Abstract
For drug administration in anesthesia practice, the goal is to achieve a desired and stable clinical effect, which requires accurate control of blood and brain drug concentrations. For intravenous drugs, commercial medical devices are unavailable to measure the drug concentrations. Instead, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models are used to estimate plasma and effect-site concentrations of intravenous drugs. In the case that two or more models are available, one model has to be selected. The model applicability should be considered with their internal and external validity. For the evaluation of the pharmacokinetic model performance, metrics derived from percentage performance error are used such as “median performance error” indicating the bias, “median absolute performance error” indicating the inaccuracy, “divergence” showing the shift of performance error or absolute performance error against time, and “wobble” showing the intraindividual variability of the prediction error. Visual inspection of the goodness of fit plots is also applied for the model evaluation. In the prediction of drug concentration in a patient, the background of the model and applied patient such as patient characteristics influences the predictive performance of the model. For the model application for a patient, a model will be selected from available models in the commercial devices or from all published models by the recommendation of someone or the user of the model. For the model selection, variable information such as the results of the model evaluation, the background of the model, the background of the patient and dosing plan, and the data set are used for the external validation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Takita A, Masui K, Kazama T. On-line monitoring of end-tidal propofol concentration in anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology. 2007;106(4):659–64. doi:10.1097/01.anes.0000264745.63275.59. 00000542-200704000-00006 [pii].
Liu B, Pettigrew DM, Bates S, Laitenberger PG, Troughton G. Performance evaluation of a whole blood propofol analyser. J Clin Monit Comput. 2012;26(1):29–36. doi:10.1007/s10877-011-9330-0.
Marsh B, White M, Morton N, Kenny GN. Pharmacokinetic model driven infusion of propofol in children. Br J Anaesth. 1991;67(1):41–8.
Sigl JC, Chamoun NG. An introduction to bispectral analysis for the electroencephalogram. J Clin Monit. 1994;10(6):392–404.
Flaishon R, Windsor A, Sigl J, Sebel PS. Recovery of consciousness after thiopental or propofol. Bispectral index and isolated forearm technique. Anesthesiology. 1997;86(3):613–9.
Derendorf H, Meibohm B. Modeling of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationships: concepts and perspectives. Pharm Res. 1999;16(2):176–85.
Williams PJ, Kim YH, Ette EI. The epistemology of pharmacometrics. In: Ette EI, Williams PJ, editors. Pharmacometrics: the science of quantitative pharmacology. Hoboken: Wiley; 2007. p. 223–44.
Short TG, Aun CS, Tan P, Wong J, Tam YH, Oh TE. A prospective evaluation of pharmacokinetic model controlled infusion of propofol in paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth. 1994;72(3):302–6.
Sepulveda P, Cortinez LI, Saez C, Penna A, Solari S, Guerra I, Absalom AR. Performance evaluation of paediatric propofol pharmacokinetic models in healthy young children. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107(4):593–600. doi:10.1093/bja/aer198.
Williams PJ, Kim YH. Resampling techniques and their application to pharmacometrics. In: Ette EI, Williams PJ, editors. Pharmacometrics: the science of quantitative pharmacology. Hoboken: Wiley; 2007. p. 401–19.
Bergstrand M, Hooker AC, Wallin JE, Karlsson MO. Prediction-corrected visual predictive checks for diagnosing nonlinear mixed-effects models. AAPS J. 2011;13(2):143–51. doi:10.1208/s12248-011-9255-z.
Yano Y, Beal SL, Sheiner LB. Evaluating pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models using the posterior predictive check. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2001;28(2):171–92.
Varvel JR, Donoho DL, Shafer SL. Measuring the predictive performance of computer-controlled infusion pumps. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1992;20(1):63–94.
Alvis JM, Reves JG, Govier AV, Menkhaus PG, Henling CE, Spain JA, Bradley E. Computer-assisted continuous infusions of fentanyl during cardiac anesthesia: comparison with a manual method. Anesthesiology. 1985;63(1):41–9.
Ausems ME, Stanski DR, Hug CC. An evaluation of the accuracy of pharmacokinetic data for the computer assisted infusion of alfentanil. Br J Anaesth. 1985;57(12):1217–25.
Schwilden H. A general method for calculating the dosage scheme in linear pharmacokinetics. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1981;20(5):379–86.
Glen JB. The development of ‘Diprifusor’: a TCI system for propofol. Anaesthesia. 1998;53 Suppl 1:13–21.
Owen JS, Fiedler-Kelly J. Population model concepts and terminology. In: Introduction to population pharmacokinetic/pharmacokinetic analysis with nonlinear mixed effects models. Hoboken: Wiley; 2014. p. 9–27.
Glen JB, Servin F. Evaluation of the predictive performance of four pharmacokinetic models for propofol. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102(5):626–32. doi:10.1093/bja/aep043.
Glass PS, Shafer S, Reves JG. Intravenous drug delivery systems. In: Miller RD, editor. Miller’s anesthesia. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier (Churchill Livinstone); 2004, p. 439–80.
Schuttler J, Kloos S, Schwilden H, Stoeckel H. Total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and alfentanil by computer-assisted infusion. Anaesthesia. 1988;43(Suppl):2–7.
Masui K, Upton RN, Doufas AG, Coetzee JF, Kazama T, Mortier EP, Struys MM. The performance of compartmental and physiologically based recirculatory pharmacokinetic models for propofol: a comparison using bolus, continuous, and target-controlled infusion data. Anesth Analg. 2010;111(2):368–79. doi:10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181bdcf5b.
Coppens M, Van Limmen JG, Schnider T, Wyler B, Bonte S, Dewaele F, Struys MM, Vereecke HE. Study of the time course of the clinical effect of propofol compared with the time course of the predicted effect-site concentration: performance of three pharmacokinetic-dynamic models. Br J Anaesth. 2010;104(4):452–8. doi:10.1093/bja/aeq028.
Struys MMRF, Absalom AR, Shafer SL. Intravenous drug delivery system. In: Miller RD, editor. Miller’s anesthesia, vol. 1. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2015. p. 919–57.
Kurita T, Kazama T, Morita K, Fujii S, Uraoka M, Takata K, Sato S. Influence of fluid infusion associated with high-volume blood loss on plasma propofol concentrations. Anesthesiology. 2004;100(4):871–8. discussion 875A-876A.
Kurita T, Morita K, Kazama T, Sato S. Influence of cardiac output on plasma propofol concentrations during constant infusion in swine. Anesthesiology. 2002;96(6):1498–503.
Kurita T, Uraoka M, Jiang Q, Suzuki M, Morishima Y, Morita K, Sato S. Influence of cardiac output on the pseudo-steady state remifentanil and propofol concentrations in swine. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013;57(6):754–60. doi:10.1111/aas.12076.
Coetzee JF, Glen JB, Wium CA, Boshoff L. Pharmacokinetic model selection for target controlled infusions of propofol. Assessment of three parameter sets. Anesthesiology. 1995;82(6):1328–45.
Coppens MJ, Eleveld DJ, Proost JH, Marks LA, Van Bocxlaer JF, Vereecke H, Absalom AR, Struys MM. An evaluation of using population pharmacokinetic models to estimate pharmacodynamic parameters for propofol and bispectral index in children. Anesthesiology. 2011;115(1):83–93. doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e31821a8d80.
Masui K, Kira M, Kazama T, Hagihira S, Mortier EP, Struys MM. Early phase pharmacokinetics but not pharmacodynamics are influenced by propofol infusion rate. Anesthesiology. 2009;111(4):805–17. doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181b799c1.
Friedman JH. A variable span scatterplot smoother. Laboratory for Computational Statistics, Stanford University Technical Report No. 5; 1984.
Greenblatt DJ, Sellers EM, Shader RI. Drug therapy: drug disposition in old age. N Engl J Med. 1982;306(18):1081–8. doi:10.1056/NEJM198205063061804.
Vuyk J. Pharmacodynamics in the elderly. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2003;17(2):207–18.
Kearns GL, Abdel-Rahman SM, Alander SW, Blowey DL, Leeder JS, Kauffman RE. Developmental pharmacology--drug disposition, action, and therapy in infants and children. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(12):1157–67. doi:10.1056/NEJMra035092.
Wilson K. Sex-related differences in drug disposition in man. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1984;9(3):189–202. doi:10.2165/00003088-198409030-00001.
Soldin OP, Chung SH, Mattison DR. Sex differences in drug disposition. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011;2011:187103. doi:10.1155/2011/187103.
Minto CF, Schnider TW, Egan TD, Youngs E, Lemmens HJ, Gambus PL, Billard V, Hoke JF, Moore KH, Hermann DJ, Muir KT, Mandema JW, Shafer SL. Influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. I. Model development. Anesthesiology. 1997;86(1):10–23.
Green B, Duffull SB. What is the best size descriptor to use for pharmacokinetic studies in the obese? Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;58(2):119–33. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02157.x.
Coetzee JF. Dose scaling for the morbidly obese. South Afr J Anaesth Analg. 2011;20(1):67–72.
Cortinez LI, De la Fuente N, Eleveld DJ, Oliveros A, Crovari F, Sepulveda P, Ibacache M, Solari S. Performance of propofol target-controlled infusion models in the obese: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis. Anesth Analg. 2014;119(2):302–10. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000000317.
Struys MM, De Smet T, Mortier EP. Simulated drug administration: an emerging tool for teaching clinical pharmacology during anesthesiology training. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008;84(1):170–4. doi:10.1038/clpt.2008.76.
Ducharme J, Varin F, Bevan DR, Donati F. Importance of early blood sampling on vecuronium pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1993;24(6):507–18. doi:10.2165/00003088-199324060-00006.
Schnider TW, Minto CF, Gambus PL, Andresen C, Goodale DB, Shafer SL, Youngs EJ. The influence of method of administration and covariates on the pharmacokinetics of propofol in adult volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1998;88(5):1170–82.
Murat I, Billard V, Vernois J, Zaouter M, Marsol P, Souron R, Farinotti R. Pharmacokinetics of propofol after a single dose in children aged 1-3 years with minor burns. Comparison of three data analysis approaches. Anesthesiology. 1996;84(3):526–32.
Saint-Maurice C, Cockshott ID, Douglas EJ, Richard MO, Harmey JL. Pharmacokinetics of propofol in young children after a single dose. Br J Anaesth. 1989;63(6):667–70.
Tuk B, Herben VM, Mandema JW, Danhof M. Relevance of arteriovenous concentration differences in pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of midazolam. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1998;284(1):202–7.
Stanski DR, Hudson RJ, Homer TD, Saidman LJ, Meathe E. Pharmacodynamic modeling of thiopental anesthesia. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1984;12(2):223–40.
Gepts E, Camu F, Cockshott ID, Douglas EJ. Disposition of propofol administered as constant rate intravenous infusions in humans. Anesth Analg. 1987;66(12):1256–63.
Miyabe-Nishiwaki T, Masui K, Kaneko A, Nishiwaki K, Nishio T, Kanazawa H. Evaluation of the predictive performance of a pharmacokinetic model for propofol in Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata fuscata). J Veterinary Pharmacol Ther. 2013;36(2):169–73. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2885.2012.01404.x.
Upton RN. The two-compartment recirculatory pharmacokinetic model--an introduction to recirculatory pharmacokinetic concepts. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92(4):475–84.
Kataria BK, Ved SA, Nicodemus HF, Hoy GR, Lea D, Dubois MY, Mandema JW, Shafer SL. The pharmacokinetics of propofol in children using three different data analysis approaches. Anesthesiology. 1994;80(1):104–22.
Fisher DM. Propofol in pediatrics. Lessons in pharmacokinetic modeling. Anesthesiology. 1994;80(1):2–5.
Ette EI, Williams PJ, Ahmad A. Population pharmacokinetic estimation methods. In: Ette EI, Williams PJ, editors. Pharmacometrics: the science of quantitative pharmacology. Hoboken: Wiley; 2007. p. 265–85.
Eleveld DJ, Proost JH, Cortinez LI, Absalom AR, Struys MM. A general purpose pharmacokinetic model for propofol. Anesth Analg. 2014;118(6):1221–37. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000000165.
Minto CF, Schnider TW, Gregg KM, Henthorn TK, Shafer SL. Using the time of maximum effect site concentration to combine pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Anesthesiology. 2003;99(2):324–33.
Thomson AJ, Nimmo AF, Engbers FH, Glen JB. A novel technique to determine an ‘apparent ke0’ value for use with the Marsh pharmacokinetic model for propofol. Anaesthesia. 2014;69(5):420–8. doi:10.1111/anae.12596.
Absalom AR, Mani V, De Smet T, Struys MM. Pharmacokinetic models for propofol--defining and illuminating the devil in the detail. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103(1):26–37. doi:10.1093/bja/aep143.
Schuttler J, Ihmsen H. Population pharmacokinetics of propofol: a multicenter study. Anesthesiology. 2000;92(3):727–38.
Upton RN, Ludbrook G. A physiologically based, recirculatory model of the kinetics and dynamics of propofol in man. Anesthesiology. 2005;103(2):344–52.
Tackley RM, Lewis GT, Prys-Roberts C, Boaden RW, Dixon J, Harvey JT. Computer controlled infusion of propofol. Br J Anaesth. 1989;62(1):46–53.
Avram MJ, Sanghvi R, Henthorn TK, Krejcie TC, Shanks CA, Fragen RJ, Howard KA, Kaczynski DA. Determinants of thiopental induction dose requirements [see comments]. Anesth Analg. 1993;76(1):10–7.
Avram MJ, Krejcie TC, Niemann CU, Klein C, Gentry WB, Shanks CA, Henthorn TK. The effect of halothane on the recirculatory pharmacokinetics of physiologic markers [see comments]. Anesthesiology. 1997;87(6):1381–93.
Absalom A, Kenny G. ‘Paedfusor’ pharmacokinetic data set. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95(1):110. doi:10.1093/bja/aei567.
Seo JH, Goo EK, Song IA, Park SH, Park HP, Jeon YT, Hwang JW. Influence of a modified propofol equilibration rate constant (k(e0)) on the effect-site concentration at loss and recovery of consciousness with the Marsh model. Anaesthesia. 2013;68(12):1232–8. doi:10.1111/anae.12419.
Cortinez LI, Anderson BJ, Penna A, Olivares L, Munoz HR, Holford NH, Struys MM, Sepulveda P. Influence of obesity on propofol pharmacokinetics: derivation of a pharmacokinetic model. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105(4):448–56. doi:10.1093/bja/aeq195.
van Kralingen S, Diepstraten J, Peeters MY, Deneer VH, van Ramshorst B, Wiezer RJ, van Dongen EP, Danhof M, Knibbe CA. Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol in morbidly obese patients. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2011;50(11):739–50. doi:10.2165/11592890-000000000-00000.
Research DMGoO, Waterlow JC, James WPT, Security GBDoHaS, Council MR. Research on obesity: a report of the DHSS/MRC group. London; 1976.
La Colla L, Albertin A, La Colla G, Porta A, Aldegheri G, Di Candia D, Gigli F. Predictive performance of the ‘Minto’ remifentanil pharmacokinetic parameter set in morbidly obese patients ensuing from a new method for calculating lean body mass. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2010;49(2):131–9. doi:10.2165/11317690-000000000-00000.
Janmahasatian S, Duffull SB, Ash S, Ward LC, Byrne NM, Green B. Quantification of lean bodyweight. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2005;44(10):1051–65. doi:10.2165/00003088-200544100-00004.
La Colla L, Albertin A, La Colla G. Pharmacokinetic model-driven remifentanil administration in the morbidly obese: the ‘critical weight’ and the ‘fictitious height’, a possible solution to an unsolved problem? Clin Pharmacokinet. 2009;48(6):397–8. doi:10.2165/00003088-200948060-00005.
Shafer SL, Gregg KM. Algorithms to rapidly achieve and maintain stable drug concentrations at the site of drug effect with a computer-controlled infusion pump. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1992;20(2):147–69.
Struys MM, Coppens MJ, De Neve N, Mortier EP, Doufas AG, Van Bocxlaer JF, Shafer SL. Influence of administration rate on propofol plasma-effect site equilibration. Anesthesiology. 2007;107(3):386–96.
Engbers F. Basic pharmacokinetic principles for intravenous anaesthesia. In: Vuyk J, Schraag S, editors. Advances in modelling and clinical application of intravenous anaesthesia. New York: Springer; 2003.
Masui K. http://www.masuinet.com.
Lim TA. A novel method of deriving the effect compartment equilibrium rate constant for propofol. Br J Anaesth. 2003;91(5):730–2.
Schnider T, Minto C. Pharmacokinetic models of propofol for TCI. Anaesthesia. 2008;63(2):206. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05419_1.x. author reply 206–207.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Masui, K. (2017). How to Select a PK/PD Model. In: Absalom, A., Mason, K. (eds) Total Intravenous Anesthesia and Target Controlled Infusions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47609-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47609-4_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47607-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47609-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)