Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse

Clinical outcome and anorectal function tests

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of laparoscopic rectopexy and its effect on anorectal function investigations.

Methods: Twelve patients with complete rectal prolapse without constipation underwent laparoscopic rectopexy. Pre- and postoperative evaluation included scoring of incontinence, anorectal manometry, and anal endosonography.

Results: No recurrences of rectal prolapse were seen (median follow-up 19 months). Continence improved in eight of nine preoperatively incontinent patients. Two patients had mild constipation after surgery. Median maximum basal pressure measured by anorectal manometry increased from 20 to 25 mmHg (p=0.005) and the rectoanal inhibitory reflex improved in seven patients (p=0.03). Rectal sensitivity did not change significantly. Endosonography showed asymmetry and thickening of the internal anal sphincter and submucosa preoperatively. After surgery the maximum internal anal sphincter thickness decreased from 3.0 mm to 2.6 mm (p=0.02).

Conclusions: Laparoscopic rectopexy improved continence in our patients. Anorectal function tests show a partial recovery of the internal anal sphincter. Laparoscopic rectopexy combines the low morbidity of minimal invasive surgery with the good outcome of abdominal rectopexy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bartram CI (1992) Anal endosonography. Ann Gastroenterol Hepatol 28: 185–189

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berman IR (1992) Sutureless laparoscopic rectopexy for procidentia: technique and implications. Dis Colon Rectum 35: 689–693

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blaker R, Senagore AJ, Luchtefeld MA (1995) Laparoscopic assisted vs. open resection. Rectopexy offers excellent results. Dis Colon Rectum 38: 199–201

    Google Scholar 

  4. Broden G, Dolk A, Holmstrom B (1988) Recovery of the internal anal sphincter following rectopexy: a possible explanation for continence improvement. Int J Colorectal Dis 3: 23–28

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burnett S, Bartram CI (1991) Endosonographic variations in the normal internal anal sphincter. Int J Colorectal Dis 6: 2–4

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cuesta MA, Borgstein PJ, De Jong D, Meijer S (1993) Laparoscopic rectopexy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3: 456–458

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cuesta MA, Meijer S, Derksen EJ, Boutkan H, Meuwissen S (1992) Anal sphincter imaging in fecal incontinence using endosonography. Dis Colon Rectum 35: 59–63

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cuschieri A, Shimi SM, Vander VG, Banting S, Wood RAB (1994) Laparoscopic prosthesis fixation rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 81: 138–139

    Google Scholar 

  9. Delemarre JBVM, Gooszen HG, Kruyt RH, Soebhag R, Geesteranus AM (1991) The effect of posterior rectopexy on fecal continence. A prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 34: 311–316

    Google Scholar 

  10. Duthie GS, Bartolo DCC (1992) Abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparison of techniques. Br J Surg 79: 107–113

    Google Scholar 

  11. Farouk R, Duthie GS, Bartolo DCC, MacGregor AB (1992) Restoration of continence following rectopexy for rectal prolapse and recovery of the internal anal sphincter electromyogram. Br J Surg 79: 439–440

    Google Scholar 

  12. Farouk R, Duthie GS, MacGregor SAB, Bartolo DCC (1994) Rectoanal inhibition and incontinence in patients with rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 81: 743–746

    Google Scholar 

  13. Felt-Bersma RJF, Klinkenberg-Knol EC, Meuwissen SGM (1990) Anorectal function investigations in incontinent and continent patients. Differences and discriminatory value. Dis Colon Rectum 33: 479–486

    Google Scholar 

  14. Felt-Bersma RJF, Van Baren R, Koorevaar M, Strijers RL, Cuesta MA (1995) Unsuspected sphincter defects shown by anal endosonography after anorectal surgery: a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 38: 249–253

    Google Scholar 

  15. Graf W, Ejerblad S, Krog M, Pahlman L, Gerdin B (1992) Delorme's operation for rectal prolapse in elderly or unfit patients. Eur J Surg 158: 555–557

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hoitsma HFW, Meijer S, Klinkenberg-Knol EC, Den Otter G (1984) The treatment of complete rectal prolapse by transabdominal posterior rectopexy. Neth J Surg 36: 73–76

    Google Scholar 

  17. Johansen OB, Wexner SD, Daniel N, Nogueras JJ, Jagelman DG (1993) Perineal rectosigmoidectomy in the elderly. Dis Colon Rectum 36: 767–772

    Google Scholar 

  18. Keighley MRB, Fielding JWL, Alexander-Williams J (1983) Results of Marlex mesh abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse in 100 consecutive patients. Br J Surg 70: 229–232

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lechaux JP, Lechaux D, Perez M (1995) Results of Delorme's procedure for rectal prolapse. Advantage of a modified technique. Dis Colon Rectum 38: 301–307

    Google Scholar 

  20. Madden MV, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, Santhanam AN, Cabot R, Speakman CTM (1992) Abdominal rectopexy for complete prolapse: prospective study evaluating changes in symptoms and anorectal function. Dis Colon Rectum 35: 48–55

    Google Scholar 

  21. McCue JL, thomson JPS (1991) Clinical and functional results of abdominal rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 78: 921–923

    Google Scholar 

  22. McKee RF, Lauder JC, Poon FW, Aitchison MA, Finlay IG (1992) A prospective randomized study of abdominal rectopexy with and without sigmoidectomy in rectal prolapse. Surg Gynecol Obstet 174: 145–148

    Google Scholar 

  23. Neilsen MB, Hauge C, Rasmussen OO, Sorensen M, Pedersen JF, Christiansen J (1992) Anal sphincter size measured by endosonography in healthy volunteers. Effect of age, sex and parity. Acta Radiol 33: 453–456

    Google Scholar 

  24. Parks AG (1975) Anorectal incontinence. Proc R Soc Med 68: 681–690

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ramanujam PS, Venkatesh KS, Fietz MJ (1994) Perineal excision of rectal procidentia in elderly high risk patients. A ten-year experience. Dis Colon Rectum 37: 1027–1030

    Google Scholar 

  26. Scaglia M, Fasth S, Hallgren T, Nordgren S, Oresland T, Hulten L (1994) Abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse: influence of surgical technique on functional outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 37: 185–189

    Google Scholar 

  27. Speakman CT, Madden MV, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA (1991) Lateral ligament division during rectopexy causes constipation but prevents recurrence: results of a prospective randomized study. Br J Surg 78: 1431–1433

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tjandra JJ, Fazio VW, Church JM, Milson JW, Oakley JR, Lavery IC (1993) Ripstein procedure is an effective treatment for rectal prolapse without constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 36: 501–507

    Google Scholar 

  29. Williams JG, Wong WD, Jensen L, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM (1991) Incontinence and rectal prolapse: a prospective manometric study. Dis Colon Rectum 34: 209–216

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Poen, A.C., de Brauw, M., Felt-Bersma, R.J.F. et al. Laparoscopic rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse. Surg Endosc 10, 904–908 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00188480

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00188480

Key words

Navigation