Definition
The model of selection, optimization, and compensation (SOC) encompasses three processes of action regulation in respect to successful aging and life-management: Selection refers to the setting and prioritization of goals, based on personal motives and preferences (elective selection) or due to perceived loss of internal or contextual resources (loss-based selection). Optimization involves the obtainment, improvement, and coordinated use of individual means to pursue important selected goals. Compensation involves the acquisition and application of alternative individual means or the utilization of external or technological aids to substitute lost means.
The Model of Selection, Optimization, and Compensation
Individual well-being and productivity across the lifespan depend largely on access to resources. In terms of the Conservation of Resources Theory (COR) resources can be considered as...
References
Abraham, J. D., & Hansson, R. O. (1995). Successful aging at work: An applied study of selection, optimization, and compensation through impression management. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 50, 94–103.
Bajor, J. K., & Baltes, B. B. (2003). The relationship between selection optimization with compensation, conscientiousness, motivation, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 347–367.
Baltes, P. B. (1997). On the incomplete architecture of human ontogeny: Selection, optimization, and compensation as foundation of developmental theory. American Psychologist, 52, 366–380.
Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In P. B. Baltes & M. M. Baltes (Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 1–34). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Baltes, B. B., & Heydens-Gahir, H. A. (2003). Reduction of work-family conflict through the use of selection, optimization, and compensation behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 1005–1018.
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., & Leiter, M. (2014). Burnout and job performance: The moderating role of selection, optimization, and compensation strategies. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19, 96–107.
Dewe, P., O’Driscoll, M. P., & Cooper, C. L. (2010). Coping with work stress. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Fresco, D. M., Williams, N. L., & Nugent, N. R. (2006). Flexibility and negative affect: Examining the associations of explanatory flexibility and coping flexibility to each other and to depression and anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 30, 201–210.
Freund, A. M., & Baltes, P. B. (2002). Life-management strategies of selection, optimization and compensation: Measurement by self-report and construct validity. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 82, 642–662.
Hobfoll, S. E. (2002). Social and psychological resources and adaptations. Review of General Psychology, 6, 307–324.
Müller, A., Weigl, M., Heiden, B., Glaser, J., & Angerer, P. (2012). Promoting work ability and well-being in hospital nursing: The interplay of age, job control, and successful ageing strategies. WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation, 41, 5137–5144.
Müller, A., et al. (2013a). Selection, optimization, and compensation in nursing: Exploration of job-specific strategies, scale development, and age-specific associations to work ability. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69, 1630–1642.
Müller, A., De Lange, A. H., Weigl, M., Oxfart, C., & Van der Heijden, B. (2013b). Compensating losses in bridge employment? Examining relations between compensation strategies, health problems, and intention to remain at work. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83, 68–77.
Riedel, N., Müller, A., Ebener, M. (2015). Applying strategies of selection, optimization and compensation to maintain work ability – A psychosocial resource complementing the job demand-control model? Results from the representative lidA cohort study on work, age, and health in Germany. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, doi:10.1097/JOM.0000000000000402.
Riediger, M., Li, S.-C., & Lindenberger, U. (2006). Selection, optimization, and compensation as developmental mechanisms of adaptive resource allocation: Review and preview. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (6th ed., pp. 289–314). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Schmitt, A., Zacher, H., & Frese, M. (2012). The buffering effect of selection, optimization, and compensation strategy use on the relationship between problem solving demands and occupational well-being: A daily diary study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17, 139–149.
von Bonsdorff, M. E., et al. (2014). Organizational justice, selection, optimization with compensation, and nurses’ work ability. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 56, 326–330.
Weigl, M., Müller, A., Hornung, S., Zacher, H., & Angerer, P. (2013). The moderating effects of job control and selection, optimization, and compensation strategies on the age–work ability relationship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 607–628.
Weigl, M., Müller, A., Leidenberger, M., & Heiden, B. (2014). Job resources and work engagement: The contributing role of selection, optimization, and compensation strategies at work. Journal for Labour Market Research, 47, 299–312.
Wiese, B. S., Freund, A. M., & Baltes, P. B. (2000). Selection, optimization, and compensation: An action-related approach to work and partnership. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57, 273–300.
Wiese, B. S., Freund, A. M., & Baltes, P. B. (2002). Subjective career success and emotional well-being: Longitudinal predictive power of selection, optimization and compensation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60, 321–335.
Yeung, D. Y., & Fung, H. H. (2009). Aging and work: How do SOC strategies contribute to job performance across adulthood? Psychology and Aging, 24, 927–940.
Young, L. M., Baltes, B. B., & Pratt, A. K. (2007). Using selection, optimization, and compensation to reduce job/family stressors: Effective when it matters. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21, 511–539.
Zacher, H., & Frese, M. (2011). Maintaining a focus on opportunities at work: The interplay between age, job complexity, and the use of selection, optimization, and compensation strategies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 291–318.
Zacher, H., Chan, F., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E. (2015). Selection, optimization, and compensation strategies: Interactive effects on daily work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 87, 101–107.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this entry
Cite this entry
Müller, A., Weigl, M. (2015). Selection, Optimization, and Compensation at Work in Relation to Age. In: Pachana, N. (eds) Encyclopedia of Geropsychology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-080-3_28-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-080-3_28-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-080-3
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences