Skip to main content
Log in

ERG electrode in pedriatic patients: Comparison of DTL fiber, PVA-gel, and non-corneal skin electrodes

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hard contact lens electrodes have been the type most frequently used in pediatric electroretinogroply but they are not well-tolerated by patients. The Dawson Trick Litzkow fiber electrode is better tolerated but it is fragile and difficult to sterilize. A new electrode made from anomalous polyvinyl alcohol gel is inexpensive, has stable electrical recording properties, and can be discarded after use. Dermal electrodes have been used for electroretinogram recording for some time; however, there are few reports that directly compare their performance against standard contact lens assemblies. We compared the DTL and the polyvinyl gel electrodes in the same group of subjects and investigated their recording characteristics along with non corneal skin electrodes placed on the infraorbital ridge. Signal-averaged electroretinogram were obtained under both scotopic and photopic stimulation conditions and the implicit time and amplitudes of the a- and b-waves were determined. Overall, dermal recordings generally had shorter implicit times and lower amplitudes than with the fiber or gel electrodes. The dermal electrodes were best tolerated and outlasted the corneal in repeated use. Since amplitude characteristics of the dermal electrodes were generally about 50% of that obtained with corneal electrodes, we feel that under standardized conditions they are acceptable for most clinical recording situations in infants and young children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burian HM, Allen L. A speculum contact lens electrode for electroretinography. EEG Clin Neurophysiol 1954; 6: 509–11.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dawson WW, Trick GL, Litzkow CA, (19795) Improved electrode for electroretinography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 19795 18: 988–91.

  3. Honda Y, Nao-I N, Kim S, Sakaue E, Nambu M. New disposable ERG electrode made of anomalous polyvinyl alcohol gel. Doc Ophthalmol 19865 63: 205–207.

  4. Gutrow-Tyler JF, Crews SJ, Drasdo N. Electroretinography with noncorneal and corneal electrodes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 19785 17: 1124–7.

  5. Cringle SJ, Alder VA, Brown MJ, Yu DY, Effect of scleral recording location on ERG amplitude. Curr Eye Res 19865 5: 959–65.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coupland, S.G., Janaky, M. ERG electrode in pedriatic patients: Comparison of DTL fiber, PVA-gel, and non-corneal skin electrodes. Doc Ophthalmol 71, 427–433 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00152771

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00152771

Key words

Navigation