Skip to main content
Log in

From sex differences to gender role beliefs: Exploring effects on six dimensions of religiosity

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Regardless of the particular dimension of religiosity under consideration, women are generally found to be more religious than men. To date, empirical data has not been used to explore the importance of gender role ideology in explaining these differences. Using the 1988 Akron Area Survey, the effects of sex differences and gender role beliefs on six dimensions of religiosity are explored. The major findings include the following: (1) sex differences in religiosity are not supported for most dimensions of religiosity when other demographic variables are considered; (2) gender role ideology, while not sex related, does improve the explanation of variance in most dimensions of religiosity; and (3) sex is a predictor of the closeness of an individual's relationships to God, while gender role ideology is not. We suggest that stereotypes about women being more religious are misleading and that gender role ideology has an important effect on religiosity. However, sex is more indicative of the level of religious intimacy, measured by perceived closeness to God. We discuss the implications of this finding for changes in family structure and relationships between men and women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, M. (1983). Women, feminism, and the craft. In L. Richardson & V. Taylor (Eds.), Feminist frontiers, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. L. (1988). Thinking about women: Sociological perspectives on sex and gender. New York: Macmillan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M. & Beit-Hallahmi, B. (1975). The social psychology of religion. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babbie, E. (1986). The practice of social research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson, D. C., & Ventis, W. (1982). The religious experience: A social psychological perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalfant, H. P., Beckley, R. E., & Palmer, C. (1987). Religion in contemporary society. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow, N. (1974). Family structure and feminine personality. In M. Z. Rosaldo & L. Lamphere (Eds.), Woman, culture and society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christ, G., & Plaskow, J. (1979). Womanspirit rising: A feminist reader in religion. NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vaus, D., & McAllister, I. (1987). Gender differences in religion: A test of the structural location theory. American Sociological Review, 52, 472–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glock, C. Y., Ringer, B. B., & Bobbie, E. R. (1967). To comfort and to challenge: A dilemma of the contemporary church. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurin, P. (1985). Women's gender consciousness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 143–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargrove, B. (1989). The sociology of religion: Classical and contemporary approaches. Arlington Heights: Harlan Davidson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. L. (1989, October). Religious experiences among men and women: A gender perspective on mystical revelation. Paper presented at the Society for the Scientific Study of Religion annual meeting, Salt Lake City, UT.

  • Johnstone, R. L. (1988). Religion in society: A sociology of religion (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazerwitz, B. (1961). Some factors associated with variations in church attendance. Social Forces, 39, 301–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, L. L. (1990). Gender roles: A sociological perspective. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBroom, W. H. (1984). Changes in sex-role orientations: A five-year longitudinal comparison. Sex Roles, 11, 583–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, M. B. (1987). Religion: The social context. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. (1977). Men's power with women, other men and society. In D. V. Hiller & R. A. Sheets (Eds.), Women and Men: The consequences of power. Cincinnati: University of Cincinnati Women's Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poloma, M. M., & Pendleton, B. F. (1990). Exploring types of prayer and the quality of life. Review of Religious Research, 31, 46–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poloma, M., & Pendleton, B. F. (1991). Exploring neglected dimensions of religion in quality of life research. New York: The Edwin Mellen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzetti, C. M., & Curran, D. J. (1989). Women, men, and society: The sociology of gender. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, L. (1988). The dynamics of sex and gender: A sociological perspective. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K. (1990). Religion in sociological perspective (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, L. (1983). Intimate strangers. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapiro, V. (1990). Women in American society. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sattel, J. W. (1989). Men, inexpressiveness and power. In L. Richardson & V. Taylor (Eds.), Feminist Frontiers II. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, M. (1976). The paradixe papers. London: Quartel Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, A. (1985). Reciprocal influences of family and religion in a changing world. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 381–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, A., Alwin, D. F., & Camburn, D. (1983). Sex Role Attitudes and Attitude Change. American Sociological Review, 48, 211–227.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feltey, K.M., Poloma, M.M. From sex differences to gender role beliefs: Exploring effects on six dimensions of religiosity. Sex Roles 25, 181–193 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289853

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289853

Keywords

Navigation