Skip to main content

MMSE Variants and Subscores

  • Chapter
Cognitive Screening Instruments

Abstract

The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is long established as an instrument for the screening of cognitive complaints. Its utility has prompted the development of a number of variants and subscores. Of the MMSE variants, many are shorter than the original MMSE (e.g. Codex, Six Item Screener) to facilitate use in time-limited situations, such as primary care, but hopefully without loss of clinical utility. In contrast, the Modified MMSE or 3MS is longer, assessing a broader range of cognitive functions. MMSE adaptations for those with hearing or visual impairment, for telephone use, and to identify cognitive problems specific to Parkinson’s disease have been designed. MMSE subscores which may help to identify vascular dementia and dementia with Lewy bodies have also been described. These MMSE variants and subscores provide additional tools for the assessment of cognitive complaints, sometimes related to specific clinical situations. There are fewer data regarding their use than for the MMSE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-Mental State”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tombaugh TN, McIntyre NJ. The Mini-Mental State Examination: a comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40:922–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mossello E, Boncinelli M. Mini-Mental State Examination: a 30-year story. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2006;18:271–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Steis MR, Schrauf RW. A review of translations and adaptations of the Mini-Mental State Examination in languages other than English and Spanish. Res Gerontol Nurs. 2009;2:214–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Parker C, Philp I. Screening for cognitive impairment among older people in black and minority ethnic groups. Age Ageing. 2004;33:447–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Anthony JC, LeResche L, Niaz U, Von Korff MR, Folstein MF. Limits of the “Mini-Mental State” as a screening test for dementia and delirium among hospital patients. Psychol Med. 1982;12:397–408.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wind AW, Schellevis FG, Van Staveren G, Scholten RP, Jonker C, Van Eijk JT. Limitations of the Mini-Mental State Examination in diagnosing dementia in general practice. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1987;12:101–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Feher EP, Mahurin RK, Doody RS, Cooke N, Sims J, Pirozzolo FJ. Establishing the limits of the Mini-Mental State. Examination of ‘subtests’. Arch Neurol. 1992;49:87–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Benedict RH, Brandt J. Limitation of the Mini-Mental State Examination for the detection of amnesia. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 1992;5:233–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Crum RM, Anthony JC, Bassett SS, Folstein MF. Population-based norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination by age and educational level. JAMA. 1993;269:2386–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Measso G, Cavarzeran F, Zappala G, et al. The Mini-Mental State Examination – normative study of an Italian random sample. Dev Neuropsychol. 1993;9:77–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Magni E, Binetti G, Bianchetti A, Rozzini R. Mini-Mental State Examination: a normative study in Italian elderly population. Eur J Neurol. 1996;3:198–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Newman JC, Feldman R. Copyright and open access at the bedside. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:2447–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nieuwenhuis-Mark RE. The death knoll for the MMSE: has it outlived its purpose? J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2010;23:151–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Carnero-Pardo C. Should the Mini-Mental State Examination be retired? Neurologia. 2014;29:473–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Carnero-Pardo C. Reasons for retiring the Mini-Mental State Examination. Neurologia. 2015;30:588–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Seshadri M, Mazi-Kotwal N. A copyright-free alternative is needed. BMJ. 2012;345, e8589.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Newman JC. Copyright and bedside cognitive testing: why we need alternatives to the Mini-Mental State Examination. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175:1459–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mathuranath PS, Nestor PJ, Berrios GE, Rakowicz W, Hodges JR. A brief cognitive test battery to differentiate Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia. Neurology. 2000;55:1613–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mioshi E, Dawson K, Mitchell J, Arnold R, Hodges JR. The Addenbrooke’s cognitive examination revised: a brief cognitive test battery for dementia screening. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006;21:1078–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hsieh S, Schubert S, Hoon C, Mioshi E, Hodges JR. Validation of the Addenbrooke’s cognitive examination III in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2013;36:242–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hsieh S, McGrory S, Leslie F, et al. The mini-Addenbrooke’s cognitive examination: a new assessment tool for dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2015;39:1–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rawle M, Larner A. MoCA subscores to diagnose dementia subtypes: initial study. J Neurol Neursurg Psychiatry. 2014;85:e4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Molloy DW, Alemayehu E, Roberts R. Reliability of a standardized Mini-Mental State Examination compared with the traditional Mini-Mental State Examination. Am J Psych. 1991;148:102–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Molloy DW, Standish TI. A guide to the standardized Mini-Mental State Examination. Int Psychogeriatr. 1997;9(Suppl1):87–94; discussion 143–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Vertesi A, Lever JA, Molloy DW, et al. Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination. Use and interpretation. Can Fam Physician. 2001;47:2018–23.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Ward A, Caro JJ, Kelley H, Eggleston A, Molloy W. Describing cognitive decline of patients at the mild or moderate stages of Alzheimer’s disease using the standardized MMSE. Int Psychogeriatr. 2002;14:249–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Molloy DW, Standish TI, Lewis DL. Screening for mild cognitive impairment: comparing the SMMSE and the ABCS. Can J Psychiatry. 2005;50:52–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. O’Caoimh R, Gao Y, McGlade C, et al. Comparison of the quick mild cognitive impairment (Qmci) screen and the SMMSE in screening for mild cognitive impairment. Age Ageing. 2012;41:624–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Lacy M, Kaemmerer T, Czipri S. Standardized mini-mental state examination scores and verbal memory performance at a memory center: implications for cognitive screening. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2015;30:145–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lobo A, Saz P, Marcos G, et al. Revalidation and standardization of the cognition mini-exam (first Spanish version of the Mini-Mental Status Examination) in the general geriatric population [in Spanish]. Med Clín (Barc). 1999;112:767–74.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Amaducci L, Baldereschi M, Amato MP, et al. The world health organization cross-national research program on age-associated dementias. Aging (Milano). 1991;3:89–96 [Erratum Aging (Milano). 1991;3:VI].

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Prieto G, Contador I, Tapias-Merino E, Mitchell AJ, Bermejo-Pareja F. The mini-mental-37 test for dementia screening in the Spanish population: an analysis using the rasch model. Clin Neuropsychol. 2012;26:1003–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Teng EL, Chui HC. The Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) examination. J Clin Psychiatry. 1987;48:314–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bassuk SS, Murphy JM. Characteristics of the Modified Mini-Mental State Exam among elderly persons. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:622–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Heckbert SR, Longsteth Jr WT, Psaty BM, et al. The association of antihypertensive agents with MRI white matter findings and with Modified Mini-Mental State Examination in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45:1423–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rapp SR, Espeland MA, Hogan P, et al. Baseline experience with Modified Mini Mental State Exam: the Women’s Health Initiative Memory Study (WHIMS). Aging Ment Health. 2003;7:217–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. McDowell I, Kristjansson B, Hill GB, Hebert R. Community screening for dementia: the Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) and Modified Mini-Mental State Exam (3MS) compared. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:377–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bland RC, Newman SC. Mild dementia or cognitive impairment: the Modified Mini-Mental State examination (3MS) as a screen for dementia. Can J Psychiatry. 2001;46:506–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bravo G, Hebert R. Age- and education-specific reference values for the Mini-Mental and modified Mini-Mental State Examinations derived from a non-demented population. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1997;12:1008–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tombaugh TN. Test-retest reliable coefficient and 5-year change scores for the MMSE and 3MS. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2005;20:485–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Jones TG, Schinka JA, Vanderploeg RD, Small BJ, Graves AB, Mortimer JA. 3MS normative data for the elderly. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2002;17:171–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Brown LM, Schinka JA, Mortimer JA, Graves AB. 3MS normative data for elderly African Americans. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2003;25:234–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Tschanz JT, Welsh-Bohmer KA, Plassman PL, et al. An adaptation of the modified mini-mental state examination: analysis of demographic influences and normative data: the cache county study. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol. 2002;15:28–38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Alexopoulos P, Nadler K, Cramer B, Herpertz SC, Kurz A. Validation of a short test (3MS-R) for detecting Alzheimer’s disease [in German]. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2007;75:728–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Loewenstein DA, Barker WW, Harwood DG, et al. Utility of a modified Mini-Mental State Examination with extended delayed recall in screening for mild cognitive impairment and dementia among community dwelling elders. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2000;15:434–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Tangalos EG, Smith GE, Ivnik RJ, et al. The Mini-Mental State Examination in general medical practice: clinical utility and acceptance. Mayo Clinic Proc. 1996;71:829–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Ashford JW. Screening for memory disorders, dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Aging Health. 2008;4:399–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Cefalu CA. The 28-point mini-mental status examination. Md Med J. 1994;43:431.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Magaziner J, Bassett SS, Hebel JR. Predicting performance on the Mini-Mental State Examination. Use of age- and education-specific equations. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1987;35:996–1000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Matthews FE, Stephan BC, Khaw KT, et al. Full-scale scores of the Mini Mental State Examination can be generated from an abbreviated version. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1005–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ashford JW, Kolm P, Colliver JA, Bekian C, Hsu LN. Alzheimer patient evaluation and the mini-mental state: item characteristic curve analysis. J Gerontol. 1989;44:P139–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Fillenbaum GG, Wilkinson WE, Welsh KA, Mohs RC. Discrimination between stages of Alzheimer’s disease with subsets of Mini-Mental State Examination items. An analysis of consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer’s disease data. Arch Neurol. 1994;51:916–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Galasko D, Klauber MR, Hofstetter CR, Salmon DP, Lasker B, Thal LJ. The Mini-Mental State Examination in the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Arch Neurol. 1990;47:49–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Braekhus A, Laake K, Engedal K. The Mini-Mental State Examination: identifying the most efficient variables for detecting cognitive impairment in the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40:1139–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Belmin J, Pariel-Madjlessi S, Surun P, et al. The cognitive disorders examination (Codex) is a reliable 3-minute test for detection of dementia in the elderly (validation study in 323 subjects). Presse Med. 2007;36:1183–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Larner AJ. Codex (cognitive disorders examination) for the detection of dementia and mild cognitive impairment. Codex pour la détection de la démence et du mild cognitive impairment. Presse Med. 2013;42:e425–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Onishi J, Suzuki Y, Umegaki H, Kawamura T, Imaizumi M, Iguchi A. Which two questions of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) should we start from? Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2007;44:43–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Paveza GJ, Cohen D, Blaser CJ, Hapogian M. A brief form of the Mini-Mental State Examination for use in community care settings. Behav Health Aging. 1990;1:133–9.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Koenig HG. An abbreviated Mini-Mental State Exam for medically ill older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996;44:215–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Callahan CM, Unverzagt FW, Hui SL, Perkins AJ, Hendrie HC. Six-item screener to identify cognitive impairment among potential subjects for clinical research. Med Care. 2002;40:771–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Mitchell AJ, Malladi S. Screening and case-finding tools for the detection of dementia. Part I: evidence-based meta-analysis of multidomain tests. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010;18:759–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Chen MR, Guo QH, Cao XY, Hong Z, Liu XH. A preliminary study of the Six-item screener in detecting cognitive impairment. Neurosci Bull. 2010;26:317–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Wilber ST, Carpenter CR, Hustey FM. The Six-item screener to detect cognitive impairment in older emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15:613–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Galvin JE, Roe CM, Powlishta KK, et al. The AD8: a brief informant interview to detect dementia. Neurology. 2005;65:559–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Galvin JE, Roe CM, Coats MA, Morris JC. Patient’s rating of cognitive ability: using the AD8, a brief informant interview, as a self-rating tool to detect dementia. Arch Neurol. 2007;64:725–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Carpenter CR, DesPain B, Keeling TN, Shah M, Rothenberger M. The Six-item screener and AD8 for the detection of cognitive impairment in geriatric emergency department patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;57:653–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Ramlall S, Chipps J, Bhigjee AI, Pillay BJ. The sensitivity and specificity of subjective memory complaints and the subjective memory rating scale, deterioration cognitive observee [sic], mini-mental state examination, six-item screener and clock drawing test in dementia screening. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2013;36:119–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Carcaillon L, Amieva H, Auriacombe S, Helmer C, Dartigues JF. A subtest of the MMSE as a valid test of episodic memory? comparison with the free and cued reminding test. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2009;27:429–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Dubois B, Touchon J, Portet F, Ousset PJ, Vellas B, Michel B. “The 5 words”: a simple and sensitive test for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease [in French]. Presse Med. 2002;31:1696–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Commenges D, Gagnon M, Letenneur L, Dartigues JF, Barberger-Gateau P, Salamon R. Improving screening for dementia in the elderly using, Mini-Mental State Examination subscores, Benton’s visual retention test, and Isaacs’ set test. Epidemiology. 1992;3:185–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Clionsky MI, Clionsky E. Development and validation of the Memory Orientation Screening Test (MOST™): a better screening test for dementia. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2010;25:650–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Teresi JA. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE): scaling the MMSE using item response theory (IRT). J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:256–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Schultz-Larsen K, Lomholt RK, Kreiner S. Mini-Mental Status Examination: a short form of MMSE was as accurate as the original MMSE in predicting dementia. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:260–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Haubois G, Annweiler C, Launay C, Fantino B, de Decker L, Allali G, Beauchet O. Development of a short form of Mini-Mental State Examination for the screening of dementia in older adults with a memory complaint: a case control study. BMC Geriatr. 2001;11:59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Haubois G, de Decker L, Annweiler C, et al. Derivation and validation of a short form of the Mini-Mental State Examination for the screening of dementia in older adults with a memory complaint. Eur J Neurol. 2013;20:588–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Kim TH, Jhoo JH, Park JH, et al. Korean version of mini mental status examination for dementia screening and its short form. Psychiatry Investig. 2010;7:102–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Harrell LE, Marson D, Chatterjee A, Parrish JA. The Severe Mini-Mental State Examination: a new neuropsychologic instrument for the bedside assessment of severely impaired patients with Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2000;14:168–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Tate RL. A compendium of tests, scales, and questionnaires:the practitioner’s guide to measuring outcomes after acquired brain impairment. Hove: Psychology Press; 2010. p. 170.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Buiza C, Navarro A, Diaz-Orueta U, et al. Short evaluation of cognitive state in advanced stages of dementia: preliminary results of the spanish validation of the severe Mini-Mental State Examination [in Spanish]. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2011;46:131–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Wajman JR, Oliveira FF, Schultz RR, Marin Sde M, Bertolucci PH. Educational bias in the assessment of severe dementia: Brazilian cutoffs for severe Mini-Mental State Examination. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2014;72:273–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Raiha I, Isoaho R, Ojanlatva A, Viramo P, Sulkava R, Kivela SL. Poor performance in the mini-mental state examination due to causes other than dementia. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2011;19:34–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Uhlmann RF, Teri L, Rees TS, Mozlowski KJ, Larson EB. Impact of mild to moderate hearing loss on mental status testing. Comparability of standard and written Mini-Mental State Examinations. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1989;37:223–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Dean PM, Feldman DM, Morere D, Morton D. Clinical evaluation of the mini-mental state exam with culturally deaf senior citizens. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2009;24:753–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. De Silva ML, McLaughlin MT, Rodrigues EJ, Broadbent JC, Gray AR, Hammond-Tooke GD. A Mini-Mental Status Examination for the hearing impaired. Age Ageing. 2008;37:593–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Busse A, Sonntag A, Bischkopf J, Matschinger H, Angermeyer MC. Adaptation of dementia screening for vision-impaired older persons: administration of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55:909–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Jefferis J, Collerton J, Taylor JP, et al. The impact of visual impairment on Mini-Mental State Examination scores in the Newcastle 85+ study. Age Ageing. 2012;41:565–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Martin-Khan M, Wootton R, Gray L. A systematic review of the reliability of screening for cognitive impairment in older adults by use of standardised assessment tools administered via the telephone. J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16:422–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Castanho TC, Amorim L, Zihl J, Palha JA, Sousa N, Santos NC. Telephone-based screening tools for mild cognitive impairment and dementia in aging studies: a review of validated instruments. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014;6:16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Roccaforte WH, Burke WJ, Bayer BL, Wengel SP. Validation of a telephone version of the mini-mental state examination. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40:697–702.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Newkirk LA, Kim JM, Thompson JM, Tinklenberg JR, Yesavage JA, Taylor JL. Validation of a 26-point telephone version of the Mini-Mental State Examination. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2004;17:81–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Kennedy RE, Williams CP, Sawyer P, Allman RM, Crowe M. Comparison of in-person and telephone administration of the Mini-Mental State Examination in the university of Alabama at Birmingham study of aging. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62:1928–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Metitieri T, Geroldi C, Pezzini A, Frisoni GB, Bianchetti A, Trabucchi M. The itel-MMSE: an Italian telephone version of the Mini-Mental State Examination. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2001;16:166–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Vanacore N, De Carolis A, Sepe-Monti M, et al. Validity of the Italian telephone version of the mini-mental state examination in the elderly healthy population. Acta Neurol Belg. 2006;106:132–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Garre-Olmo J, Lax-Pericall C, Turro-Garriga O, et al. Adaptation and convergent validity of a telephone-based Mini-Mental State Examination [in Spanish]. Med Clin (Barc). 2008;131:89–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Norton MC, Tschanz JA, Fan X, et al. Telephone adaptation of the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS). The cache county study. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol. 1999;12:270–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Ciemins EL, Holloway B, Con PJ, McClosky-Armstrong T, Min SJ. Telemedicine and the Mini-Mental State Examination: assessment from a distance. Telemed J E Health. 2009;15:476–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Jefferson AL, Cosentino SA, Ball SK, et al. Errors produced on the mini-mental state examination and neuropsychological test performance in Alzheimer’s disease, ischemic vascular dementia, and Parkinson’s disease. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2002;14:311–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Mahieux F, Michelet D, Manifacier M-J, Boller F, Fermanian J, Guillard A. Mini-Mental Parkinson: first validation study of a new bedside test constructed for Parkinson’s disease. Behav Neurol. 1995;8:15–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Parrao-Diaz T, Chana-Cuevas P, Juri-Claverias C, Kunstmann C, Tapia-Nunez J. Evaluation of cognitive impairment in a population of patients with Parkinson’s disease by means of the mini mental Parkinson test [in Spanish]. Rev Neurol. 2005;40:339–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Serrano-Dueñas M, Calero B, Serrano S, Serrano M, Coronel P. Metric properties of the mini-mental Parkinson and SCOPA-COG scales for rating cognitive deterioration in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2010;25:2555–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Zhelev YE, Raycheva MR, Petrova MI, Traykov LD. Cognitive decline in a longitudinally followed group of patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Eur J Neurol. 2010;17(Suppl3):97 (abstract P1066).

    Google Scholar 

  103. Larner AJ. Is Mini-Mental Parkinson (MMP) a useful screening test in a cognitive clinic population? Eur J Neurol. 2010;17 Suppl 3:205 (abstract P1342).

    Google Scholar 

  104. Caslake CR, Summers F, McConachie D, et al. The Mini-Mental Parkinson’s (MMP) as a cognitive screening tool in people with Parkinson’s disease. Curr Aging Sci. 2013;6:273–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Isella V, Mapelli C, Morielli N, et al. Validity and metric of MiniMental Parkinson and MiniMental State Examination in Parkinson’s disease. Neurol Sci. 2013;34:1751–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Larner AJ. Mini-Mental Parkinson (MMP) as a dementia screening test: comparison with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Curr Aging Sci. 2012;5:136–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Larner AJ. Comparing diagnostic accuracy of cognitive screening instruments: a weighted comparison approach. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Extra. 2013;3:60–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Larner AJ. Effect size (Cohen’s d) of cognitive screening instruments examined in pragmatic diagnostic accuracy studies. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Extra. 2014;4:236–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Magni E, Binetti G, Padovani A, Cappa SF, Bianchetti A, Trabucchi M. The Mini-Mental State Examination in Alzheimer’s disease and multi-infarct dementia. Int Psychogeriatr. 1996;8:127–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Ala T, Hughes LF, Kyrouac GA, Ghobrial MW, Elble RJ. The Mini-Mental State exam may help in the differentiation of dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2002;17:503–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Salmon DP, Galasko D, Hansen LA, et al. Neuropsychological deficits associated with diffuse Lewy body disease. Brain Cogn. 1996;31:148–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Downes JJ, Priestley NM, Doran M, Ferran J, Ghadiali E, Cooper P. Intellectual, mnemonic and frontal functions in dementia with Lewy bodies: a comparison with early and advanced Parkinson’s disease. Behav Neurol. 1998;11:173–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Calderon J, Perry R, Erzinclioglu S, Berrios GE, Dening T, Hodges JR. Perception, attention and working memory are disproportionately impaired in dementia with Lewy body (LBD) compared to Alzheimer’s disease (AD). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;70:157–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. Hanyu H, Shimizu S, Hirao K, et al. Differentiation of dementia with Lewy bodies from Alzheimer’s disease using Mini-Mental State Examination and brain perfusion SPECT. J Neurol Sci. 2006;250:97–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Larner AJ. MMSE subscores and the diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2003;18:855–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Larner AJ. Use of MMSE to differentiate Alzheimer’s disease from dementia with Lewy bodies. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004;19:1209–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Palmqvist S, Hansson O, Minthon L, Londos E. Practical suggestions on how to differentiate dementia with Lewy bodies from Alzheimer’s disease with common cognitive tests. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009;24:1405–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew J. Larner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Larner, A.J. (2017). MMSE Variants and Subscores. In: Larner, A.J. (eds) Cognitive Screening Instruments. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44775-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44775-9_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44774-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44775-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics