Summary
The aim of this review is to demonstrate why the management of compliance, although not an explicit feature of the rules of Good Clinical Practice, is essential to the successful conduct of clinical trials and in correct interpretation of the results. Methods to measure compliance in randomized clinical trials are also described. The relevant literature was retrieved by a manual search of the Cumulated Index Medicus 1975–1989 and a MEDLINE computer search of publications in 1990 using the Medical Subject Headings “patient compliance” and “clinical trials”. All retrieved articles are discussed. Research into patient compliance has stagnated because of the lack of a “gold” standard of measurement. Nevertheless, management of compliance at the different stages of clinical trials is necessary; at trial design, compliance should be taken into account in sample size calculations; during the conduct of a trial, compliance should be monitored in order to safeguard the power of the study; and in interpretation of trial results, compliance data are helpful both in order to avoid erroneous conclusions and to enrich the value of the data. Compliance should be measured in all limbs of randomized trials, including the placebo limb, without breaking trial blinding. A classification of compliance behaviour into six types (complier, partial complier, overuser, erratic user, partial dropout and dropout) is proposed, based on the changes in the risk-benefit ratio produced by non-compliance. The use of deuterium oxide, low dose phenobarbitone (2 mg per day), digoxin (2,2 μg per day) and the new electronic monitoring devices are suitable methods for measurement in clinical trials.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fox W (1962) The self-administration of medicaments: a review of published work and a study of the problem. Bull Int Union Tub 32: 307–301
Steward RB, Cuff LE (1972) A review of medication errors and compliance in ambulant patients. Clin Pharmacol Ther 13: 463–468
Blackwell B (1973) Drug therapy: patient compliance. N Engl J Med 289: 249–252
Boyd JR, Covington TR, Stanaszek WF, Coussons TR (1974) Drug defaulting. Part i: determinants of compliance. Am J Hosp Pharm 31: 362–367
Boyd JR, Covington TR, Stanaszek WF, Coussons TR (1974) Drug defaulting. Part ii: analysis of non-compliance patterns. Am J Hosp Pharm 31: 485–491
Haynes RB, Taylor DW, Sackett DL (1979) Compliance in health care. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Evans L, Spelman M (1983) The problem of non-compliance with drug therapy. Drugs 25: 63–76
Epstein LH (1984) The direct effects of compliance on health outcome. Health Psychol 3: 385–393
Becker MH (1985) Patient adherence to prescribed therapies. Med Care 23: 539–555
Lüscher TF, Vetter H, Siegenthaler W, Vetter W (1985) Compliance in hypertension: facts and concepts. J Hypertens 3 [Suppl 1]: 3–9
Cameron K, Gregor F (1987) Chronic illness and compliance. J Adv Nurs 12: 671–676
Didlake RH, Dreyfus K, Kerman RH, Van Buren CT, Kahan BD (1988) Patient non-compliance: a major cause of late graft failure in cyclosporine-treated renal transplants. Transpl Proc 20 [Suppl 3]: 63–69
Kopanoff DE, Snider DE, Johnson M (1988) Recurrent tuberculosis: why do patients develop disease again? A United States Public Health Service cooperative survey. Am J Public Health 78: 30–33
Levy M, Mermelstein L, Hemo D (1982) Medical admissions due to non-compliance with drug therapy. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol 12: 600–604
Grymonpre RE, Mitenko PA, Sitar DS, Aoki FY, Montgomery PR (1988) Drug-associated hospital admissions in older medical patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 36: 1092–1098
Ghali JK, Kadakia S, Cooper S, Ferlinz J (1988) Precipitating factors leading to decompensation of heart failure. Traits among urban blacks. Arch Intern Med 148: 2013–2016
Davidsen F, Haghfelt T, Gram LF, Brøsen K (1988) Adverse drug reactions and drug non-compliance as primary causes of admission to a cardiology department. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 34: 83–86
Bruer JT (1982) Methodological rigor and citation frequency in patient compliance literature. Am J Public Health 72: 1119–1123
Caron HS (1985) Compliance: the case for objective measurement. J Hypertens 3 [Suppl 1]: 11–17
Rudd P (1979) In search for the gold standard for compliance measurement [editorial]. Arch Intern Med 139: 627–628
Goldsmith CH (1979) The effect of compliance distributions on therapeutical trials. In: Haynes RB, Taylor DW, Sackett DL (eds) Compliance in health care. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Davis MS (1966) Variations in patient compliance with doctors orders: analysis of congruence between survey responders and results of empirical observations. J Med Educ 41: 1037–1048
Gillum RF, Barsky AJ (1974) Diagnosis and management of patient non-compliance. JAMA 228: 1563–1567
Ley P (1979) Memory for medical information. Br J Soc Clin Psychol 18: 245–255
Ley P (1982) Satisfaction, compliance and communication. Br J Clin Psychol 21: 241–254
Ley P (1985) Doctor-patient communication: some quantitative estimates of the role of cognitive factors in non-compliance. J Hypertens 3 (suppl 1): 51–55
Inui TS, Carter WB (1985) Problems and prospects for health services research on provider-patient research. Med Care 23: 521–538
Haynes B, Wang E, Da Mota Gomes M (1987) A critical review of interventions of improve compliance with prescribed medications. Patient Educ Counseling 10: 155–166
Cockburn J, Redman S, Sanson-Fisher RW (1988) Compliance aiding strategies: a guide for the busy practitioner. Australian Prescr 11: 52–54
Leventhal H (1985) The role of theory in the study of adherence to treatment and doctor-patient interactions. Med Care 23: 556–563
Joyce CRB (1962) Patient co-operation and the sensitivity of clinical trials. J Chronic Dis 15: 1025–1036
Blackwel B (1972) Commentary — The drug defaulter. Clin Pharm Ther 13: 841–848
Soutter BR, Kennedy HB (1974) Patient compliance assessment in drug trials: usage and methods. Aust NZ J Med 4: 360–364
Gore SM (1981) Assessing clinical trials — trial discipline. Br Med J 283: 211–213
Dunbar JM (1982) Assessment of medication compliance. In: Haynes RB, Mattson ME, Engebretsen TO jr. Patient compliance to prescrived antihypertensive medication regimes: a report to NHLBI. Hypertension 4: 415–423
Blaszkowski TP, Insull W (1984) Proceedings of the workshop on the development of markers or use as adherence measures in clinical studies. Controlled Clin Trials 5 (Suppl 4): 451–587
Norell SE (1984) Methods in assessing drug compliance. Acta Med Scand 683 [Suppl]: 35–40
Sleator EK (1985) Measurement of compliance. Psychopharmacol Bull 21: 1089–1093
Roth H (1987) Measurement of compliance. Pat Educ Counselling 10: 107–116
Pledger GW (1988) Compliance in clinical trials: impact on design, analysis and interpretation. Epilepsy Res 2 [Suppl 1]: 125–133
Rudd P, Byyny RL, Zachary V, Loverde ME, Mithchell WD, Titus C, Marshall G (1988) Pill count measures of compliance in a drug trial: variability and suitability. Am J Hypertens 1: 309–312
Pullar T, Kumar S, Tindall H, Feely M (1989) Time to stop counting the tablets? Clin Pharmacol Ther 46: 163–168
Cramer JA, Mattson RH, Prevey ML, Scheyer RD, Quellette VL (1989) How often is medication taken as prescribed. A novel assessment technique [published erratum appears in JAMA (1989) 262: 1472]. JAMA 261: 3273–3277
Insull W (1984) Statement of the problem and pharmacological and clinical requirements for the ideal marker. Proceedings of the workshop on the development of markers or use as adherence measures in clinical studies. Controlled Clin Trials 5 (Suppl 4): 459–465
Haynes RB, Dantes R (1987) Patient compliance and the conduct and interpretation of therapeutic trials. Controlled Clin Trials 8: 12–19
Cramer JA, Collins J, Mattson RH (1988) Can categorization of patient background problems be used to determine early termination in a clinical trial? Controlled Clin Trials 9: 47–63
Palta M, McHugh R (1980) Planning the size of a cohort study in the presence of both losses to follow-up and non-compliance. J Chron Dis 33: 501–512
Lakatos E (1986) Sample size determination in clinical trials with time-depent rates of losses and non-compliance. Controlled Clin Trials 7: 189–199
Ramsay JA (1982) Participants in non-compliance research: compliant or noncompliant? Med Care 20: 615–622
Feinstein AR (1979) “Compliance bias” and the interpretation of clinical trials. In: Haynes RB, Taylor DW, Sackett DL (eds). Compliance in health care. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press
Materson BJ, Oster JR, Michael UF et al (1978) Dose response to chlorthalidone in patients with mild hypertension. Efficacy of a lower dose. Clin Pharmacol Ther 24: 192–198
Nimran A, Jover B (1982) Maintainance of the antihypertensive efficacy of captopril despite consistant reduction in daily dosage. Br J Clin Pharmacol 14 (Suppl 2): 81S-85S
Urquhart J, Chevalley C (1988) Impact of unrecognized dosing errors on the cost and the effectiveness of pharmaceuticals. Drug Inform J 22: 363–378
The Lipid Research Clinic's Coronary Primary Prevention Trial results (1984) I. Reduction in the incidence of coronary heart disease. II. The relationship of reduction in incidence of coronary heart disease to cholesterol lowering. JAMA 251: 351–374
Efron B, Feldman D (1989) Compliance as an explanatory variable in clinical trials. Technical report No 129, Stanford University, Stanford
Brittain E, Wittes J (1989) Factorial design in clinical trials: the effects of non-compliance and subadditivity. Stat Med 8: 161–171
Drug Information Association (1989) The impact of partial compliance in clinical trials. Philadelphia Workshop, Audiocassettes available from Audio Transcripts Ltd, Alexandria VA, USA
Lasagna L (1989) Scientific and political components of regulatory decision making: the United States experience. In: Horrisberger B, Dinkel (eds). The perception and management of drug safety risks. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp 121–127
Gibbs S, Waters WE, George CF (1989) The benefits of prescription information leaflets (1) Br J Clin Pharmacol 27: 723–739. (2) Br J Clin Pharmacol 28: 345–351
Morris L (1989) Global assessment of the patient package insert. In: Bogaert MG, Vander Stichele R, Kaufman JM, Lefebvre R (eds). Patient package insert as a source of written drug information. Elsevier. Amsterdam
Vander Stichele R (1989) Patients package inserts: a review of the literature. In: Bogaert MG, Vander Stichele R, Kaufman JM, Lefebvre R (eds). Patient package insert as a source of written drug information. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Dirks JF, Kinsman RA (1982) Nondichotomous patterns of medication usage: the yes-no fallacy. Clin Pharmacol Ther 31: 413–417
Feinstein AR (1987) Clinimetrics. Yale University Press
Maickel RP (1984) Chemical analysis of marker substances. Proceedings of the workshop on the development of markers or use as adherence measures in clinical studies. Controlled Clin Trials 5 (Suppl 4): 556–567
Silvers A, Russel ML, Insull W (1984) The statistical analysis of adherence data obtained from markers. Proceedings of the workshop on the development of markers or use as adherence measures in clinical studies. Controlled Clin Trials 5 (Suppl 4): 544–555
Levine RJ (1980) Ethical considerations in the development and application of compliance strategies for the treatment of hypertension. In: Haynes RB, Mattson ME, Engebretson TO (eds). Patient compliance to prescribed antihypertensive medication regimens: a report to the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. (NIH-publication 81-2102) US Government Printing Office
Russel ML (1984) Behavioral aspects of the use of medical markers in clinical trials. Proceedings of the workshop on the development of markers or use as adherence measures in clinical studies. Controlled Clin Trials 5 (Suppl 4): 526–534
Park LC, Lipman RS (1964) A comparison of parental dose deviations reports with pill counts. Psychopharmacologia (1964) 6: 299–302
Wilcox DR, Gillan R, Hare EH (1965) Do psychiatric outpatients take their drugs? Brit Med J 2: 790–792
Porter AMW (1969) Drug defaulting in general practice. Br Med J 1: 218–222
Leirer VO, Morrow DG, Pariante GM, Sheikh JI (1988) Elders' non-adherence, its assessment and computer assisted instruction for medication recall training. J Am Geriatric Soc 36: 877–884
Feinstein AR, Wood HR, Epstein JA, Taranta A, Simpson R, Tursky E (1959) A controlled study of three methods of prophylaxis against streptococcal infection in a population of rheumatic children. N Eng J Med 260: 697–702
Chaves AD (1960) Results of the PAS Urine test (Phenistix). Am Rev Resp Dis 81: 111–112
Bergman AB, Werner RJ (1963) Failure of children to receive penicillin by mouth. N Engl J Med 268: 1334–1338
Preston DF, Miller FL (1964) The tuberculosis outpatients' defection from therapy. Am J Med Sci 247: 21–25
Gordis L, Marcovitz M, Lilienfeld AM (1969) The inaccuracy in using interviews to estimate patient reliability in taking medications at home. Med Care 7: 49–54
Rickels K, Briscoe E (1970) Assessment of dosage deviation in outpatient drug research. J Clin Pharmacol 10: 152–160
Sheiner L, Rosenberg B, Marathe V, Peck C (1974) Differences in serum digoxin concentrations between out-patients and in-patients: An effect of compliance? Clin Pharmacol Ther 15: 239–246
Gordis L (1979) Conceptual and methodologic problems in measuring patient compliance. In: Haynes RB, Taylor DW, Sackett DL (eds). Compliance in health care. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press
Roth HP, Caron HS (1978) Accuracy of doctor's estimates and patients' statements on adherence to a drug regimen. Clin Pharmacol Ther 23: 361–370
Norell SE (1981) Accuracy of patient interviews and estimates by clinical staff in determining medication compliance. Soc Sci Med 15 E: 57–61
Kass MA, Gordon M, Meltzer DW (1986) Can ophthalmologists correctly identify patients defaulting from pilocarpine treatment. Am J Ophthal 101: 515–523
Mattson ME, Friedman LM (1984) Issues in medication adherence assessment in clinical trials of the national Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. Proceedings of the workshop on the development of markers or use as adherence measures in clinical studies. Controlled Clin Trials 5 (Suppl 4): 488–496
Bussey HI, Hawkins DW, Gaspard JJ, Walsh RA (1988) A comparative trial of digoxin and digitoxin in the treatment of congestive heart failure. Pharmacotherapy 8: 235–240
Inui TS, Carter WB, Recoraro RE, Pearlman RA, Dohan JJ (1980) Variations in patient compliance with common long-term drugs. Med Care 18: 986–993
Enlund H, Tuomilehto J, Turakka H (1981) Patient report validated against prescription records for measuring use of and compliance with antihypertensive drugs. Acta Med Scand 209: 271–275
Steiner JF, Koepsell TD, Fihn SD, Inui TS (1988) A general method of compliance assessment using centralized pharmacy records. Med Care 26: 814–823
Roth HP, Caron HS, Hsi BP (1970) Measuring intake of a prescribed medication. A bottle count and a tracer technique compared. Clin Pharmacol Ther 11: 228–237
Mäenpää H, Manninen V, Heinonen OP (1987) Comparison of the digoxin marker with capsule counting and compliance questionnaire methods for measuring compliance to medication in a clinical trial. Eur Heart J 8 (Suppl 1): 39–43
Urquhart J (1989) Non-compliance: the ultimate absorption barrier. In: Prescott LF, Nimmo WS (eds). Novel drug delivery and its therapeutic applications. John Wiley & Sons, New York
Rudd P, Byyny RL, Zachary V, LoVerde ME, Titus C, Mitchell WD, Marshall G (1989) The natural history of medication compliance in a drug trial: limitations of pill counts. Clin Pharmacol Ther 46: 169–176
Burris JF, Mroczek WJ (1990) Pill hoarding and hypercompliance [letter]. Clin Pharmacol Ther 47: 547
Young LM, Haakenson CM, Lee KK (1984) Riboflavine use as a drug marker in Veterans Administration Cooperative studies. Proceedings of the workshop on the development of markers or use as adherence measures in clinical studies. Controlled Clin Trials 5 (Suppl 4): 497–504
Roth JK (1980) The pill bottle dessiccant and non-compliance [letter]. JAMA 244: 2263
Thompson WL (1984) Clinical Pharmacology of a marker of patient compulsiveness. Proceedings of the workshop on the development of markers or use as adherence measures in clinical studies. Controlled Clin Trials 5 (Suppl 4): 522–525
Dunbar J (1984) Adherence measures and their utility. Proceedings of the workshop on the development of markers or use as adherence measures in clinical studies. Controlled Clin Trials 5 (Suppl 4): 515–521
Wolen RL, Crabtree RE, Carmichael RH (1984) Tracer microspheres as compliance markers in clinical research. Proceedings of the workshop on the development of markers or use as adherence measures in clinical studies. Controlled Clin Trials 5 (Suppl 4): 540–543
Fales HM (1984) Alternative adherence marker schemes. Proceedings of the workshop on the development of markers or use as adherence measures in clinical studies. Controlled Clin Trials 5 (Suppl 4): 476–578
Rodewald LE, Maiman LA, Faye HR, Borch RF, Forbes GB (1989) Deuterium oxide as a tracer for measurement of compliance in pediatric clinical drug trials. J Pediatr 114: 885–891
Klein PD (1984) Stable isotopic abundances as reflections of ingestion practices. Proceedings of the workshop on the development of markers or use as adherence measures in clinical studies. Controlled Clin Trials 5 (Suppl 4): 568–572
Schwarcz HP (1984) Use of stable isotopes to determine compliance. Proceedings of the workshop on the development of markers or use as adherence measures in clinical studies. Controlled Clin Trials 5 (Suppl 4): 573–587
Geisler A, Andersen E, Vedso S (1968) Depressive patienters medvirken ved medicamentel behandling. Ugerskr Laeg 130: 1803–1806
Caron HS, Roth HP (1968) Patients' cooperation with a medical regimen. Difficulties in identifying the noncooperator. JAMA 203: 922–926
Thompson RH, Stowers JM (1971) The use of a drug marker in a clinical trial. Scot Med J 16: 259–260
Epstein LH, Masek BJ (1978) Behavioral control of medicine compliance. J Appl Behav Anal 11: 1–9
Deutsche KW, Jordahl C, Hobby GL (1960) Clinical usefulness of riboflavin-tagged isoniazid for self-medication in tuberculous patients. Am Rev Resp Dis 82: 1–10
Jones IH (1967) Riboflavine as an indicator of drug taking behaviour. Med J Aust 54: 202–204
Jay S, et al. (1984) Riboflavine, self-report and serum norethindrone. Comparison of their use as indicators of adolescent compliance with oral contraceptives. Am J Dis Child 138: 70–73
Kraus JA (1985) The applicability of riboflavine as a marker for patient compliance. Pharmacol Weekbl 120: 9
Dubbert PM, et al. (1985) Riboflavine as a tracer of medication compliance. J Behav Med 8: 287–299
Babiker IE, Cooke PR, Gillet MG (1989) How useful is riboflavine as a tracer of medication compliance? J Behav Med 12: 25–38
Feely M, Cooke J, Price D, Singleton S, Mehta A, Bradford L, Calvert R (1987) Low-dose phenobarbitone as an indicator of compliance with drug therapy. Br J Clin Pharmacol 24: 77–83
Pullar T, Birtwell AJ, Wiles PG, Hay A, Feely MP (1988) Use of a pharmacologic indicator to compare compliance with tablets prescribed to be taken once, twice or three times daily. Clin Pharmacol Ther 44: 540–545
Pullar T, Peaker S, Martin MFR, Bird HA, Feely MP (1988) The use of a pharmacological indicator to investigate compliance in patients with a poor response to antirheumatic therapy. Brit J Rheumatol 27: 381–384
Penn ND, Peaker S, Griffiths AP, Feely M, Tindall H (1988) Use of a pharmacological indicator to monitor compliance with thyroxine. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 35: 327–329
Feely M, Price D, Bodansky HJ, Tindall H (1989) The use of pharmacological indicator to assess compliance with drug therapy in patients with poorly controlled type II diabetes. Br J Clin Pharmacol 27: 101P-102P
Kumar S, Haigh JRM, Rhodes LE, Peaker S, Davies JA, Roberts BE, Feely MP (1989) Poor compliance is a mayor factor in unstable outpatient control of anticoagulant therapy. Thrombosis Haemostasis 62: 729–732
Mäenpää H, Javela K, Pikkarainen J, Mälkönen M, Heinonen OP, Maninnen V (1987) Minimal doses of digoxin: A new marker for compliance to medication. Eur Heart J 8 (Suppl 1): 31–37
Mäenpää H, Manninen V, Heinonen OP (1989) Compliance with medication. Internal Medicine for the specialist (sept): 55–64
Moulding T (1962) Proposal for a time-recording pill dispenser as a method for studying and supervising the self-administration of drugs. Am Rev Respir Dis 48: 32–37
Moulding TS (1974) Self-administration of isoniazid and thiacetazone studied by the medication monitor. Chest 65: 234–235
Moulding TS (1979) The unrealized potential of the medication monitor. Clin Pharmacol Ther 25: 131–136
Yee RD, Hahn PM, Christensen RE (1974) Medication monitor for ophthalmology. Am J Ophtal 78: 774–778
Norell SE, Granström PA, Wassèn R (1980) A medication monitor and fluorescein technique designed to study medication behaviour. Acta Ophthal 58: 459–467
Kass MA, Meltzer D, Gordon M, Cooper D, Goldberg J (1986) Compliance with topical pilocarpine treatment. Am J Ophthal 101: 515–523
Kass MA, Gordon M, Morley RE, Meltzer DW, Goldberg JJ (1987) Compliance with topical timoptol treatment. Am J Ophthal 103: 188–193
Eisen SA, Hanpeter JA, Kreuger LW, Gard M (1987) Monitoring medication compliance: description of a new device. J Compliance Health Care 2: 131–142
Cheung R, Sullens CM, Seal D, Dickins J, Nicholson PW, Deshmukh AA, Denham MJ, Dobbs SM (1988) The paradox of using a 7 day antibacterial course to treat urinary tract infections in the community. Br J Clin Pharmacol 26: 391–398
Averbuch M, Weintraub M, Pollock DJ (1988) Compliance monitoring in clinical trials: the MEMS device [abstract]. Clin Pharmacol Ther 43: 185
Rudd P, Marshall G (1987) Resolving problems of measuring compliance with medication monitors. J Compliance Health Care 2: 23–25
First International Symposium on compliance monitoring. Heidelberg, West-Germany. June 6, 1988. Unpublished proceedings. Available from Aprex Corporation, Fremont, California, USA
Averbuch M, Weintraub M, Byrne L, LeHalpere A, Rubio A (1989) Electronic compliance monitoring in a phase I clinical trial [abstract]. Clin Pharmacol Ther 45: 153
Rudd P, Ahmed S (1989) Pill count vs electronic monitor in a drug trial [abstract]. Clin Pharmacol Ther 45: 159
Engström FW, Urquhart J (1989) Electronic monitoring of medication compliance in depressed outpatients [abstract]. Clin Pharmacol Ther 45: 159
Kruse W, Schlierf G, Weber E (1989) Dynamically compliance monitoring — its utility for the interpretation of drug trials [abstract]. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 36 (Suppl): A289
Rudd J, Ahmed S, Zachary V, Barton C (1989) Reinterpreting clinical drug trial results with an electronic monitor. Clin Res 37: 801A
Kruse W, Eggert W, Rampmaier J, Runnebaum B, Weber E (1990) Compliance with shortterm high-dose ethinyl oestradiol in young patients with primary infertility. New insights from the use of electronic devices. Agents Actions [Suppl]: 105–115
Byrne L, Averbuch M, Rubio A, Weintraub M (1990) Compliance (CMPL) measures via medication event monitoring systems (MEMS) as an adjunct in interpreting pharmacokinetic data [abstract]. Clin Pharmacol Ther 47: 152
Kruse W, Schlierf G (1990) Monitoring compliance in clinical trials [letter]. Lancet 335: 803
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vander Stichele, R. Measurement of patient compliance and the interpretation of randomized clinical trials. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 41, 27–35 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00280102
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00280102