Skip to main content
Log in

Contribution of the His angle to the gastroesophageal antireflux mechanism

  • Main Topic
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The high pressure zone (HPZ) is a result of a series of combative forces that converge in the gastroesophageal junction and contribute to generate the pressure barrier. Recognized factors in this function are the positive intra-abdominal pressure transmitted to the lower esophagus, thoracic suction, the diaphragmatic hiatus, the intrinsic lower esophageal sphincter, and the effect of gastric fundus acting on the distal esophagus through the His angle. The exclusive and quantitative role of the His angle is evaluated with the help of two experimental models (in vivo and in vitro) in the dog. By manometric procedures the gastric pressure at which the sphincter opens (OP) is studied under overloaded conditions, both in the living animal and in a gastroesophageal specimen, varying the His angle from 90° to 0°. In the “in vivo” model the pressure of the barrier with a His angle of 90° was 7.33 ± 3.4 mm Hg and the OP of 8.66 +- 4.1 mm Hg, while with the His angle at 0° the pressure of this barrier was 10.66 +- 2.9 mm Hg and the OP 16 +- 6.9 mm Hg (p < 0.05). In the “in vitro” model the His angle at 0° multiplied the OP two or three times. We conclude that the His angle at 0° allows transmission of the fundic pressure extrinsically to the sphincter, giving way to a higher OP, and increasing the degree of competence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Altschuler SM, Nixon TE, Boyle JT (1985) Crural diaphragmatic contraction: a component of the gastroesophageal antireflux mechanism. The American Pediatric Society and the Society for Pediatric Research. Abstract no. 608, p 212 A

  2. Bardají C, Boix Ochoa J (1985) Contribución del ángulo de His al mecanismo anti reflujo gastroesofágico. Estudio experimental. XXV Congreso Internacional de la Sociedad Española de Cirugía Pediátrica y III Latino-Americano, Bilbao

  3. Bardají C, Pettersson GB, Boix Ochoa J (1985) Estudio de la barrera antirreflujo gastroesofágico en el perro. III. Polsko-Hiszpanska Konferencja Naukowa Chirurgow Dzieciecych, Warszawa

    Google Scholar 

  4. Biancani P, Goyal RK, Phillips A, Spiro HM (1973) Mechanics of sphincter action: studies on lower esophageal sphincter. J Clin Invest 52: 2973–2978

    Google Scholar 

  5. De Meester TR, Wernly JA, Bryant GH, Little AG, Skinner DB (1979) Clinical and in vitro analysis of determinants of gastroesophageal competence. Am J Surg 137: 39–46

    Google Scholar 

  6. Friedland GW, Shoichi Kohatsu, Levin K (1971) Comparative anatomy, of feline and canine gastric sling fibers. Digest Dis 16: 495–507

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fyke FE, Code CE, Schlegel JF (1956) The gastroesophageal sphincter in healthy human beings. Gastroenterologia 86: 135–150

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gahagan T (1962) The function of the musculature of the esophagus and stomach in the esophagogastric sphincter mechanism. Surg Gynecol Obstet 293–303

  9. Ingelfinger FJ (1958) Esophageal motility. Physiol Rev 38: 533–539

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ingram PR, Respess JC, Muller WH Jr (1959) The role of an intrinsic sphincter mechanism in the prevention of reflux esophagitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 109: 659–664

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liebermann-Mefert D, Allgower M, Schmid P, Blum AL (1979) Muscular equivalent of the lower esophageal sphincter. Gastroenterology 76: 31–38

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mann CV, Ellis FH, Schlegel JE, Code CF (1964) Abdominal displacement of the canine gastroesophageal sphincter. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1009–1018

  13. McLaurin C (1963) The intrinsic shphincter in prevention of gastroesophageal reflux. Lancet II: 801–805

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nauta J (1956) The closing mechanism between the esophagus and the stomach. Gastroenterologia 86: 219–224

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pera C, Suñer M, Capdevila J (1975) Anatomical demonstration of the lower esophageal sphincter: a biometrical analysis of 300 specimens. Bull Soc Int Chir 285: 34–39

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pettersson GB, Bombeck CT, Nyhus LM (1980) The lower esophageal sphincter: mechanisms of opening and closure. Surgery 88: 307–314

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pettersson GB, Bombeck CT, Nyhus LM (1980) The dynamics of lower esophageal sphincter function. Curr Surg 37: 143–145

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pettersson GB, Bombeck CT, Nyhus LM (1981) Influence of the hiatal hernia on lower esophageal sphincter function. An experimental study. Ann Surg 193: 214–220

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rinaldo JA, Levey JF, Smathers HM, Gardner LW, McGinnis KD (1971) An integrated anatomic, physiologic and cineradiologic study of the canine gastroesophageal sphincter. Digest Dis 16: 556–565

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Offprint requests to: J. Boix-Ochoa at the above address

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bardají, C., Boix-Ochoa, J. Contribution of the His angle to the gastroesophageal antireflux mechanism. Pediatr Surg Int 1, 172–176 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00180919

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00180919

Key words

Navigation