Skip to main content

Reporting and Learning Systems for Patient Safety

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Organizational Context of Nursing Practice

Abstract

Safety in healthcare is arguably a constantly moving target. The field of patient safety has expanded and as a result, more types of harm are now preventable. Healthcare providers need to be able to achieve ever-evolving targets dealing with a seemingly infinite variability of safety issues. Therefore, they need to analyze situations and take appropriate actions that fit specific contexts and settings. Two systems related to learning systems for patient safety are highlighted in this chapter. Firstly, we examine registration, reporting, and learning systems for patient safety incidents and examine insights from the literature and practice regarding how reporting systems should be constructed. The various requirements of a learning system are discussed, including shifting from a centralized approach, where experts serve as intermediaries, to a decentralized unit-based approach, as well as a shift from recording/data gathering to learning. Subsequently, we discuss our experiences in organizing an incident learning system—including examples of successes and barriers we encountered in implementing a system based on findings from the literature translated to the context of the Antwerp University Hospital. Secondly, we discuss an approach for developing a learning culture using an internationally recognized nurse-sensitive patient outcomes benchmarking dataset embedded in a professional practice model to align quality and patient safety improvement efforts across all levels of our hospital. The second strategy was part of our journey to nursing excellence as we worked toward Magnet hospital designation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AHRQ. CUSP toolkit. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JE, Kodate N. Learning from patient safety incidents in incident review meetings: organisational factors and indicators of analytic process effectiveness. Saf Sci. 2015;80:105–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benn J, et al. Feedback from incident reporting: information and action to improve patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18:11–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brubakk K, et al. A systematic review of hospital accreditation: the challenges of measuring complex intervention effects. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:280.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Patient Safety Institute. Reporting and learning systems. 2017. http://www.patientsafetyinstitute.ca/en/toolsResources/PatientSafetyIncidentManagementToolkit/PatientSafetyManagement/pages/reporting-and-learning-systems.aspx#

  • Clarke SP, Donaldson NE. Nurse staffing and patient care quality and safety. In: Hughes RG, editor. Patient safety and quality: an evidence-based handbook for nurses. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danish Society for Patient Safety. Optimisation of the Danish incident reporting system. 2016. https://patientsikkerhed.dk/content/uploads/2016/09/optimisationofthedanishincidentreportingsystem.pdf

  • Drach-Zahavy A, et al. How do we learn from errors? A prospective study of the link between the ward’s learning practices and medication administration errors. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014;51:448–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drupsteen L, Guldenmund FW. What is learning? A review of the safety literature to define learning from incidents, accidents and disasters: a review about learning from incidents, accidents and disasters. J Contingencies Crisis Man. 2014;22:81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drupsteen L, Hasle P. Why do organizations not learn from incidents? Bottlenecks, causes and conditions for a failure to effectively learn. Accid Anal Prev. 2014;72:351–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drupsteen L, Groeneweg J, Zwetsloot GI. Critical steps in learning from incidents: using learning potential in the process from reporting an incident to accident prevention. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2013;19:63–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. Key findings and recommendations on reporting and learning systems for patient safety incidents across Europe. Brussels: European Commission, Patient Safety and Quality of Care Working Group; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans SM, et al. Attitudes and barriers to incident reporting: a collaborative hospital study. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15:39–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Forward Programme. World alliance for patient safety. 2006–2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez JF, et al. Impact of magnet culture in maintaining quality outcomes during periods of organizational transition. J Nurs Care Qual. 2015;30:323–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt TA, Chreim S. Fix and forget or fix and report: a qualitative study of tensions at the front line of incident reporting. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24:303–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Howell AM, et al. International recommendations for national patient safety incident reporting systems: an expert Delphi consensus-building process. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017a;26:150–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howell AM, et al. Incident reporting: rare incidents may benefit from national problem solving. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017b;26:517.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CW. How will we get the data and what will we do with it then? Issues in the reporting of adverse healthcare events. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12(Suppl 2):ii64–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan HS, Fastman BR. Organization of event reporting data for sense making and system improvement. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12(Suppl 2):ii68–72.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Key findings and recommendations on Reporting and learning systems for patient safety incidents across Europe. 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leistikow I, et al. Learning from incidents in healthcare: the journey, not the arrival, matters. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26:252–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis L. Magnet supporting patient safety. J Nurs Adm. 2014;44:S1–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luquire R, Strong M. Empirical outcomes. In: Drenkard K, Wolf GA, Morgan SH, editors. Magnet : the next generation : nurses making the difference. Silver Spring: American Nurses Credentialing Center; 2011. p. 194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macrae C. The problem with incident reporting. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25:71–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller K, et al. Using the comprehensive unit-based safety program model for sustained reduction in hospital infections. Am J Infect Control. 2016;44:969–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell I, et al. Patient safety incident reporting: a qualitative study of thoughts and perceptions of experts 15 years after ‘To Err is Human’. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25:92–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moeller AD, Rasmussen K, Nielsen KJ. Learning and feedback from the Danish patient safety incident reporting system can be improved. Dan Med J. 2016;63:A5242.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ontario HQ. Patient safety learning systems: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2017;17(3):1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Optimisation of the Danish incident reporting system. 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pham JC, Girard T, Pronovost PJ. What to do with healthcare incident reporting systems. J Publ Health Res. 2013;2:e27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polisena J, et al. Factors that influence the recognition, reporting and resolution of incidents related to medical devices and other healthcare technologies: a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2015;4:37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pronovost PJ, et al. Fifteen years after To Err is Human: a success story to learn from. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25:396–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rabøl LI, Gaardboe O, Hellebek A. Incident reporting must result in local action. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26:515–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reporting Patient Safety Events. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samson D, et al. Current status of JACIE accreditation in Europe: a special report from the Joint Accreditation Committee of the ISCT and the EBMT (JACIE). Bone Marrow Transplant. 2007;39:133–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sari AB, et al. Sensitivity of routine system for reporting patient safety incidents in an NHS hospital: retrospective patient case note review. BMJ. 2007;334:79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shojania KG. The frustrating case of incident-reporting systems. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17:400–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stelfox HT, et al. The “To Err is Human” report and the patient safety literature. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15:174–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas EJ, Petersen LA. Measuring errors and adverse events in health care. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:61–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Usher K, et al. Self-reported confidence in patient safety knowledge among Australian undergraduate nursing students: a multi-site cross-sectional survey study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2017;71:89–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Bogaert P, et al. Nursing unit teams matter: Impact of unit-level nurse practice environment, nurse work characteristics, and burnout on nurse reported job outcomes, and quality of care, and patient adverse events–a cross-sectional survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014;51:1123–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Veiligheidsprogramma VMS. Praktijkgids Veilig Incidenten Melden. 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent C, Amalberti R. Safety in healthcare is a moving target. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24:539–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vrbnjak D, et al. Barriers to reporting medication errors and near misses among nurses: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;63:162–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner C, et al. Unit-based incident reporting and root cause analysis: variation at three hospital unit types. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e011277.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wick EC, et al. Implementation of a surgical comprehensive unit-based safety program to reduce surgical site infections. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215:193–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams H, Cooper A, Carson-Stevens A. Opportunities for incident reporting. Response to: ‘the problem with incident reporting’ by Macrae et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25:133–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. Forward programme 2006–2007. Washington, DC: World Alliance for Patient Safety; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo MS, Kim KJ. Exploring the influence of nurse work environment and patient safety culture on attitudes toward incident reporting. J Nurs Adm. 2017;47:434–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danny Van heusden .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Van heusden, D., Van Bogaert, P. (2018). Reporting and Learning Systems for Patient Safety. In: Van Bogaert, P., Clarke, S. (eds) The Organizational Context of Nursing Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71042-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71042-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71041-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71042-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics