Skip to main content

Using Past Performance to Improve Future Practice

A Framework for Method Evaluation and Improvement

  • Chapter
Evolution and Challenges in System Development

Abstract

In spite of the decades of experiences of IS development and the substantial amount of research spent on research in the area, there is little evidence to suggest that there have been significant improvements in the effectiveness of system development methods. There are of course numerous potential explanations for the failure and many new approaches put forward to overcome the problems. Our research, which is built around case studies of how development projects are evaluated, suggests that method use and project management could be improved by making greater use of past experiences. We propose a framework for method evaluation and improvement which incorporates findings from empirical studies and theoretical perspectives from organizational learning and IS evaluation literatures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Argyris, C. & Schon, D., (1978), Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Reading, Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avegerou, C. (1996), ‘Evaluating Information Systems by Consultation and Negotiation’, International Journal of Information Management, (15) 6, 427–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avison, D.E. & Fitzgerald G., (1995), Information Systems Development: Methodologies, Tools and Techniques, (2nd ed), McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, F. P. (1987), ‘No silver bullet: essence and accidents of software engineering, Computer, 20, 4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodgson, M. (1993), ‘Organizational learning: a review of some literatures’, Organization Studies, 3, 375–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farbey, B. Land, F. & Targett, D. (1993), How to Assess Your IT Investment, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B.G. & Strauss, A.L. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory, Strategies for Qualitative Research, Aldine Publications, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, R., (1996) ‘Slipping up on route to the top’, Management Today, 1, 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayaratna, N. (1994) Understanding and Evaluating Methodologies, NIMSAD: A systematic framework, McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A.M. & Hendry, C.M., (1992) Learning Organizations: a review of literature and practice, HRD Partnership, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, J. S. (1987), Managing Systems Development (2nd ed), Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, K. (1990), ‘Post Implementation Evaluation of Computer Based Information Systems: Current Practices’, Communications of the ACM, 33(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, M.L. (1983), ‘Power, politics and MIS implementation’, Communications of the ACM, 26(6), 430–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K. and Dunn, D., (1997), ‘Post-implementation of information systems/technology: a survey of UK practice’ In proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on the Evaluation of Information Technology, Delft, October, 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, G.D., (1996), Post-investment Appraisal, in L. Willcocks (Ed.) Investing in Information Systems, 193–223, Chapman Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, C., (1993) Why Information Systems Fail: A Case Study Approach, Alfred Waller, Henley-on-Thames.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P.M., (1990), The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, Century Business, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, G. (1993), Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J., Taylor, R. & Bond, P. (1996), ‘Evaluation and realisation of IS/IT benefits: an empirical study of current practice’, European Journal of Information Systems, 4, 214–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willcocks, L. (1992), ‘Evaluating Information Technology investments: research findings and reappraisal’, Journal of Information Systems, 2, 243–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willcocks, L. & Lester, S. (1996), ‘Beyond the IT Productivity Paradox’, European Management Journal, 14(3), 279–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R., K., (1989) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, London, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Miller, K., Dunn, D. (1999). Using Past Performance to Improve Future Practice. In: Zupančič, J., Wojtkowski, W., Wojtkowski, W.G., Wrycza, S. (eds) Evolution and Challenges in System Development. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4851-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4851-5_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7200-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4851-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics