Skip to main content
Log in

Check-size specific changes of pattern electroretinogram in patients with early open-angle glaucoma

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The pattern electroretinogram was recorded in patients with initial stages of visual field defects due to open-angle glaucoma and in age-matched normal subjects. Both normal subjects and glaucoma patients had a visual acuity above 0.8. Counterphasing checkerboard patterns were used as visual stimuli with a range of check sizes from 0.8° to 15° at 7.8 reversals/s. Whereas the amplitude in glaucoma patients was nearly normal for large check sizes, it was significantly reduced for small check sizes (p = 0.003). Possibly two separate mechanisms that generate the pattern electroretinogram for small and large checks are differentially affected; they may be related to the magnocellular and parvocellular systems. The difference between normals and glaucoma patients was even more significant when the ratios of the amplitudes at small and large check sizes were compared (p < 0.0002). When this ratio is used, the amplitude variability can be partly overcome and the pattern electroretinogram can be a sensitive indicator of ganglion cell function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Drance SM, Airaksinen PJ. Signs of early damage in open-angle glaucoma. In: Weinstein GW, ed. Open-angle glaucoma. Contemporary issues in ophthalmology series, volume 3, Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1986; 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wanger P, Persson HE. Pattern-reversal electroretinograms in unilateral glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1983; 24: 749–53.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Papst N, Bopp M, Schnaudigel OE. Helligkeits- und Muster-ERG bei fortgeschrittenem Glaukom. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1984; 184: 199–201.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ringens PJ, Vijfvinkel-Bruinenga S, van Lith GHM. The pattern elicited electroretinogram 1. A tool in the early detection of glaucoma? Ophthalmologica, 1986; 192: 171–5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aulhorn E, Karmeyer H. Frequency distribution in early glaucomatous visual field defects. Doc Ophthal Proc Series 1976; 14: 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Trick GL, Wintermeyer DH. Spatial and temporal frequency tuning of pattern-reversal retinal potentials. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci 1982; 23: 774–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Röver J, Bach M. The pattern ERG and VEP in malingering patients. Doc Ophthalmol 1987; 66: 245–51.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Holder GE, Huber MJE. The effect of miosis on pattern and flash electroretinogram and pattern visual evoked potential. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Series 1984; 40: 109–16.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Arden GB, Carter RM, Hogg CR, Siegel LM, Margolis S. A gold foil electrode: extending the horizons for clinical electroretinography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1979; 18: 421–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Spekreijse H, Estevez O, van der Tweel LH. Luminance responses to pattern reversal. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Series 1973; 10: 205–11.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Trick GL. Retinal potentials in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma: physiological evidence for temporal frequency tuning deficits. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1985; 26: 1750–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Drasdo N, Thompson DA, Thompson CM, Edwards L. Complementary components and local variations of the pattern electroretinogram. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987; 28: 158–62.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Perry VH, Oehler R, Cowey A. Retinal ganglion cells that project to the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus in the macaque monkey. Neuroscience 1984; 12: 1101–23.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kaplan E, Shapley RM. The primate retina contains two types of ganglion cells, with high and low contrast sensitivity. Proc Nat Acad Sci 1986; USA 83: 2755–7.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Quigley HA, Sanchez RM, Dunkelberger R, L'Hernault NL, Baginski TA. Chronic glaucoma selectively damages large optic nerve fibers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987; 28: 913–20.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hess RF, Baker CL, Verhoeve JN, Keesey UT, France TD. The pattern-evoked electroretinogram: its variability in normals and its relationship to amblyopia. Invest Oph Vis Sci 1985; 26: 1610–23.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wanger P, Persson HE. Pattern-reversal electroretinograms in ocular hypertension. Doc Ophthalmol 1985; 61: 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bach, M., Hiss, P. & Röver, J. Check-size specific changes of pattern electroretinogram in patients with early open-angle glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol 69, 315–322 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00154412

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00154412

Key words

Navigation