Skip to main content

Quality and Safety of Home ICP Monitoring Compared with In-Hospital Monitoring

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Hydrocephalus

Part of the book series: Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum ((NEUROCHIRURGICA,volume 113))

Abstract

Introduction: Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is usually conducted in-hospital using stationary devices. Modern mobile ICP monitoring systems present new monitoring possibilities more closely following the patients’ daily life. We reviewed patient safety, quality of technical data, and adequacy for clinical evaluation in ICP monitoring in the home setting versus in-hospital monitoring.

Methods: Patients were divided into two subgroups (home or hospital monitoring). We noted technical curve quality and clinically useful parameters for both subgroups.

Results: Forty-four patients (aged 1–55 years) were included in this survey, with 50 sessions (home/in-hospital monitoring: 21/29). No difference was found in technical curve quality by comparing number of interruptions (p = 0.22), percentage of measurement duration with valid curve (p = 0.57), or the ability to perform adequate clinical evaluation of the data (p = 0.52). No clinically detectable complications were encountered in either group.

Conclusion: We propose home ICP monitoring as a feasible and safe alternative to in-hospital monitoring in select cases where the patient’s caregiver – with prior meticulous instructions – can adequately observe the patient during the monitoring session.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Blaha M, Lazar D, Winn RH, Ghatan S (2003) Hemorrhagic complications of intracranial pressure monitors in children. Pediatr Neurosurg 39(1):27–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Citerio G, Piper I, Chambers IR, Galli D, Enblad P, Kiening K et al (2008) Multicenter clinical assessment of the Raumedic Neurovent-P intracranial pressure sensor: a report by the BrainIT group. Neurosurgery 63(6):1152–1158; discussion 1158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Citerio G, Piper I, Cormio M, Galli D, Cazzaniga S, Enblad P et al (2004) Bench test assessment of the new Raumedic Neurovent-P ICP sensor: a technical report by the BrainIT group. Acta Neurochir 146(11):1221–1226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Czosnyka M, Brady K, Reinhard M, Smielewski P, Steiner LA (2009) Monitoring of cerebrovascular autoregulation: facts, myths, and missing links. Neurocrit Care 10(3):373–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Czosnyka M, Czosnyka Z, Momjian S, Pickard JD (2004) Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. Physiol Meas 25(5):R51–R76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schuhmann MU, Sood S, McAllister JP, Jaeger M, Ham SD, Czosnyka Z et al (2008) Value of overnight monitoring of intracranial pressure in hydrocephalic children. Pediatr Neurosurg 44(4):269–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stendel R, Heidenreich J, Schilling A, Akhavan-Sigari R, Kurth R, Picht T et al (2003) Clinical evaluation of a new intracranial pressure monitoring device. Acta Neurochir 145(3):185–193; discussion 193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tamburrini G, Di Rocco C, Velardi F, Santini P (2004) Prolonged intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring in non-traumatic pediatric neurosurgical diseases. Med Sci Monit 10(4):53–63

    Google Scholar 

  9. Taylor WA, Thomas NW, Wellings JA, Bell BA (1995) Timing of postoperative intracranial hematoma development and implications for the best use of neurosurgical intensive care. J Neurosurg 82(1):48–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yokota A, Matsuoka S, Ishikawa T, Kohshi K, Kajiwara H (1989) Overnight recordings of intracranial pressure and electroencephalography in neurosurgical patients. Part II: changes in intracranial pressure during sleep. J UOEH 11(4):383–391

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors received research grants from The Aase og Ejnar Danielsen Fund, The Augustinus Fund, and The Beckett Fund. We are grateful for their help and their support of this study.

Conflicts of interest statement We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Morten Andresen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Andresen, M., Juhler, M., Munch, T.N. (2012). Quality and Safety of Home ICP Monitoring Compared with In-Hospital Monitoring. In: Aygok, G., Rekate, H. (eds) Hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum, vol 113. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0923-6_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0923-6_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-0922-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-0923-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics