Abstract
Open a medical textbook; lie down upon a physician’s examining table; attend grand rounds at a teaching hospital; and you find yourself immersed in a complex web of discourses and practices which together constitute the paradigm of modern medicine. This paradigm involves certain governing assumptions which are often overlooked because they are simply taken for granted. These include assumptions concerning the nature of disease entities, the canons of acceptable explanation, the modes of proper treatment. Moreover, such assumptions can ultimately be traced back to an implicit metaphysics. Ours is not a medicine of evil spirits or angry Gods, but of material causes and manifestations. If we are to understand the strengths and limits of our medicine and envision its alternatives, we must come to grips with the world-view it assumes. In what follows I shall address a key aspect of this world-view — the notion of “body” operative in modern medicine. After doing so, I will suggest a relevant alternative developed in twentieth-century phenomenology: that is, the model of the “lived body”.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
This discussion of Descartes, Cartesian medicine, and the corpse, draws closely upon a previous work of mine ([12], pp. 138-148).
Ironically, while Cartesian metaphysics may be at the root of our mechanistic medicine, Descartes himself was something of a “holistic practitioner”: in his correspondence with Princess Elizabeth, he emphasizes the importance of diet, exercise, but most of all, cultivating positive thinking, as treatment for her maladies ([5], pp. 153, 161-163).
Bibliography
Baron, R. J.: 1985, ‘An Introduction to Medical Phenomenology: I Can’t Hear You While I’m Listening’, Annals of Internal Medicine 103, 606–611.
Brentano, F.: 1973, Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint (ed. Oskar Kraus, transl. by Antos C. Rancurello, D. B. Terrell, and Linda L. McAlister), Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, U.K.
Buytendijk, F. J. J.: 1974, Prolegomena to an Anthropological Physiology, Duquesne University Press, Pittsburgh, PA.
Capra, F.: 1983, The Turning Point, Bantam Books, New York, NY.
Descartes, R.: 1970, Philosophical Letters (transl. and ed. by Anthony Kenny), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.
Descartes, R.: 1911, The Philosophical Works of Descartes, Vol. 1 (transl. by Elizabeth S. Haldane and G. R. T. Ross), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Descartes, R.: 1972, Treatise of Man (transl. and ed. by Thomas Steele Hall), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Engelhardt, H. T., Jr.: 1986, The Foundations of Bioethics, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
Foucault, M.: 1975, The Birth of the Clinic (transl. by A. M. Sheridan Smith), Vintage Books, New York, NY.
Heidegger, M.: 1977, The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays (transl. by William Lovitt), Harper and Row, New York, NY.
Jonas, H.: 1966, The Phenomenon of Life, University of Chicago Press, IL.
Leder, D.: 1990, The Absent Body, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Leder, D.: 1984, ‘Medicine and Paradigms of Embodiment’, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 9, 29–43.
Marcel, G.: 1956, Being and Having: An Existentialist Diary (transl. by K. Farrer), Harper and Row, New York, NY.
Marcel, G.: 1952, Metaphysical Journal (transl. Bernard Wall), Henry Regnery Co., Chicago, IL.
Merchant, C.: 1980, The Death of Nature, Harper and Row, San Francisco, CA.
Merleau-Ponty, M.: 1962, Phenomenology of Perception (transl. by Colin Smith), Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, U.K.
Merleau-Ponty, M.: 1968, The Visible and the Invisible (transl. by Alphonso Lingus), Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL.
Plügge, H.: 1967, Der Mensch und sein Leib, Max Niemeyer Verlag, Tubingen, Germany.
Plügge, H.: 1962, Wohlbefinden und Missbefinden, Max Niemeyer Verlag, Tubingen, Germany.
Reiser, S.: 1978, Medicine and the Reign of Technology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Straus, E.: 1966, Phenomenological Psychology (transl. by Erling Eng), Basic Books, New York, NY.
Straus, E.: 1963, The Primary World of Senses (transl. by Jacob Needleman), The Free Press of Glencoe, Glencoe, NY.
van den Berg, J. H.: 1952, The Human Body and the Significance of Human Movement’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 13, 159–183.
Vrooman, J. R.: 1970, René Descartes: A Biography, G. P. Putnam’s Sons, New York, NY.
Zaner, R.: 1964, The Problem of Embodiment, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands.
Zaner, R.: 1981, The Context of Self: A Phenomenological Inquiry Using Medicine as a Clue, Ohio University Press, Athens, OH.
Zaner, R.: 1988, Ethics and the Clinical Encounter, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Leder, D. (1992). A Tale of Two Bodies: The Cartesian Corpse and the Lived Body. In: Leder, D. (eds) The Body in Medical Thought and Practice. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 43. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7924-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7924-7_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4140-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-7924-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive