (1997). Towards convergence. In J. W. Berry, Y. H. Poortinga, J. Pandey, P. R. Dasen, T. S. Saraswathi, M. H. Segall, & C. Kagitcibasi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 347–387). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Popper, K. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schimmack, U., Oishi, S., & Diener, E. (2005). Individualism: A valid and important dimension of cultural differences between Nations. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 9, 17–31.
Schnaiberg, A. (1970). Measuring modernism: Theoretical and empirical explorations. Americal Journal of Sociology, 76, 399–425.
Shweder, R. A. (1996). The “mind” of cultural psychology. In P. Baltes & U. Staudinger (Eds.), Interactive minds: Life-span perspectives on the social foundations of cognition (pp. 430–436). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Shweder, R. A. (2000). The psychology of practice and the practice of the three psychologies. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 207–222.
Shweder, R. A., Goodnow, J., Hatano, G., LeVine, R., Markus, H., & Miller, P. (1998). The cultural psychology of development: One mind, many mentalities. In W. Damon (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, 1 (pp. 865–937). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Sinha, D. (1984). Psychology in the context of third world development. International Journal of Psychology, 19, 17–29.
Sinha, D. (1986). Psychology in a third world country: The Indian Experience. New Delhi: Sage.
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Triandis, H. C. (2000). Dialectics between cultural and cross-cultural psychology. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3(3), 185–195.
Wallerstein, I. (1979). The capitalist world-economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wallner, F. G. & Jandl, M. J. (2001). The importance of constructive realism for the indigenous psychologies approach. Paper presented at Scientific Advances in Indigenous Psychologies: Philosophical, Cultural, and Empirical Contributions. Taipei: Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica.
Yang, K. S., & Hchu, H. Y. (1974). Determinate, correlates, and consequences of Chinese individual modernity. Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica, 37, 1–37 (in Chinese).
Yang, K. S. (1981). The formation and charge of Chinese personality: A cultural-ecological perspective. Acta Psychologica Taiwanica, 23, 39–55 (in Chinese).
Yang, K. S. (2003). Methodological and theoretical issues on psychological traditionality and modernity research in an Asian society: In response to Kwang-Kuo Hwang and beyond. Asian Journal Social Psychology, 6, 287–288.
Yang, K. S. (1993). Why do we need to develop an indigenous Chinese psychology? Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 1, 6–88 (In Chinese).
Yang, K. S. (1997). Indigenous compatibility in psychological research and its related problems. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 8, 75–120.
Yang, K. S. (1999). Towards an indigenous Chinese psychology: A selective review of methodological, theoretical, and empirical accomplishments. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 41, 181–211.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hwang, KK. (2012). The Epistemological Goal of Indigenous Psychology. In: Foundations of Chinese Psychology. International and Cultural Psychology, vol 1. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1439-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1439-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1438-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1439-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)