Skip to main content

Posterior and Cross-validatory Predictive Checks: A Comparison of MCMC and INLA

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Statistical Modelling and Regression Structures

Abstract

Model criticism and comparison of Bayesian hierarchical models is often based on posterior or leave-one-out cross-validatory predictive checks. Cross-validatory checks are usually preferred because posterior predictive checks are difficult to assess and tend to be too conservative. However, techniques for statistical inference in such models often try to avoid full (manual) leave-one-out cross-validation, since it is very time-consuming. In this paper we will compare two approaches for estimating Bayesian hierarchical models: Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) and integrated nested Laplace approximations (INLA). We review how both approaches allow for the computation of leave-one-out cross-validatory checks without re-running the model for each observation in turn. We then empirically compare the two approaches in an extensive case study analysing the spatial distribution of bovine viral diarrhoe (BVD) among cows in Switzerland.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Azzalini, A. & Capitano, A. (1999). Statistical applications of the multivariate skew normal distribution., Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 61: 579–602.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardinelli, L., Clayton, D. & Montomoli, C. (1995). Bayesian estimates of disease maps: How important are priors?, Statistics in Medicine 14: 2411–2431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, G. & Armitage, P. (1995). Mid-p confidence intervals: a brief review, Statistician 44: 417–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besag, J., York, J. & Mollié, A. (1991). Bayesian image restoration with two applications in spatial statistics, Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 43(1): 1–59.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bland, J. & Altman, D. (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement, Lancet i: 307–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breslow, N. & Clayton, D. (1993). Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models, Journal of the American Statistical Association 88: 9–25.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Casella, G. & Robert, C. (1996). Rao-Blackwellisation of sampling schemes, Biometrika 83: 81–94.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, D. & Bernardinelli, L. (1992). Bayesian methods for mapping disease risk, in J. Cuzick et al. (eds), Geographical and Environmental Epidemiology. Methods for Small Area Studies, Oxford University Press, pp. 205–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czado, C., Gneiting, T. & Held, L. (2009). Predictive model assessment for count data, Biometrics. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawid, A. P. (1984). Statistical theory: The prequential approach, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) 147: 278–292.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrmeir, L. (1992). Posterior mode estimation by extended kalman filtering for multivariate dynamic generalized linear models, Journal of the American Statistical Association 87: 501–509.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrmeir, L. & Kneib, T. (2009). Discussion of Rue et al. (2009), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 71: 367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahrmeir, L., Kneib, T. & Lang, S. (2004). Penalized structured additive regression for space-time data: a Bayesian perspective, Statistica Sinica 14(3): 731–761.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrmeir, L. & Lang, S. (2001). Bayesian inference for generalized additive mixed models based on Markov random field priors, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C. Applied Statistics 50(2): 201–220.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Geisser, S. (1993). Predictive Inference: An Introduction, Chapman & Hall, London.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, A. E. (1996). Model determination using sampling-based methods, in W. R. Gilks, S. Richardson & D. J. Spiegelhalter (eds), Markov chain Monte Carlo in Practice, Chapman & Hall, pp. 145–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, A. E. & Smith, A. F. M. (1990). Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities, Journal of the American Statistical Association 85(410): 398–409.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A., Meng, X.-L. & Stern, H. (1996). Posterior predictive assessment of model fitness via realized discrepancies, Statistica Sinica 6: 733–807.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gneiting, T. & Raftery, A. E. (2007). Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction, and estimation, Journal of the American Statistical Association 102: 359–378.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gössl, C., Auer, D. P. & Fahrmeir, L. (2001). Bayesian spatiotemporal inference in functional magnetic resonance imaging, Biometrics 57(2): 554–562.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hjort, N. L., Dahl, F. A. & Steinbakk, G. H. (2006). Post-processing posterior predictive p-values, Journal of the American Statistical Association 101(475): 1157–1174.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkwood, B. & Sterne, J. (2003). Medical Statistics, 2nd edn, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Held, L. & Rue, H. (2002). On block updating in Markov random field models for disease mapping, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 29(4): 597–614.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y., Nelder, J. A. & Pawitan, Y. (2006). Generalized Linear Models with Random Effects - Unified Analysis via H-likelihood, Chapman & Hall/CRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, E. C. & Spiegelhalter, D. J. (2003). Approximate cross-validatory predictive checks in disease-mapping methods, Statistics in Medicine 22(4): 1649–1660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, E. C. & Spiegelhalter, D. J. (2007). Identifying outliers in Bayesian hierarchical models: a simulation-based approach, Bayesian Analysis 2(2): 409–444.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Martino, S. & Rue, H. (2009). Implementing approximate Bayesian inference using Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation: A manual for the INLA program. http://www.math.ntnu.no/˜hrue/GMRFLib.

  • Natário, I. & Knorr-Held, L. (2003). Non-parametric ecological regression and spatial variation, Biometrical Journal 45(6): 670–688.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, M. A. & Raftery, A. E. (1994). Approximate Bayesian inference by the weighted likelihood bootstrap (with discussion), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 56: 3–48.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, L. I. (1990). The conditional predictive ordinate for the normal distribution, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 52: 175–184.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, M. (2008). Penalized loss functions for Bayesian model comparison, Biostatistics 9(3): 523–539.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Raftery, A. E. (1996). Hypothesis testing and model selection, in W. R. Gilks, S. Richardson & D. J. Spiegelhalter (eds), Markov chain Monte Carlo in Practice, Chapman & Hall, pp. 163–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riebler, A. & Held, L. (2009). The analysis of heterogeneous time trends in multivariate age-period-cohort models, Technical report, University of Zurich, Biostatistics Unit. Conditionally accepted for Biostatistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert, C. & Casella, G. (2004). Monte Carlo Statistical Methods, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rue, H. & Held, L. (2005). Gaussian Markov Random Fields: Theory and Applications, Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, London.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rue, H. & Martino, S. (2007). Approximate Bayesian inference for hierarchical Gaussian Markov random field models, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 137: 3177–3192.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rue, H., Martino, S. & Chopin, N. (2009). Approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations (with discussion), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 71: 319–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrödle, B. & Held, L. (2009). Evaluation of case reporting data from Switzerland: Spatio-temporal disease mapping using INLA, Technical report, University of Zurich, Biostatistics Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. R. & van der Linde, A. (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit (with discussion), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 64: 583–639.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, H. & Cressie, N. (2000). Posterior predictive model checks for disease mapping models, Statistics in Medicine 19: 2377–2397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, L. & Kadane, J. B. (1986). Accurate approximations for posterior moments and marginal densities, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 81(393): 82–86.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonhard Held .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Held, L., Schrödle, B., Rue, H. (2010). Posterior and Cross-validatory Predictive Checks: A Comparison of MCMC and INLA. In: Kneib, T., Tutz, G. (eds) Statistical Modelling and Regression Structures. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2413-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics