Abstract
Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) is one of the options used to analyze mediation effects. Over the past few years, the methods for testing mediation have become more sophisticated. However, many researchers continue to use outdated methods to test mediation effects in PLS-SEM, which can lead to erroneous results in some cases. One reason for the use of outdated methods is that PLS-SEM tutorials do not draw on the newest statistical findings. This chapter illustrates how to perform modern procedures in PLS-SEM by challenging the conventional approach to mediation analysis and providing better alternatives.
These novel methods offer a wide range of testing options (e.g., multiple mediators) that go beyond simple mediation analysis alternatives, helping researchers to discuss their studies in a more accurate way. This chapter seeks to illustrate and help to operationalize the mediation in Nitzl et al.’s (Indus Manag Data Syst 116:1849–1864, 2016) paper about mediation in PLS, published in Industrial Management & Data Systems, with examples of two potential mediations: a multiple mediation with two mediators and a multistep multiple mediation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aguinis, H., Edwards, J. R., & Bradley, K. J. (2017). Improving our understanding of moderation and mediation in strategic management research. Organizational Research Methods (forthcoming).
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
Cegarra, J. G., & Sánchez, M. T. (2008). Linking the individual forgetting context with customer capital from a seller’s perspective. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59, 1614–1623.
Chernick, M. R. (2011). Bootstrap methods: A guide for practitioners and researchers. New York: Wiley.
Cheung, G. W., & Lau, R. S. (2008). Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables: Bootstrapping with structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 296–325.
Chin, W. W., Kim, Y. J., & Lee, G. (2013). Testing the differential impact of structural paths in PLS analysis: A bootstrapping approach. In H. Abdi et al. (Eds.), New perspectives in partial least squares and related methods, Springer proceedings in mathematics and statistics (Vol. 56, pp. 221–229). New York: Springer.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408–420.
Hayes, A. F., & Scharkow, M. (2013). The relative trustworthiness of inferential test of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: Does method rally matter? Psychological Science, 24(10), 1918–1927.
Henseler, J. (2017). Bridging design and behavioral research with variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 178–192.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In R. R. Sinkovics & P. N. Ghauri (Eds.), Advances in International Marketing (Vol. 20, pp. 277–320). Bingley: Emerald.
Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20.
Iacobucci, D., Saldanha, N., & Deng, X. (2007). A mediation on mediation: Evidence that structural equation models perform better than regression. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 140–154.
Jansen, J. J. P., George, G., van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2008). Senior team attributes and organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of transformational leadership. Journal of Management Studies, 45(5), 982–1007.
Jones, E., Sundaram, S., & Chin, W. W. (2002). Factors leading to sales force automation use: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 22, 145–156.
Lau, R. S., & Cheung, G. W. (2012). Estimating and comparing specific mediation effects in complex latent variable models. Organizational Research Methods, 15(1), 3–16.
Lu, Y., & Ramamurthy, K. (2011). Understanding the link between information technology capability and organizational agility: An empirical examination. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 931–954.
MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593–614.
Mathieu, J. E., DeShon, R. P., & Bergh, D. D. (2008). Mediational inferences in organizational research: Then, now, and beyond. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 203–223.
Nitzl, C., Roldan, J. L., & Cepeda-Carrion, G. (2016). Mediation analysis in partial least squares path modeling: Helping researchers discuss more sophisticated models. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(9), 1849–1864.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.
Quinn, R. E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science, 29(3), 363–377.
Rigdon, E. (2016). Choosing PLS path modeling as analytical method in European Management Research: A realist perspective. European Management Journal, 34(6), 598–605.
Rodríguez-Entrena, M., Schuberth, F., & Gelhard, C. (2016). Assessing statistical differences between parameters estimates in Partial Least Squares path modeling. Quality and Quantity, 1–13.
Roldán, J. L., Cegarra, J. G., & Cepeda, G. (2014). Building organisational agility through an unlearning Context. European Conference on Knowledge Management, 2, 834–842.
Roldán, J. L., Sanchez-Franco, M. J., & Real, J. C. (2017). From frequency of use to social integration: The mediation of routinization and infusion in Tuenti community. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 23(2), 63–69.
Rucker, D. D., Preacher, K. J., Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(6), 359–371.
Shmueli, G., Ray, S., Estrada, J. M. V., & Chatla, S. B. (2016). The elephant in the room: Evaluating the predictive performance of PLS models. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4552–4564.
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and non-experimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422–445.
Sundaram, S., Schwarz, A., Jones, E., & Chin, W. W. (2007). Technology use on the front line: How technology enhances individual performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35, 101–112.
Williams, J., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Resampling and distribution of the product methods for testing indirect effects in complex models. Structural Equation Modeling, 15(1), 23–52.
Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. doi:10.1086/651257.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carrión, G.C., Nitzl, C., Roldán, J.L. (2017). Mediation Analyses in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Guidelines and Empirical Examples. In: Latan, H., Noonan, R. (eds) Partial Least Squares Path Modeling. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64069-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64069-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64068-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64069-3
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)