Abstract
Cell migration is a key hallmark of malignant cells that contributes to the progression of cancers from a primary, localized mass to an invasive and/or metastatic phenotype. Traditional methods for the evaluation of tumor cell migration in vitro generally employ two-dimensional (2D), homogeneous cultures that do not take into account tumor heterogeneity, three-dimensional (3D) cell-cell contacts between tumor and/or host cells or interactions with extracellular matrix proteins. Here we describe a 3D tumor spheroid-based migration assay which more accurately reflects the solid tumor microenvironment and can accommodate both extracellular matrix and host cell interactions. It is a rapid and highly reproducible 96-well plate-based technique and we demonstrate its utility for the evaluation of therapeutic agents/drugs with anti-migratory properties.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Friedl P, Hegerfeldt Y, Tusch M (2004) Collective cell migration in morphogenesis and cancer. Int J Dev Biol 48:441–449
Horwitz R, Webb D (2003) Cell migration. Curr Biol 13:R756–R759
Demir R, Yaba A, Huppertz B (2010) Vasculogenesis and angiogenesis in the endometrium during menstrual cycle and implantation. Acta Histochem 112:203–214
Lefranc F, Brotchi J, Kiss R (2005) Possible future issues in the treatment of glioblastomas: special emphasis on cell migration and the resistance of migrating glioblastoma cells to apoptosis. J Clin Oncol 23:2411–2422
Patel V, Rosenfeldt HM, Lyons R et al (2007) Persistent activation of Rac1 in squamous carcinomas of the head and neck: evidence for an EGFR/Vav2 signaling axis involved in cell invasion. Carcinogenesis 28:1145–1152
Weigelt B, Peterse JL, van’t Veer LJ (2005) Breast cancer metastasis: markers and models. Nat Rev Cancer 5:591–602
Biddle A, Mackenzie IC (2012) Cancer stem cells and EMT in carcinoma. Cancer Metastasis Rev. doi:10.1007/s10555-10012-19345-10550
Alison MR, Lim SM, Nicholson LJ (2011) Cancer stem cells: problems for therapy? J Pathol 223:147–161
Janssen HL, Haustermans KM, Balm AJ et al (2005) Hypoxia in head and neck cancer: how much, how important? Head Neck 27:622–638
Palmer TD, Ashby WJ, Lewis JD et al (2011) Targeting tumor cell motility to prevent metastasis. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 63:568–581
Vinci M, Gowan S, Boxall F et al (2012) Advances in establishment and analysis of 3D tumor spheroid-based functional assays for target validation and drug evaluation. BMC Biol 10:29. doi:10.1186/1741-7007-10-29
Ivascu A, Kubbies M (2006) Rapid generation of single-tumor spheroids for high-throughput cell function and toxicity analysis. J Biomol Screen 11:922–932
Friedrich J, Seidel C, Ebner R et al (2009) Spheroid-based drug screen: considerations and practical approach. Nat Protoc 4:309–324
Foty R (2011) A simple hanging drop cell culture protocol for generation of 3D spheroids. J Vis Exp 51:e2720
Kelm JM, Timmins NE, Brown CJ et al (2003) Method for generation of homogeneous multicellular tumor spheroids applicable to a wide variety of cell types. Biotechnol Bioeng 83:173–180
Deryugina EI, Bourdon MA (1996) Tenascin mediates human glioma cell migration and modulates cell migration on fibronectin. J Cell Sci 109:643–652
Vajkoczy P, Menger MD, Goldbrunner R et al (2000) Targeting angiogenesis inhibits tumor infiltration and expression of the pro-invasive protein SPARC. Int J Cancer 87:261–268
Friedrich J, Ebner R, Kunz-Schughart LA (2007) Experimental anti-tumor therapy in 3-D: spheroids—old hat or new challenge? Int J Radiat Biol 83:849–871
Hirschhaeuser F, Menne H, Dittfeld C et al (2010) Multicellular tumor spheroids: an underestimated tool is catching up again. J Biotechnol 148:3–15
Hood JD, Cheresh DA (2002) Role of integrins in cell invasion and migration. Nat Rev Cancer 2:91–100
Buttery RC, Rintoul RC, Sethi T (2004) Small cell lung cancer: the importance of the extracellular matrix. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 36:1154–1160
Heo K, Kim YH, Sung HJ et al (2012) Hypoxia-induced up-regulation of apelin is associated with a poor prognosis in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients. Oral Oncol. doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2011.1012.1015
Easty DM, Easty GC, Carter RL et al (1981) Ten human carcinoma cell lines derived from squamous carcinomas of the head and neck. Br J Cancer 43:772–785
Molin Y, Fayette J (2011) Current chemotherapies for recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer. Anticancer Drugs 22:621–625
Brouty-Boye D, Mainguene C, Magnien V et al (1994) Fibroblast-mediated differentiation in human breast carcinoma cells (MCF-7) grown as nodules in vitro. Int J Cancer 56:731–735
Offner FA, Wirtz HC, Schiefer J et al (1992) Interaction of human malignant melanoma (ST-ML-12) tumor spheroids with endothelial cell monolayers. Damage to endothelium by oxygen-derived free radicals. Am J Pathol 141:601–610
Vajkoczy P, Farhadi M, Gaumann A et al (2002) Microtumor growth initiates angiogenic sprouting with simultaneous expression of VEGF, VEGF receptor-2, and angiopoietin-2. J Clin Invest 109:777–785
Kenig S, Alonso MB, Mueller MM et al (2010) Glioblastoma and endothelial cells cross-talk, mediated by SDF-1, enhances tumour invasion and endothelial proliferation by increasing expression of cathepsins B, S, and MMP-9. Cancer Lett 289:53–61
Decaestecker C, Debeir O, Van Ham P et al (2007) Can anti-migratory drugs be screened in vitro? A review of 2D and 3D assays for the quantitative analysis of cell migration. Med Res Rev 27:149–176
Shoemaker RH (2006) The NCI60 human tumour cell line anticancer drug screen. Nat Rev Cancer 6:813–823
Zhang H, Lee MY, Hogg MG et al (2010) Gene delivery in three-dimensional cell cultures by superparamagnetic nanoparticles. ACS Nano 4:4733–4743
Ivascu A, Kubbies M (2007) Diversity of cell-mediated adhesions in breast cancer spheroids. Int J Oncol 31:1403–1413
Bax DA, Little SE, Gaspar N et al (2009) Molecular and phenotypic characterisation of paediatric glioma cell lines as models for preclinical drug development. PLoS One 4:e5209
Box GM, Eccles SA (2011) Simple experimental and spontaneous metastasis assays in mice. Methods Mol Biol 769:311–329
Airley R, Loncaster J, Davidson S et al (2001) Glucose transporter glut-1 expression correlates with tumor hypoxia and predicts metastasis-free survival in advanced carcinoma of the cervix. Clin Cancer Res 7:928–934
Acknowledgments
We thank Marta Mendiola for preliminary CALR and CALS migration data. This work was funded by The National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (G1000121 ID no. 94513). C.B. and M.Z. are supported by grants from the Oracle Cancer Trust. S.E. is supported by The Institute of Cancer Research and Cancer Research UK grant number C309/A8274. We acknowledge NHS funding to the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 SpringerScience+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Vinci, M., Box, C., Zimmermann, M., Eccles, S.A. (2013). Tumor Spheroid-Based Migration Assays for Evaluation of Therapeutic Agents. In: Moll, J., Colombo, R. (eds) Target Identification and Validation in Drug Discovery. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 986. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-311-4_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-311-4_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-310-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-311-4
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols