Skip to main content
Log in

Tumor growth after laparotomy or laparoscopy

A preliminary study

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated the effects of laparotomy and insufflation on tumor establishment and growth in a murine model. Twenty female mice received intradermal inoculation of a low dose of tumor cells (2×103) derived from the MC2 mouse mammary carcinoma cell line. Ten of these mice underwent laparotomy and ten received intraperitoneal insufflation with carbon dioxide gas at a pressure of 5 mmHg for 30 min. Tumor growth was followed postoperatively. By postoperative day 14, tumors had grown in zero of the ten insufflated mice and in seven of the ten laparotomy-group mice (P<0.005). By postoperative day 30, tumors had grown in one of the ten insufflated mice and in eight of the ten laparotomy-group mice (P<0.007).

Ten additional mice received a high-dose inoculum of cells (1×106) followed by either laparotomy or intraperitoneal insufflation. Upon sacrifice 12 days later, all mice had developed tumors, but the laparotomy group's tumors were almost three times as large, by mass, as tumors in the insufflated group (70.5±23.5 mg vs 25.8±9.5 mg; P<0.02).

These results suggest that laparotomy confers a permissive effect on tumor establishment and growth in a murine model not seen after peritoneal insufflation. We hypothesize that this may be a function of relative immunosuppression following laparotomy which is not present following peritoneal insufflation. These data may be important when choosing a route of access to the peritoneal cavity for cancer resection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akiyoshi T, Koba F, Arinaga S, et al. (1985) Impaired production of interleukin-2 after surgery. Clin Exp Immunol 59: 45–49

    Google Scholar 

  2. Christou NV, Mannick JA, West MA, et al. (1987) Lymphocyte-macrophage interactions in the response to surgical infections. Arch Surg 122: 239–251

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cole WH, Humphrey L (1985) Need for immunologic stimulators during immunosuppression produced by major cancer surgery. Ann Surg 202: 9–20

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eggermont AM, Steller EP, Marquet RL, Jeekel J, Sugarbaker PH (1988) Local regional promotion of tumor growth after abdominal surgery is dominant over immuno therapy with interleukin-2 and lymphokine activated killer cells. Cancer Detect Prev 12:421–429

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goshima H, Saji S, Furuta T, Taneumura H, Takao H, Kida H, Takahashi H (1989) Experimental study on preventive effects of lung metastases using LAK cells induced from various lymphocytes—special references to enhancement of lung metastasis after laparotomy stress. J Jpn Surg Soc 90: 1245–1250

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hammer JH, Nielsen HJ, Moesgaard F, Kehlet H (1992) Duration of postoperative immunosuppression assessed by repeated delayed type hypersensitivity skin tests. Eur Surg Res 24: 133–137

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hjortsø NC, Kehlet H (1986) Influence of surgery, age and serum albumin on delayed hypersensitivity. Acta Chir Scand 152: 175–179

    Google Scholar 

  8. Horgan PG, Fitzpatrick M, Couse NF, Gorey TF, Fitzpatrick JM (1992) Laparoscopy is less immunotraumatic than laparotomy. Min Inv Ther 1: 241–244

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lennard TWJ, Shenton BK, Borzotta A, Donnelly PK, White M, Gerrie LM, Proud G, Taylor RMR (1985) The influence of surgical operations on components of the human immune system. Br J Surg 72: 771–776

    Google Scholar 

  10. Neilsen HJ, Moesgaard F, Kehlmet H (1989) Ranitidine for prevention of postoperative suppression of delayed hypersensitivity. Am J Surg 157: 291–294

    Google Scholar 

  11. Neilsen HJ, Pedersen BK, Moesgaard F, Haahr PM, Kehlmet H (1989) Effect of ranitidine on improvement of postoperative suppression in natural killer cell activity and delayed hypersensitivity. Acta Chir Scand 155: 337–382

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ratajczak HV, Lange RW, Sothern RB, Hagen KL, Vescei P, Wu J, Halberg F, Thomas PT (1992) Surgical influence on murine immunity and tumor growth: relationship of body temperature and hormones with splenocytes. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 199: 432–440

    Google Scholar 

  13. Trokel MJ, Allendorf JDF, Treat MR, Whelan RL, Nowygrod R, Bessler M (1994) Inflammatory response is better preserved after laparoscopy vs laparotomy. Surg Endosc 8: 232

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vaage J, Pepin K (1985) Morphological observations during developing concomitant immunity against a C3H/He mammary tumor. Cancer Res 45: 659–666

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Allendorf, J.D.F., Bessler, M., Kayton, M.L. et al. Tumor growth after laparotomy or laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 9, 49–52 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00187885

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00187885

Key words

Navigation