Skip to main content

Humanizing Intensive Care: Theory, Evidence, and Possibilities

  • Chapter
Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2016

Abstract

Intensive care units (ICUs) are showcases for many of the most stunning technological advances in medicine. Survival from once routinely fatal diseases is rapidly increasing [1]. Unfortunately, the severity of illness and the invasiveness of intensive therapies can make the ICU a brutal place for all involved [2, 3]. Patients report violations of their dignity and most survivors and family members experience symptoms of anxiety, depression, or posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) [4]. For patients who die in or shortly after the ICU stay, many of the deaths will have been deformed by an overemphasis on medical technology [5]. ICU admission may threaten the individual’s sense of self, both from the threat of annihilation through death and the dehumanization attendant to critical illness, its treatments, and clinician behaviors [2]. The sometimes brutal realities of contemporary ICU care are generating appropriate debates about how to humanize the ICU. Several possible solutions have been proposed [6], but the topic has often been associated with a lack of clear thinking, particularly in the ICU.

The dehumanization of the ICU has persisted for many reasons, including structural/ organizational problems and defense mechanisms and cognitive errors on the part of clinicians. These cognitive errors are understandable, even predictable. The ICU is stressful and disorienting enough that all participants – clinicians, patients, and families – are prone to misperceive the situation in ways that contribute to dehumanization. While clinician diagnostic errors have been well described by cognitive psychologists in recent decades [7], the risks of misapprehension and cognitive errors related to human aspects of the ICU experience are also endemic and merit consideration. Increasingly sophisticated work in cognitive psychology and judgment and decision making may shed considerable light on the problems of dehumanization in the ICU. In this chapter, we consider theory, evidence, and early solutions with an eye toward clarifying the cognitive errors and blind spots that often interfere with humanization in the ICU.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Zimmerman JE, Kramer AA, Knaus WA (2013) Changes in hospital mortality for United States intensive care unit admissions from 1988 to 2012. Crit Care 17:R81

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown SM (2016) Through the Valley of Shadows: Living Wills, Intensive Care, and Making Medicine Human. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alonso-Ovies A, Heras La Calle G (2016) ICU: a branch of hell? Intensive Care Med (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Needham DM, Davidson J, Cohen H et al (2012) Improving long-term outcomes after discharge from intensive care unit: report from a stakeholders' conference. Crit Care Med 40:502–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Callahan D (1993) The Troubled Dream of Life: in Search of Peaceful Death. Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Haque OS, Waytz A (2012) Dehumanization in medicine: causes, solutions, and functions. Perspect Psychol Sci 7:176–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Singh H, Petersen LA, Thomas EJ (2006) Understanding diagnostic errors in medicine: a lesson from aviation. Qual Saf Health Care 15:159–164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Taylor C (2007) A Secular Age. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  9. Katz J (1984) The Silent World of Doctor and Patient. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rosenbaum L (2015) The paternalism preference – choosing unshared decision making. N Engl J Med 373:589–592

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Haslam N (2006) Dehumanization: an integrative review. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 10:252–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nelson H, Nelson J (1995) The Patient in the Family: An Ethics of Medicine and Families. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Netzer G, Sullivan DR (2014) Recognizing, naming, and measuring a family intensive care unit syndrome. Ann Am Thorac Soc 11:435–441

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Aboumatar H, Forbes L, Branyon E et al (2015) Understanding treatment with respect and dignity in the intensive care unit. Narrat Inq Bioeth 5:55A–67A

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Frosch DL, Tai-Seale M (2014) R-E-S-P-E-C-T – what it means to patients. J Gen Intern Med 29:427–428

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lynn J, Harrell F Jr, Cohn F, Wagner D, Connors AF Jr (1997) Prognoses of seriously ill hospitalized patients on the days before death: implications for patient care and public policy. New Horiz 5:56–61

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zier LS, Sottile, Hong SY, Weissfield LA, White DB (2012) Surrogate decision makers' interpretation of prognostic information: a mixed-methods study. Ann Intern Med 156:360–366

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Keegan MT, Gajic O, Afessa B (2011) Severity of illness scoring systems in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 39:163–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rocker G, Cook D, Sjokvist P et al (2004) Clinician predictions of intensive care unit mortality. Crit Care Med 32:1149–1154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Turner VW (1964) Betwixt and between: the liminal period in rites de passage. The Proceedings of the American Ethnological Society 1964:4–20

    Google Scholar 

  21. Embriaco N, Papazian L, Kentish-Barnes N, Pochard F, Azoulay E (2007) Burnout syndrome among critical care healthcare workers. Curr Opin Crit Care 13:482–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vaes J, Muratore M (2013) Defensive dehumanization in the medical practice: a cross-sectional study from a health care worker's perspective. Br J Soc Psychol 52:180–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Haslam N (2007) Humanizing medical practice: the role of empathy. Med J Aust 187:381–382

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Carman KL, Dardess P, Maurer M et al (2013) Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Aff (Millwood) 32:223–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Herrin J, Harris KG, Kenward K, Hines S, Joshi MS, Frosch DL (2016) Patient and family engagement: a survey of US hospital practices. BMJ Qual Saf (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Brown SM, Rozenblum R, Aboumatar H et al (2015) Defining patient and family engagement in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 191:358–360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sullivan DR, Liu X, Corwin DS et al (2012) Learned helplessness among families and surrogate decision-makers of patients admitted to medical, surgical, and trauma ICUs. Chest 142:1440–1446

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Brown SM (2015) We still lack patient centered visitation in intensive care units. BMJ 350:h792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Davidson JE, Powers K, Hedayat KM et al (2007) Clinical practice guidelines for support of the family in the patient-centered intensive care unit: American College of Critical Care Medicine Task Force 2004–2005. Crit Care Med 35:605–622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Davidson JE, Daly BJ, Agan D, Brady NR, Higgins PA (2010) Facilitated sensemaking: a feasibility study for the provision of a family support program in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Nurs Q 33:177–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jabre P, Tazarourte K, Azoulay E et al (2014) Offering the opportunity for family to be present during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: 1-year assessment. Intensive Care Med 40:981–987

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cook D, Swinton M, Toledo F et al (2015) Personalizing death in the intensive care unit: the 3 wishes project: a mixed-methods study. Ann Intern Med 163:271–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sokol-Hessner L, Folcarelli PH, Sands KE (2015) Emotional harm from disrespect: the neglected preventable harm. BMJ Qual Saf 24:550–553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schneider CE (1998) The Practice of Autonomy: Patients, Doctors, and Medical Decisions. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jesus JE, Allen MB, Michael GE et al (2013) Preferences for resuscitation and intubation among patients with do-not-resuscitate/do-not-intubate orders. Mayo Clin Proc 88:658–665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lautrette A, Darmon M, Megarbane B et al (2007) A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU. N Engl J Med 356:469–478

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Shaw DJ, Davidson JE, Smilde RI, Sondoozi T, Agan D (2014) Multidisciplinary team training to enhance family communication in the ICU. Crit Care Med 42:265–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Curtis JR, Back AL, Ford DW et al (2013) Effect of communication skills training for residents and nurse practitioners on quality of communication with patients with serious illness: a randomized trial. JAMA 310:2271–2281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. McDonagh JR, Elliott TB, Engelberg RA et al (2004) Family satisfaction with family conferences about end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: increased proportion of family speech is associated with increased satisfaction. Crit Care Med 32:1484–1488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Azoulay E, Pochard F, Chevret S et al (2002) Impact of a family information leaflet on effectiveness of information provided to family members of intensive care unit patients: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 165:438–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lilly CM, De Meo DL, Sonna LA et al (2000) An intensive communication intervention for the critically ill. Am J Med 109:469–475

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Turnbull AE, Krall JR, Ruhl AP et al (2014) A scenario-based, randomized trial of patient values and functional prognosis on intensivist intent to discuss withdrawing life support. Crit Care Med 42:1455–1462

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Cox CE, White DB, Abernethy AP (2014) A universal decision support system. Addressing the decision-making needs of patients, families, and clinicians in the setting of critical illness. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 190:366–373

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Billings JA (2012) The need for safeguards in advance care planning. J Gen Intern Med 27:595–600

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Cox CE, Porter LS, Hough CL et al (2012) Development and preliminary evaluation of a telephone-based coping skills training intervention for survivors of acute lung injury and their informal caregivers. Intensive Care Med 38:1289–1297

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Garrouste-Orgeas M, Coquet I, Perier A et al (2012) Impact of an intensive care unit diary on psychological distress in patients and relatives. Crit Care Med 40:2033–2040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Curtis JR, Ciechanowski PS, Downey L et al (2012) Development and evaluation of an interprofessional communication intervention to improve family outcomes in the ICU. Contemp Clin Trials 33:1245–1254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. White DB, Cua SM, Walk R et al (2012) Nurse-led intervention to improve surrogate decision making for patients with advanced critical illness. Am J Crit Care 21:396–409

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Mikkelsen ME, Iwashyna TJ, Thompson C (2015) Why ICU clinicians need to care about post-intensive care syndrome. SCCM Critical Connections Aug 4

    Google Scholar 

  50. Webster P, Johnson B (2000) Developing and Sustaining a Patient and Family Advisory Council. Institute for Family-Centered Care, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. M. Brown .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brown, S.M., Beesley, S.J., Hopkins, R.O. (2016). Humanizing Intensive Care: Theory, Evidence, and Possibilities. In: Vincent, JL. (eds) Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2016. Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27349-5_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27349-5_33

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27348-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27349-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics