Skip to main content

An Archetype-Based Solution for the Interoperability of Computerised Guidelines and Electronic Health Records

  • Conference paper
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIME 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6747))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Clinical guidelines contain recommendations based on the best empirical evidence available at the moment. There is a wide consensus about the benefits of guidelines and about the fact that they should be deployed through clinical information systems, making them available during consultation time. However, one of the main obstacles to this integration is still the interaction with the electronic health record. In this paper we present an archetype-based approach to solve the interoperability problems of guideline systems, as well as to enable guideline sharing. We also describe the knowledge requirements for the development of archetype-enabled guideline systems, and then focus on the development of appropriate guideline archetypes and on the connection of these archetypes to the target electronic health record.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Sonnenberg, F., Hagerty, C.: Computer-Interpretable Clinical Practice Guidelines. Where Are We and where Are We Going? IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 145–158 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Peleg, M., Miksch, S., Seyfang, A., Bury, J., Ciccarese, P., Fox, J., Greenes, R., Hall, R., Johnson, P., Jones, N., Kumar, A., Quaglini, S., Shortliffe, E., Stefanelli, M.: Comparing computer-interpretable guideline models: A case-study approach. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assn. 10, 52–68 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. de Clercq, P.A., Blom, J.A., Korsten, H.H.M., Hasman, A.: Approaches for creating computer-interpretable guidelines that facilitate decision support. Artif. Intell. Med. 31, 1–27 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Panzarasa, S., Quaglini, S., Cavallini, A., Micieli, G., Marcheselli, S., Stefanelli, M.: Technical Solutions for Integrating Clinical Practice Guidelines with Electronic Patient Records. In: Riaño, D., ten Teije, A., Miksch, S., Peleg, M. (eds.) KR4HC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5943, pp. 141–154. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, R., Georgii-Hemming, P., Åhlfeldt, H.: Representing a Chemotherapy Guideline Using openEHR and Rules. In: Proc. of the 22nd Int. Conf. of the European Federation for Medical Informatics (MIE 2009), pp. 653–657. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beale, T., Heard, S.: Architecture Overview (April 2007), http://www.openehr.org/releases/1.0.2/architecture/overview.pdf

  7. Marcos, M., Martínez-Salvador, B.: Towards the Interoperability of Computerised Guidelines and Electronic Health Records: An Experiment with openEHR Archetypes and a Chronic Heart Failure Guideline. In: Riaño, D., ten Teije, A., Miksch, S., Peleg, M. (eds.) KR4HC 2010. LNCS, vol. 6512, pp. 101–113. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Angulo, C., Crespo, P., Maldonado, J.A., Moner, D., Pérez, D., Abad, I., Mandingorra, J., Robles, M.: Non-invasive lightweight integration engine for building EHR from autonomous distributed systems. Int. J. of Med. Inform. 76(S3), 417–424 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hripcsak, G., Ludemann, P., Pryor, T.A., Wigertz, O.B., Clayton, P.D.: Rationale for the Arden Syntax. Comput. Biomed. Res. 27, 291–324 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Peleg, M., Keren, S., Denekamp, Y.: Mapping computerized clinical guidelines to electronic medical records: Knowledge-data ontological mapper (KDOM). J. Biomed. Inform. 41(1), 180–201 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. German, E., Leibowitz, A., Shahar, Y.: An architecture for linking medical decision-support applications to clinical databases and its evaluation. J. Biomed. Inform. 42(2), 203–218 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure of the ESC: Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure: executive summary (update 2005). Eur. Heart J. 26, 1115–1140 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Maldonado, J., Moner, D., Boscá, D., Fernández, J., Angulo, C., Robles, M.: LinkEHR-Ed: A multi-reference model archetype editor based on formal semantics. Int. J. of Med. Inform. 78(8), 559–570 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Marcos, M., Maldonado, J.A., Martínez-Salvador, B., Moner, D., Boscá, D., Robles, M. (2011). An Archetype-Based Solution for the Interoperability of Computerised Guidelines and Electronic Health Records. In: Peleg, M., Lavrač, N., Combi, C. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. AIME 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6747. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22218-4_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22218-4_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22217-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22218-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics