Skip to main content
Log in

Grip reorganization during wrist transport: the influence of an Altered aperture

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Past studies have examined the coupling of reach and grasp components during prehensile movements. Many of these studies have supported the view that these components reflect the output of two parallel, though temporally coupled, motor programs. When the grip aperture is Altered prior to the onset of prehension from its usual, normally flexed position to one of maximal finger extension, our previous work has shown that the grasp component appears to reorganize itself during the reach. This reorganization, consisting of a brief closing and reopening of the grip aperture, only slightly influenced the temporal components of the wrist transport. The present experiment continues this research theme by examining the characteristics of grip aperture reorganization through the comparison of the kinematics of prehension components during movements to two different size objects under normal and Altered grip aperture conditions. It was hypothesized that if the grip reorganization is task dependent it should be related to object size. The experiment found that in the Altered grip condition reorganization did occur, as indicated by a slight closing and reopening of the aperture without influencing the transport of the wrist. The amplitude of and the time to the observed inflection point in the aperture time course were related to object size. The velocity of grip closing for the large object showed double peaks, with the first substantially smaller than the second. Moreover, for the small object, the velocity of grip aperture closing also was double peaked, but the difference between peaks was less pronounced. These changes in grip velocity suggest that the grip reorganization is related to object size. No effect of Altered aperture was observed on the transport component. For both object sizes in the Altered condition, the final peak velocity of grip aperture was statistically significantly correlated with transport time and time to peak deceleration. In contrast, such correlations were not observed for the initial peak velocity of the grip aperture. Furthermore, time to maximum grip aperture was correlated with both time to peak wrist velocity and time peak to wrist deceleration. Thus, as the reach progressed toward the object, the grip and transport components became more interdependent. The results are consistent with the notion that, when a well-practiced, coordinated act such as prehension is confronted with an Altered grip posture at the onset of the reach, the grip can be reorganized during the transport to preserve the relative timing between them. Thus these data add to the growing awareness that not only is there temporal coupling between the reach and grasp components but that these components may be integrated by higher-order control mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arbib MA (1981) Perceptual structures and distributed motor control. In: Brooks VB (ed) Motor control. (Handbook of physiology, sect 1, The nervous system, vol 2, part 2) Williams and Wilkins, pp 1449–1480

  • Arbib MA (1985) Schemes for the temporal organization of behavior. Hum Neurobiol 4:63–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbib MA (1990) Programs, schemas, and neural networks for control of hand movements: beyond the RS framework. In: Jeannerod M (ed) Motor representation and control. (Attention and performance XIII) Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 111–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Athenes S (1992) Aspects de la coordination motrice a travers l'etude de la prehension et de la posture graphique. PhD thésis. Univerisite d'Aix-Marseille 11, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Bootsma RJ, Marteniuk RG, MacKenzie CL, Zaal FTJM (1994) The speed-accuracy trade-off in manual prehension: effects of movement amplitude, object size and object width on kinematic characteristics. Exp Brain Res 98:535–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkman C, Kuypers HGJM (1973) Cerebral control of contralateral and ipsilateral arm, hand and finger movements in the split-brain rhesus monkey. Brain 96:653–674

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Castiello U, Bennet KMB, Paulignan Y (1992a) Does the type of prehension influence of kinematics of reaching? Behav Brain Res 50:7–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Castiello U, Stelmach GE, Lieberman AN (1992b) Temporal dissociation of the prehension pattern in Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychologia 31:395–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Castiello U, Bennet KMB, Stelmach GE (1993) Reach to grasp: the natural response to perturbation of object size. Exp Brain Res 94:163–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Flash T, Henis E, Inzelberg R, Korczyn AD (1992) Timing and sequencing of human arm trajectories: normal and abnormal motor behavior. Hum Mov Sci 11:83–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentilucci M, Castielllo U, Corradini ML, Scarpa M, Rizzolati (1991) Influence of different types of grasping on the transport component of prehension movements. Neuropsychologia 29:361–378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gentilucci M, Chieffi S, Scarpa M, Castiello U (1992) Temporal coupling between transport and grasp components during prehension movements: effect of visual perturbation. Behav Brain Res 47:71–82

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger D, Gilman S, Aldridge JW (1993) Primate basal ganglia activity in a precued reaching task: preparation for movement. Exp Brain Res 95:51–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson LS, Goodale MA (1991) Factors affecting higher movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension. Exp Brain Res 86:199–208

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M (1981) Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects. In: Long J, Baddley A (eds) Attention and performance IX. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 153–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M (1984) The timing of natural prehension movements. J Mot Behav 16:235–254

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M (1992) Coordination mechanisms in prehension movements. In: Requin J, Stelmach G (eds) Tutorials in motor behavior II. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 265–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden CD (1984) Function of the basal ganglia as revealed by cognitive and motor disorders in Parkinson's disease. Can J Neurol Sci 11:129–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Martenuik RG, Leavitt JL, MacKenzie CL, Athenes S (1990) Functional relationships between grasp and transport components in a prehension task. Hum Mov Sci 9:149–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Muir RB, Lemon RN (1983) Corticospinal neurons with a special role in a precision grip. Brain Res 261:312–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller F, Stelmach GE (1992) Prehension movements in Parkinson's disease. In: Requin J, Stelmach GE (eds) Tutorials in motor behavior II. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp (307–319)

    Google Scholar 

  • Passingham R, Perry H, Wilkinson F (1978) Failure to develop a precision grip in monkeys with unilateral neocortical lesions made in infancy. Brain Res 145:410–414

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paulignan Y, MacKenzie CL, Marteniuk R, Jeannerod M (1991a) The coupling of arm and finger movements during prehension. Exp Brain Res 79:431–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulignan Y, Jeannerod M, MacKenzie C, Marteniuk R (1991b) Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. 2. The effects of changing object size. Exp Brain Res 87:407–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz AB (1994) Neuronal substrate for volitional movements. In: Bennet KMB, Castiello U (eds) Insights into the reach to grasp movement. (Advances in psychology) North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 59–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Stelmach GE, Castiello U, Jeannerod M (1994) Orienting the finger opposition space during prehension movements. J Mot Behav 26:178–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevarthen CB (1965) Functional interactions between the cerebral hemispheres in the monkey. In: Ettlinger EG (ed) Functions of the corpus callosum. Ciba Foundation London, pp 24–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmann D, Stelmach GE, Bloedel JR (1996) Grasping component alterations and limb transport. Exp Brain Res 108:486–492

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace SA, Weeks DL (1988) Temporal constraints in the control of prehensile movement. J Mot Behav 20:18–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Wing AM, Fraser C (1983) The contribution of the thumb to reaching movements. Q J Exp Psychol 35A:297–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Wing AM, Turton A, Frazier J (1986) Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. J Mot Behav 18:245–260

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saling, M., Mescheriakov, S., Molokanova, E. et al. Grip reorganization during wrist transport: the influence of an Altered aperture. Exp Brain Res 108, 493–500 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00227272

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00227272

Key words

Navigation