Skip to main content
Log in

Glafenine-associated anaphylaxis as a cause of hospital admission in the Netherlands

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In 1981 generalized anaphylaxis was registered on 166 occasions in Dutch general and academic hospitals. Clinical details of 120 of those patients revealed that in 107 anaphylaxis was either probable (n=90) or possible (n=17), whereas in 13 cases some other reaction than anaphylaxis had occurred. The series of confirmed cases contained 46 men and 61 women, with mean ages of 47 y and 48 y, respectively.

There was a complete recovery in 102 patients and two patients died. Hypotension was present in 79 cases (74%), dyspnoea in 34 cases (32%) and a skin reaction, mainly urticaria, erythema or angioedema, was mentioned in 62 cases (58%). Most cases of anaphylaxis were drug-induced (76%), the main causes being the analgesic glafenine and contrast media. Glafenine was mentioned as the cause in 36% of all admissions for drug-induced anaphylaxis. Only 3.7% of cases had been reported to the voluntary reporting scheme of the Netherlands Centre for Monitoring of Adverse Reactions to Drugs.

On the basis of reimbursement data, the risk of developing severe anaphylaxis to glafenine was estimated at 11.7–19.3-fold relative to indomethacin, and 13.4–20.2-fold relative to oral penicillins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wasserman SI, Marquardt DL (1988) Anaphylaxis. In: Allergy. Principles and practice. Middleton E, Reed CE, Ellis EF, Adkinson NF, Yunginger JW (ed) pp 1365–1376

  2. Miettinen OS (1976) Estimability and estimation in case-referent studies. Am J Epidemiol 103: 226–235

    Google Scholar 

  3. Meyboom RHB (1976) Anafylaxie na het gebruik van glafenine. Ned Tijdschr Geneesk 120: 926–927

    Google Scholar 

  4. Maesen F, Mol JM, Brombacher PJ, Bok EJ, Voorden JMJ, Van de Vijgen JH (1976) Anafylactische shock na gebruik van glafenine (Glifanan). Ned Tijdschr Geneesk 120: 926–927

    Google Scholar 

  5. Meyboom RHB (1979) Problemen met glafenine. Geneesmid-delenbull 13: 23–26

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gaultier M, Bismuth C, Efthymiou ML, Morel-Maroger L, Romion A (1972) Nouv Presse Méd 1: 3125–3128

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barral C, Faivre M (1975) Accidents anaphylactiques imputés à la glafenine. Cinq cas. Nouv Presse Méd 4: 2797–2798

    Google Scholar 

  8. Michaud JL, Doublet L (1976) Choc induit par la glafénine. Six nouveau cas. Nouv Presse Méd 5: 716

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cheymol G, Biour M, Bruneel M, Albengres E, Hamel JD (1985) Bilan d'un enquête nationale prospective sur les effects indésirables de la glafénine, de l'antrafénine et de la floctafénine. Therapie 40: 45–50

    Google Scholar 

  10. Saxon A, Beall GN, Rohr AS, Adelman DC (1978) Immediate hypersensitivity reactions to beta-lactam antibiotics. Ann Intern Med 107: 204–215

    Google Scholar 

  11. Weiss ME, Adkinson NF (1988) Immediate hypersensitivity reactions to penicillin and related antibiotics. Clin Allergy 18: 515–540

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stricker, B.H., de Groot, R.R.M. & Wilson, J.H.P. Glafenine-associated anaphylaxis as a cause of hospital admission in the Netherlands. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 40, 367–371 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00265845

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00265845

Key words

Navigation