Skip to main content

Coronary Artery Interventions in Cardiogenic Shock

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
PanVascular Medicine

Abstract

Although improved from the historically high mortality of 80–90 %, the current prognosis of patients with cardiogenic shock remains dismal. Because of the difficulty conducting randomized studies in patients with cardiogenic shock, there is relatively little data to guide management of these patients. Much of the data discussed below is observational with one notable exception being the SHOCK (Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock) trial that demonstrated the importance of early mechanical revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Much of the recent effort to advance the field has centered upon mechanical circulatory support, which represents the next major frontier in improving outcomes for this cohort of patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

Cardiac tamponade:

Acute type of pericardial effusion due to fluid, pus or blood, clots accumulation within the pericardial cavity associated hypotension, elevated jugular venous pressure, paradoxical pulse and distant heart sounds. Echocardiographic diagnostic criteria include right atrial systolic collapse, right ventricular diastolic collapse, reciprocal respiratory ventricular inflow, inferior vena cava congestions.

Cardiogenic shock (CS):

Is a state of circulatory collaps with end-organ hypoperfusion due to cardiac failure. The definition of CS is based on hemodynamic parameters including persistent hypotension (systolic blood pressure <80 to 90 mm Hg or mean arterial pressure 30 mm Hg lower than baseline) with severe reduction in cardiac index (<1.8 L · min−1 · m−2 without support or <2.0 to 2.2 L · min−1 · m−2 with support) and adequate or elevated filling pressure (eg., left ventricular [LV] end-diastolic pressure >18 mm Hg or right ventricular [RV] end-diastolic pressure >10 to 15 mm Hg).

Inotropes (Inotropic agents):

Agent capable to increase the force of myocardial contaction.

Paradoxical pulse:

Is a decrease in systolic blood pressure (>10mmHg) and pulse wave amplitude during inspiration.

AMI:

Acute myocardial infarction

BiVAD:

Biventricular assist device

CABG:

Coronary artery bypass grafting

CS:

Cardiogenic shock

ECMO:

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

GUSTO-1:

Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries study

IABP:

Intra-aortic balloon pump

LVAD:

Left ventricular assist device

MCS:

Mechanical circulatory support

NO:

Nitric oxide

NSTEMI:

Non ST-elevation myocardial infarction

PCI:

Percutaneous coronary intervention

SHOCK:

Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock trial and registry

STEMI:

ST-elevation myocardial infarction

SVR:

Systemic vascular resistance

References

  • Akiyama K, Kimura A, Suzuki H, Takeyama Y, Gluckman TL, Terhakopian A, Katagiri T, Suh KY, Roseto J, Bing RJ (1998) Production of oxidative products of nitric oxide in infarcted human heart. J Am Coll Cardiol 32:373–379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson RD, Ohman EM, Holmes DR Jr, Col I, Stebbins AL, Bates ER, Stomel RJ, Granger CB, Topol EJ, Califf RM (1997) Use of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in patients presenting with cardiogenic shock: observations from the GUSTO-I Study. Global utilization of streptokinase and TPA for occluded coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 30:708

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Apex AMII (2007) Pexelizumab for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction in patients under- going primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 297:43–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asaumi Y, Yasuda S, Morii I, Kakuchi H, Otsuka Y, Kawamura A, Sasako Y, Nakatani T, Nonogi H, Miyazaki S (2005) Favourable clinical outcome in patients with cardiogenic shock due to fulminant myocarditis supported by percutaneous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Eur Heart J 26:2185–2192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Assenza GE, McElhinney DB, Valente AM, Pearson DD, Volpe M, Martucci G, Landzberg MJ, Lock JE (2013) Transcatheter closure of post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 6:59–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo CF, Amado LC, Kraitchman DL, Gerber BL, Edvardsen T, Osman NF, Rochitte CE, Wu KC, Lima JA (2005) The effect of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation on left ventricular functional recovery early after acute myocardial infarction: a randomized experimental magnetic resonance imaging study. Eur Heart J 26:1235–1241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Babaev A, Frederick PD, Pasta DJ, Every N, Sichrovsky T, Hochman JS, Investigators NRMI (2005) Trends in management and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. JAMA 294:448

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barron HV, Every NR, Parsons LS, Angeja B, Goldberg RJ, Gore JM, Chou TM, Investigators in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 (2001) The use of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2. Am Heart J 141:933

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer T, Zeymer U, Hochadel M, Möllmann H, Weidinger F, Zahn R, Nef HM, Hamm CW, Marco J, Gitt AK (2012) Use and outcomes of multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (from the EHS-PCI registry). Am J Cardiol 109:941–946

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Becker RC, Gore JM, Lambrew C, Weaver WD, Rubison RM, French WJ, Tiefenbrunn AJ, Bowlby LJ, Rogers WJ (1996) A composite view of cardiac rupture in the United States National Registry of Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 27:1321–1326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard SA, Gray TW, Buist MD, Jones BM, Silvester W, Gutteridge G, Smith K (2002) Treatment of comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with induced hypothermia. N Engl J Med 346:557–563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernat I, Abdelaal E, Plourde G, Bataille Y, Cech J, Pesek J, Koza J, Jirous S, Machaalany J, Déry JP, Costerousse O, Rokyta R, Bertrand OF (2013) Early and late outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention by radial or femoral approach in patients presenting in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. Am Heart J 165:338–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonello L, De Labriolle A, Roy P, Steinberg DH, Pinto Slottow TL, Xue Z, Smith K, Torguson R, Suddath WO, Satler LF, Kent KM, Pichard AD, Waksman R (2008) Bivalirudin with provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients undergoing primary angioplasty in the setting of cardiogenic shock. Am J Cardiol 102:287–291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle AJ, Ascheim DD, Russo MJ, Kormos RL, John R, Naka Y, Gelijns AC, Hong KN, Teuteberg JJ (2011) Clinical outcomes for continuous-flow left ventricular assist device patients stratified by preoperative INTERMACS classification. J Heart Lung Transplant 30:402–407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brodie BR, Stuckey TD, Hansen C, Muncy D (1999) Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation before primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty reduces catheterization laboratory events in high-risk patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 84(1):18–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burkhoff D, Cohen H, Brunckhorst C, O’Neill WW, TandemHeart Investigators Group (2006) A randomized multicenter clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device versus conventional therapy with intraaortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock. Am Heart J 152:469.e1–469.e8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavender MA, Milford-Beland S, Roe MT, Peterson ED, Weintraub WS, Rao SV (2009) Prevalence, predictors, and in-hospital outcomes of non-infarct artery intervention during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry). Am J Cardiol 104:507–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chan AW, Chew DP, Bhatt DL, Moliterno DJ, Topol EJ, Ellis SG (2002) Long-term mortality benefit with the combination of stents and abciximab for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 89:132–136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen JM, DeRose JJ, Slater JP, Spanier TB, Dewey TM, Catanese KA, Flannery MA, Oz MC (1999) Improved survival rates support left ventricular assist device implantation early after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 33:1903–1908

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Q, Darlymple-Hay MJ, Alexiou C, Ohri SK, Haw MP, Livesey SA, Monro JL (2002) Mitral valve surgery for acute papillary muscle rupture following myocardial infarction. J Heart Valve Dis 11:27–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cotter G, Kaluski E, Milo O, Blatt A, Salah A, Hendler A, Krakover R, Golick A, Vered Z (2003) LINCS: l-NAME (a NO synthase inhibitor) in the treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock: a prospective randomized study. Eur Heart J 24:1287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dang NC, Topkara VK, Leacche M, John R, Byrne JG, Naka Y (2005) Left ventricular assist device implantation after acute anterior wall myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: a two-center study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 130:693–698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Backer D, Biston P, Devriendt J, Madl C, Chochrad D, Aldecoa C, Brasseur A, Defrance P, Gottignies P, Vincent JL, Investigators SOAPII (2010) Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock. N Engl J Med 362:779

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Depré C, Vanoverschelde JL, Goudemant JF, Mottet I, Hue L (1995) Protection against ischemic injury by nonvasoactive concentrations of nitric oxide synthase inhibitors in the perfused rabbit heart. Circulation 92:1911–1918

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Desai NR, Bhatt DL (2009) Evaluating percutaneous support for cardiogenic shock: data shock and sticker shock. Eur Heart J 30:2073–2075

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon SR, Henriques JP, Mauri L, Sjauw K, Civitello A, Kar B, Loyalka P, Resnic FS, Teirstein P, Makkar R, Palacios IF, Collins M, Moses J, Benali K, O’Neill WW (2009) A prospective feasibility trial investigating the use of the Impella 2.5 system in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (The PROTECT I Trial): initial U.S. experience. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2:91–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dzavik V, Sleeper LA, Cocke TP, Moscucci M, Saucedo J, Hosat S, Jiang X, Slater J, LeJemtel T, Hochman JS, Investigators SHOCK (2003) Early revascularization is associated with improved survival in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. Eur Heart J 24:828

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eagle KA, Goodman SG, Avezum A, Budaj A, Sullivan CM, López-Sendón J, Investigators GRACE (2002) Practice variation and missed opportunities for reperfusion in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Lancet 359:373–377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engström AE, Cocchieri R, Driessen AH, Sjauw KD, Vis MM, Baan J, de Jong M, Lagrand WK, van der Sloot JA, Tijssen JG, de Winter RJ, de Mol BA, Piek JJ, Henriques JP (2011) The Impella 2.5 and 5.0 devices for ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients presenting with severe and profound cardiogenic shock: the Academic Medical Center intensive care unit experience. Crit Care Med 39:2072e9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng Q, Lu X, Jones DL, Shen J, Arnold JM (2001) Increased inducible nitric oxide synthase expression contributes to myocardial dysfunction and higher mortality after myocardial infarction in mice. Circulation 104:700–704

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson JJ, Cohen M, Freedman RJ, Stone GW, Miller MF, Joseph DL, Ohman EM (2001) The current practice of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation: results from the Benchmark Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 38:1456–1462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fibrinolytic Therapy Trialists’ (FTT) Collaborative Group (1994) Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction: collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomised trials of more than 1000 patients. Lancet 343:311–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Fincke R, Hochman JS, Lowe AM, Menon V, Slater JN, Webb JG, LeJemtel TH, Cotter G, SHOCK Investigators (2004) Cardiac power is the strongest hemodynamic correlate of mortality in cardiogenic shock: a report from the SHOCK trial registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 44:340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • French JK, Feldman HA, Assmann SF, Sanborn T, Palmeri ST, Miller D, Boland J, Buller CE, Steingart R, Sleeper LA, Hochman JS, Investigators SHOCK (2003) Influence of thrombolytic therapy, with or without intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation, on 12-month survival in the SHOCK trial. Am Heart J 146:804–810

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg RJ, Gore JM, Alpert JS, Osganian V, de Groot J, Bade J, Chen Z, Frid D, Dalen JE (1991) Cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. Incidence and mortality from a community-wide perspective, 1975 to 1988. N Engl J Med 325:1117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg RJ, Spencer FA, Gore JM, Lessard D, Yarzebski J (2009) Thirty-year trends (1975 to 2005) in the magnitude of, management of, and hospital death rates associated with cardiogenic shock in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a population-based perspective. Circulation 119:1211

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory SD, Timms D, Gaddum N, Mason DG, Fraser JF (2011) Biventricular assist devices: a technical review. Ann Biomed Eng 39:2313–2328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith BP, Anderson MB, Samuels LE, Pae WE Jr, Naka Y, Frazier OH (2013) The RECOVER I: a multicenter prospective study of Impella 5.0/LD for postcardiotomy circulatory support. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 145:548–554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gurbel PA, Anderson RD, MacCord CS, Scott H, Komjathy SF, Poulton J, Stafford JL, Godard J (1994) Arterial diastolic pressure augmentation by intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation enhances the onset of coronary artery reperfusion by thrombolytic therapy. Circulation 89:361–365

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hasdai D, Harrington RA, Hochman JS, Califf RM, Battler A, Box JW, Simoons ML, Deckers J, Topol EJ, Holmes DR Jr (2000) Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade and outcome of cardiogenic shock complicating acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation. J Am Coll Cardiol 36:685–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hasdai D, Holmes DR Jr, Califf RM, Thompson TD, Hochman JS, Pfisterer M, Topol EJ (1999) Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: predictors of death. GUSTO investigators. Global utilization of streptokinase and tissue-plasminogen activator for occluded coronary arteries. Am Heart J 138:21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hochman JS (2003) Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: expanding the paradigm. Circulation 107:2998

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, Sanborn TA, White HD, Talley JD, Buller CE, Jacobs AK, Slater JN, Col J, McKinlay SM, LeJemtel TH (1999) Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 341:625

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hochman JS, Buller CE, Sleeper LA, Boland J, Dzavik V, Sanborn TA, Godfrey E, White HD, Lim J, LeJemtel T (2000) Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction–etiologies, management and outcome: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK? J Am Coll Cardiol 36:1063

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, White HD, Dzavik V, Wong SC, Menon V, Webb JG, Steingart R, Picard MH, Menegus MA, Boland J, Sanborn T, Buller CE, Modur S, Forman R, Desvigne-Nickens P, Jacobs AK, Slater JN, LeJemtel TH, SHOCK Investigators (2001) Should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for cardiogenic shock. One-year survival following early revascularization for cardiogenic shock. JAMA 285:190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, Dzavik V, Buller CE, Aylward P, Col J, White HD, Investigators SHOCK (2006) Early revascularization and long-term survival in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. JAMA 295:2511

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes DR Jr, Berger PB, Hochman JS, Granger CB, Thompson TD, Califf RM, Vahanian A, Bates ER, Topol EJ (1999) Cardiogenic shock in patients with acute ischemic syndromes with and without ST-segment elevation. Circulation 100:2067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hovdenes J, Laake JH, Aaberge L, Haugaa H, Bugge JF (2007) Therapeutic hypothermia after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: experiences with patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention and cardiogenic shock. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 51:137–142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huang R, Sacks J, Thai H, Goldman S, Morrison DA, Barbiere C, Ohm J (2005) Impact of stents and abciximab on survival from cardiogenic shock treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 65:25–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hypothermia after Cardiac Arrest Study Group (2002) Mild therapeutic hypothermia to improve the neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 346:549–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs AK, French JK, Col J, Sleeper LA, Slater JN, Carnendran L, Boland J, Jiang X, LeJemtel T, Hochman JS (2000) Cardiogenic shock with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded coronaries for Cardiogenic shocK? J Am Coll Cardiol 36:1091

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • John R, Long JW, Massey HT, Griffith BP, Sun BC, Tector AJ, Frazier OH, Joyce LD (2011) Outcomes of a multicenter trial of the Levitronix CentriMag ventricular assist system for short-term circulatory support. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 141:932–939

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, Niemelä K, Xavier D, Widimsky P, Budaj A, Niemelä M, Valentin V, Lewis BS, Avezum A, Steg PG, Rao SV, Gao P, Afzal R, Joyner CD, Chrolavicius S, Mehta SR, RIVAL trial group (2011) Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multi- centre trial. Lancet 377(9775):1409–1420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joyal D, Bertrand OF, Rinfret S, Shimony A, Eisenberg MJ (2012) Meta-analysis of ten trials on the effectiveness of the radial versus the femoral approach in primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 109(6):813–818

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kar B, Gregoric ID, Basra SS, Idelchik GM, Loyalka P (2011) The percutaneous ventricular assist device in severe refractory cardiogenic shock. J Am Coll Cardiol 57:688–696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kar B, Basra SS, Shah NR, Loyalka P (2012) Percutaneous circulatory support in cardiogenic shock: interventional bridge to recovery. Circulation 125:1809–1817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Katz JN, Stebbins AL, Alexander JH, Reynolds HR, Pieper KS, Ruzyllo W, Werdan K, Geppert A, Dzavik V, Van de Werf F, Hochman JS, For the TRIUMPH Investigators (2009) Predictors of 30-day mortality in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction despite a patent infarct artery. Am Heart J 158:680–687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Killip T, Kimball JT (1967) Treatment of myocardial infarction in a coronary care unit. A two-year experience with 250 patients. Am J Cardiol 20:457–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kinch JW, Ryan TJ (1994) Right ventricular infarction. N Engl J Med 330:1211–1217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koeckert MS, Jorde UP, Naka Y, Moses JW, Takayama H (2011) Impella LP 2.5 for left ventricular unloading during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. J Card Surg 26:666–668

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kornowski R, Mehran R, Dangas G, Nikolsky E, Assali A, Claessen BE, Gersh BJ, Wong SC, Witzenbichler B, Guagliumi G, Dudek D, Fahy M, Lansky AJ, Stone GW, Trial Investigators HORIZONS-AMI (2011) Prognostic impact of staged versus “one-time” multivessel percutaneous interventions in acute myocardial infarction: analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:704–711

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovack PJ, Rasak MA, Bates ER, Ohman EM, Stomel RJ (1997) Thrombolysis plus aortic counterpulsation: improved survival in patients who present to community hospitals with cardiogenic shock. J Am Coll Cardiol 29(7):1454–1458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lauten A, Engström AE, Jung C, Empen K, Erne P, Cook S, Windecker S, Bergmann MW, Klingenberg R, Lüscher TF, Haude M, Rulands D, Butter C, Ullman B, Hellgren L, Modena MG, Pedrazzini G, Henriques JP, Figulla HR, Ferrari M (2013) Percutaneous left-ventricular support with the Impella-2.5-assist device in acute cardiogenic shock: results of the Impella-EUROSHOCK-registry. Circ Heart Fail 6:23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee MS, Tseng CH, Barker CM, Menon V, Steckman D, Shemin R, Hochman JS (2008) Outcome after surgery and percutaneous intervention for cardiogenic shock and left main disease. Ann Thorac Surg 86:29–34

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lemaire A, Anderson MB, Lee LY, Scholz P, Prendergast T, Goodman A, Lozano AM, Spotnitz A, Batsides G (2014) The Impella device for acute mechanical circulatory support in patients in cardiogenic shock. Ann Thorac Surg 97:133–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Cercek B, Chambers CE, Ellis SG, Guyton RA, Hollenberg SM, Khot UN, Lange RA, Mauri L, Mehran R, Moussa ID, Mukherjee D, Nallamothu BK, Ting HH (2011) 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:e44–e122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lim HS, Farouque O, Andrianopoulos N, Yan BP, Lim CC, Brennan AL, Reid CM, Freeman M, Charter K, Black A, New G, Ajani AE, Duffy SJ, Clark DJ, Melbourne Interventional Group (2009) Survival of elderly patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2:146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Margey R, Chamakura S, Siddiqi S, Senapathi M, Schilling J, Fram D, Hirst J, Saddiq I, Silverman D, Kiernan F (2013) First experience with implantation of a percutaneous right ventricular Impella right side percutaneous support device as a bridge to recovery in acute right ventricular infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock in the United States. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 6:e37–e38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McMullan MH, Maples MD, Kilgore TL, Hindman SH (2001) Surgical experience with left ventricular free wall rupture. Ann Thorac Surg 71:1894–1898

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta RH, Lopes RD, Ballotta A, Frigiola A, Sketch MH Jr, Bossone E, Bates ER (2010) Percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass surgery for cardiogenic shock and multivessel coronary artery disease? Am Heart J 159:141–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Menon V, Webb JG, Hillis LD, Sleeper LA, Abboud R, Dzavik V, Slater JN, Forman R, Monrad ES, Talley JD, Hochman JS (2000a) Outcome and profile of ventricular septal rupture with cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry: SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries in cardiogenic shocK? J Am Coll Cardiol 36:1110–1116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Menon V, Slater JN, White HD, Sleeper LA, Cocke T, Hochman JS (2000b) Acute myocardial infarction complicated by systemic hypoperfusion without hypotension: report of the SHOCK trial registry. Am J Med 108:374–380

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyns B, Stolinski J, Leunens V, Verbeken E, Flameng W (2003) Left ventricular support by catheter-mounted axial flow pump reduces infarct size. J Am Coll Cardiol 41:1087–1095

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mirabel M, Luyt CE, Leprince P, Trouillet JL, Léger P, Pavie A, Chastre J, Combes A (2011) Outcomes, long-term quality of life, and psychologic assessment of fulminant myocarditis patients rescued by mechanical circulatory support. Crit Care Med 39:1029–1035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan P, Brutsaert DL, Paulus WJ, Sys SU (1996) Myocardial contractile response to nitric oxide and cGMP. Circulation 93:1223–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mylotte D, Morice MC, Eltchaninoff H, Garot J, Louvard Y, Lefèvre T, Garot P (2013) Primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, and cardiogenic shock: the role of primary multivessel revascularization. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 6:115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nanas JN, Nanas SN, Kontoyannis DA, Moussoutzani KS, Hatzigeorgiou JP, Heras PB, Makaritsis KP, Agapitos EB, Moulopoulos SD (1996) Myocardial salvage by the use of reperfusion and intraaortic balloon pump: experimental study. Ann Thorac Surg 61:629–634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, Casey DE Jr, Chung MK, de Lemos JA, Ettinger SM, Fang JC, Fesmire FM, Franklin BA, Granger CB, Krumholz HM, Linderbaum JA, Morrow DA, Newby LK, Ornato JP, Ou N, Radford MJ, Tamis-Holland JE, Tommaso CL, Tracy CM, Woo YJ, Zhao DX (2013) 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 61:e78–e140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oddo M, Schaller MD, Feihl F, Ribordy V, Liaudet L (2006) From evidence to clinical practice: effective implementation of therapeutic hypothermia to improve patient outcome after cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med 34:1865–1873

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill WW, Kleiman NS, Moses J, Henriques JP, Dixon S, Massaro J, Palacios I, Maini B, Mulukutla S, Dzavík V, Popma J, Douglas PS, Ohman M (2012) A prospective, randomized clinical trial of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus intra-aortic balloon pump in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the PROTECT II study. Circulation 126(14):1717–1727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill WW, Schreiber T, Wohns DH, Rihal C, Naidu SS, Civitello AB, Dixon SR, Massaro JM, Maini B, Ohman EM (2014) The current use of Impella 2.5 in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results from the USpella registry. J Interv Cardiol 27:1–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ortolani P, Marzocchi A, Marrozzini C, Palmerini T, Saia F, Serantoni C, Aquilina M, Silenzi S, Baldazzi F, Grosseto D, Taglieri N, Cooke RM, Bacchi-Reggiani ML, Branzi A (2006) Clinical impact of direct referral to primary percutaneous coronary intervention following pre-hospital diagnosis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 27:1550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ouweneel DM, Henriques JP (2012) Percutaneous cardiac support devices for cardiogenic shock: current indications and recommendations. Heart 98:1246–1254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oz MC, Argenziano M, Catanese KA, Gardocki MT, Goldstein DJ, Ashton RC, Gelijns AC, Rose EA, Levin HR (1997) Bridge experience with long-term implantable left ventricular assist devices. Circulation 95:1844–1852

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pagani FD, Lynch W, Swaniker F, Dyke DB, Bartlett R, Koelling T, Moscucci M, Deeb GM, Bolling S, Monaghan H, Aaronson KD (1999) Extracorporeal life support to left ventricular assist device bridge to heart transplant: a strategy to optimize survival and resource utilization. Circulation 100:II206–II210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Page DL, Caulfield JB, Kastor JA, DeSanctis RW, Sanders CA (1971) Myocardial changes associated with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 285:133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patel MR, Smalling RW, Thiele H, Barnhart HX, Zhou Y, Chandra P, Chew D, Cohen M, French J, Perera D, Ohman EM (2011) Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation and infarct size in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction without shock: the CRISP AMI randomized trial. JAMA 306:1329–1337

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pawale A, Pinney S, Ashley K, Flynn R, Milla F, Anyanwu AC (2013) Implantable left ventricular assist devices as initial therapy for refractory postmyocardial infarction cardiogenic shock. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 44:213–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peberdy MA, Callaway CW, Neumar RW, Geocadin RG, Zimmerman JL, Donnino M, Gabrielli A, Silvers SM, Zaritsky AL, Merchant R, Vanden Hoek TL, Kronick SL, American Heart Association (2010) Post-cardiac arrest care: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 122:S768–786

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Picard MH, Davidoff R, Sleeper LA, Mendes LA, Thompson CR, Dzavik V, Steingart R, Gin K, White HD, Hochman JS, SHOCK Trial (2003) SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK. Echocardiographic predictors of survival and response to early revascularization in cardiogenic shock. Circulation 107:279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Remmelink M, Sjauw KD, Henriques JP, de Winter RJ, Vis MM, Koch KT, Paulus WJ, de Mol BA, Tijssen JG, Piek JJ, Baan J (2010) Effects of mechanical left ventricular unloading by Impella on left ventricular dynamics in high-risk and primary percutaneous coronary intervention patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 75:187–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rokyta R, Pechman V, Tousek P, Pudil R, Lhotska J, Widimsky P (2013) Routine pretreatment with abciximab versus standard periprocedural therapy in mechanically ventilated cardiogenic shock patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Subanalysis of the PRAGUE-7 study. Exp Clin Cardiol 18:81–84

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rose EA, Gelijns AC, Moskowitz AJ, Heitjan DF, Stevenson LW, Dembitsky W, Long JW, Ascheim DD, Tierney AR, Levitan RG, Watson JT, Meier P, Ronan NS, Shapiro PA, Lazar RM, Miller LW, Gupta L, Frazier OH, Desvigne-Nickens P, Oz MC, Poirier VL, Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure (REMATCH) Study Group (2001) Long-term mechanical left ventricular assistance for end-stage heart failure. N Engl J Med 345:1435–1443

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sam F, Sawyer DB, Xie Z, Chang DL, Ngoy S, Brenner DA, Siwik DA, Singh K, Apstein CS, Colucci WS (2001) Mice lacking inducible nitric oxide synthase have improved left ventricular contractile function and reduced apoptotic cell death late after myocardial infarction. Circ Res 89:351–356

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanborn TA, Sleeper LA, Bates ER, Jacobs AK, Boland J, French JK, Dens J, Dzavik V, Palmeri ST, Webb JG, Goldberger M, Hochman JS (2000) Impact of thrombolysis, intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation, and their combination in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK? J Am Coll Cardiol 36:1123–1129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanborn TA, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, French JK, Bergman G, Parikh M, Wong SC, Boland J, Pfisterer M, Slater JN, Sharma S, Hochman JS, SHOCK Investigators (2003) Correlates of one-year survival in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: angiographic findings from the SHOCK trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 42:1373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer GT, Baker JN, Parks KA (2012) Heart rescue: the role of mechanical circulatory support in the management of severe refractory cardiogenic shock. Curr Opin Crit Care 18:409–416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scheidt S, Wilner G, Mueller H, Summers D, Lesch M, Wolff G, Krakauer J, Rubenfire M, Fleming P, Noon G, Oldham N, Killip T, Kantrowitz A (1973) Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in cardiogenic shock – report of a cooperative clinical trial. N Engl J Med 288:979–984

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schömig A, Kastrati A, Dirschinger J, Mehilli J, Schricke U, Pache J, Martinoff S, Neumann FJ, Schwaiger M (2000) Coronary stenting plus platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade compared with tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction. Stent versus Thrombolysis for Occluded Coronary Arteries in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 343:385–391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seyfarth M, Sibbing D, Bauer I, Fröhlich G, Bott-Flügel L, Byrne R, Dirschinger J, Kastrati A, Schömig A (2008) A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:1584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shah MR, Hasselblad V, Stevenson LW, Binanay C, O’Connor CM, Sopko G, Califf RM (2005) The impact of the pulmonary artery catheter on critically ill populations: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. JAMA 294:1664–1670

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheu JJ, Tsai TH, Lee FY, Fang HY, Sun CK, Leu S, Yang CH, Chen SM, Hang CL, Hsieh YK, Chen CJ, Wu CJ, Yip HK (2010) Early extracorporeal membrane oxygenator-assisted primary percutaneous coronary intervention improved 30-day clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated with profound cardiogenic shock. Crit Care Med 38:1810–1817

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sjauw KD, Remmelink M, Baan J, Lam K, Engström AE, van der Schaaf RJ, Vis MM, Koch KT, van Straalen JP, Tijssen JG, de Mol BA, de Winter RJ, Piek JJ, Henriques JP (2008) Left ventricular unloading in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients is safe and feasible and provides acute and sustained left ventricular recovery. J Am Coll Cardiol 51:1044–1046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sjauw KD, Konorza T, Erbel R, Danna PL, Viecca M, Minden HH, Butter C, Engstrøm T, Hassager C, Machado FP, Pedrazzini G, Wagner DR, Schamberger R, Kerber S, Mathey DG, Schofer J, Engström AE, Henriques JP (2009a) Supported high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with the Impella 2.5 device the Europella registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:2430–2434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sjauw KD, Engström AE, Vis MM, van der Schaaf RJ, Baan J Jr, Koch KT, de Winter RJ, Piek JJ, Tijssen JG, Henriques JP (2009b) A systematic review and meta-analysis of intra-aortic balloon pump therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: should we change the guidelines? Eur Heart J 30:459–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skulec R, Kovarnik T, Dostalova G, Kolar J, Linhart A (2008) Induction of mild hypothermia in cardiac arrest survivors presenting with cardiogenic shock syndrome. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 52:188–194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slater J, Brown RJ, Antonelli TA, Menon V, Boland J, Col J, Dzavik V, Greenberg M, Menegus M, Connery C, Hochman JS (2000) Cardiogenic shock due to cardiac free-wall rupture or tamponade after acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry: should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for cardiogenic shock? J Am Coll Cardiol 36:1117–1122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter MS, Rogers JG, Milano CA, Russell SD, Conte JV, Feldman D, Sun B, Tatooles AJ, Delgado RM, Long JW, Wozniak TC, Ghumman W, Farrar DJ, Frazier OH (2009) Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. N Engl J Med 361:2241–2251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smedira NG, Moazami N, Golding CM, McCarthy PM, Apperson-Hansen C, Blackstone EH, Cosgrove DM (2001) Clinical experience with 202 adults receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiac failure: survival at five years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 122:92–102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, Badano LP, Blömstrom-Lundqvist C, Borger MA, Di Mario C, Dickstein K, Ducrocq G, Fernandez-Aviles F, Gershlick AH, Giannuzzi P, Halvorsen S, Huber K, Juni P, Kastrati A, Knuuti J, Lenzen MJ, Mahaffey KW, Valgimigli M, van Hof A, Widimsky P, Zahger D, Task Force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) (2012) ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 33:2569–2619

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stone GW, Marsalese D, Brodie BR, Griffin JJ, Donohue B, Costantini C, Balestrini C, Wharton T, Esente P, Spain M, Moses J, Nobuyoshi M, Ayres M, Jones D, Mason D, Grines L, O’Neill WW, Grines CL (1997) A prospective, randomized evaluation of prophylactic intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in high risk patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 29:1459–1467

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Takayama H, Truby L, Koekort M, Uriel N, Colombo P, Mancini DM, Jorde UP, Naka Y (2013) Clinical outcome of mechanical circulatory support for refractory cardiogenic shock in the current era. J Heart Lung Transplant 32:106–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tayara W, Starling RC, Yamani MH, Wazni O, Jubran F, Smedira N (2006) Improved survival after acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock with circulatory support and transplantation: comparing aggressive intervention with conservative treatment. J Heart Lung Transplant 25:504–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tepe NA, Edmunds LH (1985) Operation for acute postinfarction mitral insufficiency and cardiogenic shock. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 89:525–530

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • The ESCAPE Investigators and ESCAPE Study Coordinators (2005) Evaluation study of congestive heart failure and pulmonary artery catheterization effectiveness: the ESCAPE trial. JAMA 294:1625–1633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The GUSTO, Investigators A (1993) The effects of tissue plasminogen activator, streptokinase, or both on coronary-artery patency, ventricular function, and survival after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 329:1615–1622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiele H, Sick P, Boudriot E, Diederich KW, Hambrecht R, Niebauer J, Schuler G (2005) Randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J 26:1276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, Ferenc M, Olbrich HG, Hausleiter J, Richardt G, Hennersdorf M, Empen K, Fuernau G, Desch S, Eitel I, Hambrecht R, Fuhrmann J, Böhm M, Ebelt H, Schneider S, Schuler G, Werdan K, IABP-SHOCK II Trial Investigators (2012) Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 367:1287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas HL, Dronavalli VB, Parameshwar J, Bonser RS, Banner NR, Steering Group of the UK Cardiothoracic Transplant Audit (2011) Incidence and outcome of Levitronix CentriMag support as rescue therapy for early cardiac allograft failure: a United Kingdom national study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 40:1348–1354

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tousek P, Rokyta R, Tesarova J, Pudil R, Belohlavek J, Stasek J, Rohac F, Widimsky P (2011) Routine upfront abciximab versus standard periprocedural therapy in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock: the PRAGUE-7 study. An open randomized multicentre study. Acute Card Care 13:116–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • TRIUMPH Investigators (2007) Effect of tilarginine acetate in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: the TRIUMPH randomized controlled trial. JAMA 297:1657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsukui H, Teuteberg JJ, Murali S, McNamara DM, Buchanan JR, Winowich S, Stanford E, Mathier MA, Cadaret LM, Kormos RL (2005) Biventricular assist device utilization for patients with morbid congestive heart failure: a justifiable strategy. Circulation 112:I65–I72

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van der Schaaf RJ, Claessen BE, Vis MM, Hoebers LP, Koch KT, Baan J Jr, Meuwissen M, Engstrom AE, Kikkert WJ, Tijssen JG, de Winter RJ, Piek JJ, Henriques JP (2010) Effect of multivessel coronary disease with or without concurrent chronic total occlusion on one-year mortality in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock. Am J Cardiol 105:955–959

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vlaar PJ, Mahmoud KD, Holmes DR Jr, van Valkenhoef G, Hillege HL, van der Horst IC, Zijlstra F, de Smet BJ (2011) Culprit vessel only versus multivessel and staged percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel disease in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a pairwise and network meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:692–703

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wald DS, Morris JK, Wald NJ, Chase AJ, Edwards RJ, Hughes LO, Berry C, Oldroyd KG, The PRAMI Investigators (2013) Randomized trial of preventive angioplasty in myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 369:1115–1123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Webb JG, Sanborn TA, Sleeper LA, Carere RG, Buller CE, Slater JN, Baran KW, Koller PT, Talley JD, Porway M, Hochman JS, Investigators SHOCK (2001) Percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock in the SHOCK Trial Registry. Am Heart J 141:964–970

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wellens HJ (1999) The value of the right precordial leads of the electrocardiogram. N Engl J Med 340:381–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • White HD, Assmann SF, Sanborn TA, Jacobs AK, Webb JG, Sleeper LA, Wong CK, Stewart JT, Aylward PE, Wong SC, Hochman JS (2005) Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results from the Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock (SHOCK) trial. Circulation 112:1992

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N, Di Mario C, Falk V, Folliguet T, Garg S, Huber K, James S, Knuuti J, Lopez-Sendon J, Marco J, Menicanti L, Ostojic M, Piepoli MF, Pirlet C, Pomar JL, Reifart N, Ribichini FL, Schalij MJ, Sergeant P, Serruys PW, Silber S, Sousa Uva M, Taggart D, Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) (2010) Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 31:2501–2555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wong SC, Sanborn T, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, Pilchik R, Hart D, Mejnartowicz S, Antonelli TA, Lange R, French JK, Bergman G, LeJemtel T, Hochman JS (2000) Angiographic findings and clinical correlates in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK? J Am Coll Cardiol 36:1077

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zeymer U, Vogt A, Zahn R, Weber MA, Tebbe U, Gottwik M, Bonzel T, Senges J, Neuhaus KL, Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK) (2004) Predictors of in-hospital mortality in 1333 patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); Results of the primary PCI registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK). Eur Heart J 25:322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arthur Reshad Garan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Cite this entry

Garan, A.R., Rabbani, L.E. (2015). Coronary Artery Interventions in Cardiogenic Shock. In: Lanzer, P. (eds) PanVascular Medicine. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37078-6_72

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37078-6_72

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-37077-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-37078-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics