Abstract
Background: To assess the feasibility of telementoring, a clinical telepresence system was developed.
Methods: Telementoring was attempted in 14 advanced and 9 basic urologic laparoscopic procedures. The remote surgeon located in a control room (>1,000 feet from operating room) supervised an inexperienced surgeon. Mentoring was accomplished with real-time video images, two-way audio communication, a robotic arm used to control the videoendoscope, and a telestrator. The patient outcome, complications, and operative time were assessed and compared to patients undergoing matched procedures in which the experienced surgeon was working side by side with the primary surgeon.
Results: The overall telementoring success rate was 95.6% (22/23 cases) with no increase in complications. Telementoring of a laparoscopic radical nephrectomy failed secondary to improper positioning of the robotic arm. Operative times compared between telementored and traditionally mentored procedures were not statistically different for basic procedures but were longer for advanced cases.
Conclusions: Telementoring of laparoscopic procedures is safe and feasible. Further clinical studies are needed prior to implementing telementoring in surgical training.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Docimo S, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR (1994) Laparoscopic orchiopexy for the palpable true undescended testicle: preliminary results. J Endourol (Abstr) 7 [Suppl 1]: S95
Editorial (1995) Telemedicine: fad or future? Lancet 345: 73–74
Green P, Satava R, Hill J, Simon I (1992) Telepresence: advanced teleoperator technology for minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc (Abstr) 6: 91
Hurteau R, Begin E, Gagner M (1994) Laparoscopic surgery assisted by a robotic cameraman: concept and experimental results. IEEE Internal Conference Proceedings 3: 2286–2289
Jordan GH, Winslow BH (1993) Laparoendoscopic upper pole partial nephrectomy with ureterectomy. J Urol 150: 940–943
Kavoussi LR, Clayman RV, Brunt ML, Soper NJ (1992) Laparoscopic ureterolysis. J Urol 147: 426–4295
Kavoussi LR, Kerbl K, Capelouto CC, McDougal EM, Clayman RV (1993) Laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal neoplasms. Urology 42: 603–609
Kavoussi LR, Peters CA (1993) Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Urol 150: 1891–1894
Kavoussi LR, Moore RG, Partin AW, Bender JS, Zenilman ME, Satava RM (1994) Telerobotic assisted laparoscopic surgery: initial laboratory and clinical experience. Urology 44: 15–19
McGee R, Tangalos EG (1994) Delivery of health care to the undeserved: potential contributions of telecommunications technology. Mayo Clin Proc 69: 1131–1136
McKernan JB, Wolfe BM, McFadyen BV Jr (1992) Laparoscopic repair of duodenal ulcers and gastroesophageal reflux. Surg Clin North Am 72: 1153–1167
Monson JR, Darzi A, Carey PD, Guillou PJ (1992) Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic assisted colectomy in an unselected group of patients. Lancet 340: 831–833
New York State Dept of Health (1992) Laparoscopic surgery. New York State Dept of Health Memorandum, Albany, Series 92-20, June 12
Parra RO, Andrus C, Boullier J (1992) Staging laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection. Comparison of results with open pelvic lymphadenectomy. J Urol 147: 875–878
Polascik TJ, Moore RG, Rosenburg MT, Kavoussi LR (1995) Comparison of laparoscopic and open retropubic urethropexy for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Urology 45: 647–651.
Sackier J, Wang Y (1994) Robotic assisted surgery: from concept to development. Surg Endosc 8: 63–66
See WA, Cooper CS, Fisher RJ (1992) Predictors of laparoscopic complications after formal training in laparoscopic surgery. JAMA 270: 2689–2692
Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons. (1991) Granting of privileges for laparoscopic general surgery. Am J Surg 161: 324–325
Soper NJ, Barteau JA, Clayman RV, Ashley SW, Dunnegan DL (1992) Comparison of early postoperative results for laparoscopic versus standard open cholecystectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 174: 114–118
Vogt DM, Curet MJ, Pitcher DE, Martin DT, Zucker KA (1995) Preliminary results of a prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic onlay versus conventional inguinal herniorrhaphy. Am J Surg 169: 84–90
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moore, R.G., Adams, J.B., Partin, A.W. et al. Telementoring of laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc 10, 107–110 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00188353
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00188353