Skip to main content
Log in

Enhanced precision with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Repeat spine and femur measurements (5 per case) were done on 19 subjects with the DPX-L densitometer operating at 3 mA giving a radiation flux fourfold higher than the earlier DPX model. The precision for spine bone mineral density (BMD) was about 0.55% (L2–L4) and 0.48% (L1–L4) for 2-minute scans (2.4 mrem). The precision was only slightly lower (0.4–0.5%) for 4-minute scans (5 mrem) in a subset of 11 subjects. There was a slight precision advantage for the larger L1–L4 area compared with L2–L4 for 2-minute scans, but no advantage for 4-minute scans. The precision for femoral neck BMD was 1.00 and 0.85% for 2- and 4-minute scans, respectively, with proper positioning. The corresponding values for the Ward's triangle region of the femur were 2.6 and 1.5%. The precision of spine scans was influenced chiefly by variable region location. The precision of femur scans was affected by both patient positioning and location of the region. The 4-minute scans minimized the number of operator changes necessary for analysis. Precision errors can be reduced by up to 50% with utilization of the higher flux, but this does not obviate the need for care in patient positioning and scan analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sartoris DJ, Resnick D (1989) Dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry for bone densitometry: current status and perspective. AJR 152:241–246

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mazess RB (1990) Bone densitometry of the axial skeleton. Orthop Clin North Am 21(1):51–63

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shipp CC, Berger PS, Deehr MS, Dawson-Hughes B (1988) Precision of dual-photon absorptiometry. Calcif Tissue Int 42:287–292

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wahner HW, Dunn ML, Brown ML, Hauser MF, Morin R (1988) Comparison of quantitative digital radiography (QDR) and dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) for bone mineral measurements of the 1-spine. In: Dequeker J, Geusens P, Wahner H (eds) Bone mineral measurement by photon absorptiometry. Leuven University Press, Leuven, Belgium, pp 419–426

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mazess RB, Collick B, Trempe J, Barden HS, Hanson JA (1989) Performance evaluation of a dual-energy x-ray bone densitometer. Calcif Tissue Int 44:228–232

    Google Scholar 

  6. McClung M, Roberts L (1989) Comparison of precision performance with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) instruments. Presented at the 7th Intl Workshop on Bone Densitometry, Rancho Mirage, California

  7. Johnson J, Dawson-Hughes B (1991) Precision and stability of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry measurements. Calcif Tissue Int 49:174–178

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lilley J, Walters BG, Heath DA, Drolc Z (1991) In vivo and in vitro precision for bone density measured by dual-energy x-ray absorption. Osteoporosis Int 1:141–146

    Google Scholar 

  9. Blake GM, Tong CM, Fogelman I (1991) Intersite comparison of the Hologic QDR-1000 dual energy x-ray bone densitometer. Br J Radiol 64:440–446

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kelly TL, Slovik DM, Schoenfeld DA, Neer RM (1988) Quantitative digital radiography versus dual photon absorptiometry of the lumbar spine. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 67:839–844

    Google Scholar 

  11. Orwoll ES, Oviatt SK, the Nafarelin/Bone Study Group. Longitudinal precision of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in a multicenter study. J Bone Miner Res 6:191–197

  12. Sorenson JA (1991) Relationship between patient exposure and measurement precision in dual-photon absorptiometry of the spine. Phys Med Biol 36:169–176

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wilson CR, Fogelman I, Blake GM, Rodin A (1991) The effect of positioning on dual energy x-ray bone densitometry of the proximal femur. Bone Miner 13:69–76

    Google Scholar 

  14. Verheij LF, Blokland JAK, Papapoulos SE, Bijvoet OLM, Pauwels EKJ (1991) Automated comparison of dual-photon absorptiometric studies of the lumber spine. J Bone Miner Res 6:575–581

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reid DM, Lanham SA, McDonald AG, Avenell A, Fenner JAK, Boyle IT, Pye D, Nuki G (1990) Speed and comparability of 3 dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer (DXA) models. In: Christiansen C, Overgaard K (ed) Osteoporosis. Osteopress APS, Copenhagen, pp 575–577

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mazess, R., Chesnut, C.H., McClung, M. et al. Enhanced precision with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Calcif Tissue Int 51, 14–17 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00296209

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00296209

Key words

Navigation