Skip to main content
Log in

Light-sense, flicker and resolution perimetry in glaucoma: a comparative study

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A total of 106 eyes of 106 patients with different types of glaucoma were examined by automated light-sense, flicker and resolution perimetry (Humphrey Field Analyzer, program 30-2; flicker perimeter as described by Lachenmayr [16, 18]; resolution perimeter as devised by Fris'en [4, 6, 8–11]). The fields were classified in a masked fashion as being normal or as having purely diffuse loss, purely localized loss or diffuse as well as localized loss. As compared with light-sense perimetry, resolution perimetry had a markedly lower sensitivity in the detection of glaucomatous damage (77%) but a high specificity (93%); the comparison of resolution perimetry with flicker perimetry showed similar results (sensitivity, 75%; specificity, 85%). When flicker perimetry was compared with light-sense perimetry and vice versa, the sensitivity was high (95% and 94%, respectively), but the specificity was low (57% and 62%, respectively). The prevalence of detection of diffuse loss by both light-sense and resolution perimetry was related to visual acuity, whereas flicker perimetry did not show such a relationship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aulhorn E, Karmeyer H (1977) Frequency distribution in early glaucomatous visual field defects. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 14:75–83

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bebie H, Hammer J, Bebie Th (1989) The cumulative defect curve: separation of local and diffuse components of visual field damage. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 127:9–12

    Google Scholar 

  3. Caprioli J, Sears M, Miller JM (1987) Patterns of early visual field loss in open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 103:512–517

    Google Scholar 

  4. Douglas GR, Drance SM, Mikelberg FS, Schulzer M, Wijsman K (1989) Variability of the Frisén ring perimeter. In: Heijl A (ed) Perimetry update 1988/1989. Proceedings of the International Perimetric Society meeting, Vancouver 1988. Kugler & Ghedini, Amsterdam Berkeley Milan, pp 197–198

    Google Scholar 

  5. Drance SM (1985) The glaucoma visual field defect and its progression. In: Drance SM, Anderson D (eds) Automatic perimetry in glaucoma. A practical guide. Grune and Stratton, Orlando, pp 35–42

    Google Scholar 

  6. Drance SM, Douglas GR, Schulzer M, Wijsman K (1989) The learning effect of the Frisén high pass resolution perimeter. In: Heijl A (ed) Perimetry update 1988/1989. Proceedings of the International Perimetric Society meeting, Vancouver 1988. Kugler & Ghedini, Amsterdam Berkeley Milan, pp 199–201

    Google Scholar 

  7. Flammer J (1985) Psychophysics in glaucoma. A modified concept of the disease. In: Greve EL, Leydhecker W, Raitta C (eds) The second European glaucoma symposium. Junk, The Hague, pp 11–17

    Google Scholar 

  8. Frisén L (1987) A computer-graphics visual field screener using high-pass spatial frequency resolution targets and multiple feedback devices. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 49:441–461

    Google Scholar 

  9. Frisén L (1987) High pass resolution targets in peripheral vision. Ophthalmology 94:1104–1108

    Google Scholar 

  10. Frisén L (1988) Acuity perimetry: estimation of neural channels. Int Ophthalmol 12:169–174

    Google Scholar 

  11. Frisén L (1989) High pass resolution perimetry. In: Heijl A (ed) Perimetry update 1988/1989. Proceedings of the International Perimetric Society meeting, Vancouver 1988. Kugler & Ghedini, Amsterdam Berkeley Milan, pp 369–375

    Google Scholar 

  12. Glowazki A, Flammer J (1987) Is there a difference between glaucoma patients with rather localized visual field damage and patients with more diffuse visual field damage? Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 49:317–320

    Google Scholar 

  13. Heijl A (1985) The Humphrey Field Analyzer, construction and concepts. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 42:77–84

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kaufmann H, Flammer J (1989) Clinical experience with the Bebie curve. In: Heijl A (ed) Perimetry update 1988/1989. Proceedings of the International Perimetric Society meeting, Vancouver 1988. Kugler & Ghedini, Amsterdam Berkeley Milan, pp 235–238

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kleberger E (1954) Untersuchungen über die Verschmelzungsfrequenz intermittierenden Lichts an gesunden und kranken Augen: I. Mitteilung. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 155:314–323

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lachenmayr B (1988) Analyse der zeitlich-räumlichen Übertragungseigenschaften des visuellen Systems — ein newer Weg zur Frühdiagnose von Netzhaut- und Sehnerverkrankungen? Thesis (Habilitationsschrift), Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lachenmayr B, Drance SM, Chanhan BC, House PH, Lalani S (1991) Diffuse and localized glaucomatous field loss in light-sense, flicker and resolution perimetry: evidence for pressure-induced damage. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalamol 229:262–273

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lachenmayr B, Rothbächer H, Gleissner M (1989) Automated flicker perimetry versus quantitative static perimetry in early glaucoma. In: Heijl A (ed) Perimetry update 1988/1989. Proceedings of the International Perimetric Society meeting, Vancouver 1988. Kugler & Ghedini, Amsterdam Berkeley Milan, pp 359–368

    Google Scholar 

  19. Weinreb RN, Perlman JP (1986) The effect of refractive correction on automated perimetric thresholds. Am J Ophthalmol 101:706–709

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This study was supported by research grant La517/2-1 (B. Lachenmayr) from the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG, Bonn, FRG) and by Medical Research Council of Canada grant 1578

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lachenmayr, B.J., Drance, S.M., Douglas, G.R. et al. Light-sense, flicker and resolution perimetry in glaucoma: a comparative study. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 229, 246–251 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167877

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167877

Keywords

Navigation