Abstract
We evaluate healthcare system efficiency of 34 Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) member countries using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Our implementations rely on data for the years 2008 and 2012. Our base model is an output oriented Banker-Charnes-Cooper model that uses the number of physicians, nurses, beds per 1000 population as inputs, and life expectancy at birth, infant survival rate as outputs. We observe that the distinction between efficient/inefficient countries is not necessarily in line with the classification of developed/developing countries, which is consistent with findings in past studies. We then build Assurance Region Global (ARG) versions of our base model in order to impose restrictions on weights assigned to outputs, thus limiting DEA’s inherent ability to interpret a decision making unit’s performance from a most optimistic point of view for that particular unit. We observe that some developing countries remain efficient in these models as well. Analysis of the results of our ARG model with 2008 data shows that Luxembourg appears as a reference for inefficient countries most frequently whereas Sweden, Chile and Spain appear in the reference list multiple times. In the 2012 ARG model, Slovenia appears most often as a reference followed up by Iceland and Spain. We then analyze efficiency with respect to the alternative output of survival from most likely causes of death such as ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular diseases and malignant neoplasms (cancer) on 2008 and 2012 data. France is the model country for most of the inefficient countries with the new output variables. While there are some differences between the efficient countries of the base model and the modified one, the overlap is quite strong.
Notes
- 1.
A total of 14 data items, 8 for 2008, 6 for 2012 of the total 340 have been estimated.
- 2.
The distinction between developing and developed economies is made based on the classification of the UN (2015) World Economic Situation and Prospect report.
- 3.
Weight are rounded to two digit accuracy and the total may deviate from 1.00 for some countries.
References
Afonso A, Aubyn MS (2005) Non-parametric approaches to education and health efficiency in OECD countries. J Appl Econ 8(2):227–246
Borisov D, Cicea C, Turlea C (2012) DEA model for assessing efficiency in providing health care and management decisions. Manage Res Pract 4(1):5–18
Capell K (2008) The french lesson in health care. The Guardian, 26 June 2008. http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/jun/26/climatechange.scienceofclimatechange
Charnes A, Cooper WW, Huang ZM (1990) Polyhedral cone-ratio DEA models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks. J Econometrics 46(1–2):73–91
Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (2006) Introduction to data envelopment analysis and its uses with DEA-solver software and references, Springer, Berlin
De Looper M, Lafortune G (2009) Measuring disparities in health status and in access and use of health care in OECD countries. Organisation for Economics Co-operation and Development
Frogner BK, Frech H, Parente ST (2015) Comparing efficiency of health systems across industrialized countries: a panel analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 15(1):1
Galterio L, Helton J, Langabeer J, 2nd, DelliFraine J (2009) Data envelopment analysis: performance normalization and benchmarking in healthcare. J Health Inf Manag 23(3):38–43
Greene W (2004) Distinguishing between heterogeneity and inefficiency: stochastic frontier analysis of the world health organization’s panel data on national health care systems. Health Econ 13(10):959–980
Jacobs R (2001) Alternative methods to examine hospital efficiency: data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier analysis. Health Care Manage Sci 4:103–115
Johnes J (2006) Data envelopment analysis and its application to the measurement of efficiency in higher education. Econ Educ Rev 25(3):273–288
Joro T, Korhonen P, Wallenius J (1998) Structural comparison of data envelopment analysis and multiple objective linear programming. Manage Sci 44(7):962–970
Kazandjian VA, Lied T (1999) Healthcare performance measurement: systems design and evaluation. ASQ Quality Press, Wisconsin
Liu JS, Lu LY, Lu WM, Lin BJ (2013) A survey of dea applications. Omega 41(5):893–902
Malmquist S (1953) Index numbers and indifference surfaces. Trabajos de Estadistica y de Investigacion Operativa 4(2):209–242
Mohan R, Mirmirani S (2007) An assessment of OECD health care system using panel data analysis. Southwest Bus Econ J 16:21–35
OECD (2013) Health at a glance 2013: OECD indicators. OECD
OECD (2016) Secretary-general’s report to ministers 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/sg_report-2016-en
Özcan YA (2008) Health care benchmarking and performance evaluation: an assessment using data envelopment analysis. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, vol 120. Springer, Berlin
Reinhardt UE, Hussey PS, Anderson GF (2002) Cross-national comparisons of health systems using OECD data, 1999. Health Affair 21(3):169–181
Retzlaff-Roberts D, Chang FC, Rubin RM (2004) Technical efficiency in the use of health care resources: a comparison of OECD countries. Health Policy 69:55–72
Samut PK, Cafrı R (2015) Analysis of the efficiency determinants of health systems in OECD countries by DEA and panel Tobit. In: Social indicators research. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–20
Tandon A, Murray CJ, Lauer JA, Evans DB (2001) Measuring overall health system performance for 191 countries. World Health Organization
The Guardian (2003) NHS slips down world healthcare league. The Guardian-Society, 14 November 2003. http://www.theguardian.com/society/2003/nov/14/politics.medicineandhealth
The New York Times (2007) World’s best medical care? The New York Times, 12 August 2007. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/12/opinion/12sun1.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Thompson RG, Singleton FDJ, Thrall RM, Smith BA (1986) Comparative site evaluations for locating a high-energy physics lab in Texas. Interfaces 16:35–49
UN (2015) World economic situation and prospects statistical annex 2015. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/policy/wesp/wesp_archive/2015wespstats-en.pdf
Varabyova Y, Schreyögg J (2013) International comparisons of the technical efficiency of the hospital sector: panel data analysis of OECD countries using parametric and non-parametric approaches. Health Policy 112(1):70–79
Wang R, Yu M (2006) Evaluating the efficiency of hospital’s departments using DEA. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on service operations and logistics, and informatics (SOLI 2006), pp 1167–1170
WHO (2000) World health organization (2000) the world health report 2000: health systems: improving performance. http://www.who.int/whr/2000/en/
WHO (2014) The top 10 causes of death. Fact sheet no 310, May 2014. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs310/en/
WHO (2015) World Health Organization (2015) world health statistics 2015. http://www.who.int/gho/publications/world_health_statistics/2015/en/
Wong YHB, Beasley JE (1990) Restricting weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis. J Oper Res Soc 41(9):829–835
Zhou P, Ang BW, Poh KL (2008) A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies. Eur J Oper Res 189(1):1–18
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Önen, Z., Sayın, S. (2018). Evaluating Healthcare System Efficiency of OECD Countries: A DEA-Based Study. In: Kahraman, C., Topcu, Y. (eds) Operations Research Applications in Health Care Management. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 262. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65455-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65455-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65453-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65455-3
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)