Abstract
In medical school I was taught the mantra of history, examination, diagnosis and treatment. Each was supposed to follow the other in a rational and linear sequence with a single diagnosis suggesting appropriate treatment. Yet in practice, it is almost never like this. A single patient has hypertension—so far so good—but she also has bronchiectasis after many years of smoking. She has just been diagnosed with cancer of the oesophagus. She has a daughter with severe learning difficulties and she is fearful, not only for herself but also about what will happen to her child. She is married and the relationship is difficult. Her sister has lung cancer and is already very ill. The sister’s children have problems and children of their own and this is only the beginning of a story which has become richer and richer the longer I have known this patient and her family. It is a story with multiple components each of which interacts with the others unpredictably. Each of the components has a history which affects the interaction and each has the capacity to affect my patient’s blood pressure and to support or undermine the treatment that I am prescribing for her. Seeing this situation as a complex adaptive system is much more useful than trying to stick to the medical school mantra because sensitivity, intuition, commitment and a pragmatic preparedness to muddle through then become as important as a sound grasp of biomedical knowledge.
The core of this chapter was first written as a keynote presentation to the Annual Conference of the Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners in Wellington in 2004 (with permission from NZFP)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Stewart I. Sources of uncertainty in deterministic dynamics: an informal overview. Phil Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2011;369(1956):4705–29.
Holt TA. A chaotic model for tight diabetes control. Diabet Med. 2002;19(4):274–8.
Reid I. Let them eat complexity: the emperor’s new toolkit. Br Med J. 2002;324:171.
Midgley M. Science and poetry. London: Routledge; 2001.
Goodwin JS. Chaos, and the limits of modern medicine. JAMA. 1997;278(17):1400.
Byrne D. Complexity theory and social research. Social Research Update, Issue 18, 1997.
Frayn M. Copenhagen. London: Methuen Drama; 1998.
Lesser W. Sauntering through the commas: the pleasures of a book revisited. The Guardian, Saturday 22 Dec 2001.
Coleridge ST. Notebooks, Volume 3, 1809-1818. In: Holmes R, editor. Coleridge: darker reflections. London: Harper Collins; 1998.
Heisenberg W. In: Berger J. The moment of cubism and other essays. London: Weidenfield & Nicolson; 1969.
Gigerenzer G, JA Muir Gray JA, editors. Better doctors, better patients, better decisions: Strüngmann forum report. Boston: MIT Press; 2011.
http://www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/booth/glossary/NNH.html. Accessed 28 Dec 2011.
Nussbaum MC. The fragility of goodness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1986.
Steiner G. Errata: an examined life. London: Phoenix; 1998.
Williams WC. The doctor stories. New York: New Directions Books; 1984.
Heisenberg W. Physics and philosophy: the revolution of modern science. New York: Harper; 1958.
Stacey RD. Complexity and group processes: a radically social understanding of individuals. London: Brunner-Routledge; 2003.
Nessa J, Malterud K. Tell me what is wrong with me: a discourse analysis approach to the concept of patient autonomy. J Med Ethics. 1998;24:394–400.
Chapman J. System failure. Why governments must learn to think differently. London: Demos; 2002.
Schellevis FG, van der Velden J, van de Lisdonk EH, van Eijk JTM, van Weel C. Comorbidity of chronic disease in general practice. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46:469–73.
Rosenberg CE. The tyranny of diagnosis: specific entities and individual experience. Milbank Q. 2002;80(2):237–60.
Roth P. I married a communist. London: Jonathan Cape; 1998.
Nussbaum MC. Poetic justice: the literary imagination and public life. Boston: Beacon Press; 1995.
Lee H. Review of John McGahern’s ‘That they may face the rising sun’. The Observer, 6 Jan 2002.
McWhinney IR. Being a general practitioner: what it means. Eur J Gen Pract. 2001;6:135–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Heath, I. (2013). Complexity, Uncertainty and Mess as the Links Between Science and the Humanities in Health care. In: Sturmberg, J., Martin, C. (eds) Handbook of Systems and Complexity in Health. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4998-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4998-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4997-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4998-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)