Skip to main content
Log in

The prognostic significance of postoperative residual contrast enhancement on CT scan in pediatric patients with medulloblastoma

  • Clinical Study
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The clinical and therapeutic features of 20 patients with medulloblastoma treated at Childrens' Hospital and Medical Center, Seattle, from 1980 to 1987, were retrospectively analyzed with regard to prognosis. The overall actuarial 5-year survival rate was 63%, with 57% of patients free from recurrence at 5 years. Residual contrast enhancement on CT scans taken immediately postoperatively was associated with a significantly decreased 5-year recurrence-free survival rate; the 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was 100% for those patients without post-operative residual enhancement compared to 41% for those patients with residual enhancement. A high risk group of patients with residual contrast enhancement persisting one year following diagnosis was identified. No patient in this group survived without disease progression. Other factors, including sex, age at diagnosis, evidence of tumor dissemination, or extent of surgical resection as reported by the neurosurgeon, did not significantly influence prognosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bellani FF, Gasparini M, Lombardi F, Zucali R, Lucarelli G, Mighavacca F, Moise S, Nicola G: Medulloblastoma. Results of a sequential combined treatment. Cancer 54: 1956–61, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brand WN, Schneider PA, Tokars RP: Long term results for a pilot study of low dose cranial-spinal irradiation for cerebellar medulloblastoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 13: 1641–1645, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  3. Caputy AJ, McCullough CC, Manz HJ, Patterson K, Hammock MK: A review of the factors influencing the prognosis of medulloblastoma. J Neurosurg 66: 88–87, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hughes EN, Shillito J, Sallan SE, Loeffler JS, Cassady JR, Tarbell NJ: Medulloblastoma at the Joint Center for Radiation Therapy between 1968 and 1984. The influence of radiation dose on the patterns of failure and survival. Cancer 61: 1992–1998, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jenkin MB, Goddard K, Armstrong D, Becker L, Berry M, Chan H, Doherty M, Greenberg M, Hendrick B, Hoffman H, Humphreys R, Sonley M, Weitzman S, Zipursky A: Posterior fossa medulloblastoma in childhood: Treatment Results and a proposal for a new staging system. Int J Rad Oncology Biol Phys 19: 265–274, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kopelson G, Linggood RM, Keinman GM: Medulloblastoma. The identification of prognostic subgroups and implications for multimodality therapy. Cancer 51: 312–319, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  7. Levin VA, Rodriguez LA, Edwards MSBWW, Liu HC, Fulton D, Davis RL, Wilson CB, Silver P: Treatment of medulloblastoma with procarbazine, hydroxyurea, and reduced radiation doses to whole brain and spine. J Neurosurg 68: 383–387, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  8. Packer RJ, Sutton LN, Rorke LB, Littman PA, Sposto R, Rosenstock JG, Bruce DA, Shut L: Prognostic importance of cellular differentiation in medulloblastoma of childhood. J Neurosurg 61: 296–301, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stiller CA, Lennox EL: Childhood medulloblastoma in Britain 1971–77: an analysis of treatment and survival. Br J Cancer 48: 835–841, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  10. Allen JC, Epstein F: Medulloblastoma and other primary malignant neuroectodermal tumors of the CNS — the effect of patients' age and extent of disease on prognosis. J Neurosurg 57: 446–451, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  11. Berry MP, Jenkin RDT, Keen CW, Nair BD, Simpson WJ: Radiation treatment of medulloblastoma. A 21 year review. J Neurosurg 55: 43–51, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bloom HJG: Medulloblastoma: prognosis and prospects. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2: 1031–1033, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chang CH, Housepian EM, Herbert C: An operative staging system and megavoltage radiotherapeutic technic for cerebellar medulloblastomas. Radiology 107: 359–362, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chatty EM, Earle KM: Medulloblastoma: A report of 201 cases with emphasis on the relationships of histologic variants to survival. Cancer 28: 977–983, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  15. Deutsch M: Medulloblastoma-staging and treatment outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 14: 1103–1107, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  16. Evans AE, Jenkin RDT, Sposto R, Ortega JA, Wilson CB, Wara W, Ertel IJ, Kramer S, Chang CH, Leiken SL, Hammond GD: The treatment of medulloblastoma. The results of a prospective randomized trial of radiation therapy with and without chloroethyl-cyclohexyl nitrosurea, vincristine and prednisone. J Neurosurg 72: 572–582, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  17. Harisiadis L, Chang CH: Medulloblastoma in children: A correlation between staging and results of treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2: 833–841, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  18. MacFarland DR, Horwitz H, Saenger EL, Bahr GK: Medulloblastoma: A review of prognosis and survival. Br J Radiol 42: 198–214, 1969

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pendergrass TW, Milstein JM, Geyer JR, Mulne AF, Kosnik EJ, Morris JD, Heideman RL, Ruymann FB, Stuntz JT, Bleyer WA: Eight drugs in one day chemotherapy for brain tumors: Experience in 107 children and rationale for preradiation chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 5(8): 1221–1281, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cutler SJ, Ederer F: Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival. J Chronic Dis 8: 699–712, 1958

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mantel N, Haenszel W: Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. JNCI 22: 719–748, 1959

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tait DM, Thornton-Jones H, Bloom HJG, Lemerle J, Morris-Jones P: Adjuvant chemotherapy for medulloblastoma: the first multi-centre control trial of the international society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOPI) Eur J Cancer 26: 464–469, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hope-Stone H: Results of treatment of medulloblastoma. J Neurosurg 32: 83–88, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  24. Landberg TG, Lindgren ML, Cavallin-Stahl EK: Improvements in the radiotherapy of medulloblastoma 1946–1975. Cancer 45: 670–678, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  25. Quest DO, Brisman R, Antunes JL, Housepian EM: Period of risk for recurrence in medulloblastoma. J Neurosurg 48: 159–163, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jeffries BF; Kishore PRS, Singh KS, Ghatak NR, Krempa J: Contrast enhancement in the postoperative brain. Radiology 139: 409–413, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  27. Laohaprasit V, Silbergeld DL, Ojemann GA, Eskridge JM, Winn HR: Postoperative CT contrast enhancement following lobectomy for epilepsy. J Neurosurg 73: 392–395, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cairncross JG, Pexman JW, Rathbone MP, DelMaestro RF: Postoperative contrast enhancement in patients with brain tumor. Ann Neurol 17: 570–572, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  29. Waikai S, Andoh Y, Ochiai C, Inoh S, Nagai M: Postoperative contrast enhancement in brain tumors and intracerebral hematomas: CT study. J Comput Assist Tomograph 14: 267–271, 1990

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bourne, J.P., Geyer, R., Berger, M. et al. The prognostic significance of postoperative residual contrast enhancement on CT scan in pediatric patients with medulloblastoma. J Neuro-Oncol 14, 263–270 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172602

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172602

Key words

Navigation