Abstract
Ultrasonic assessment is a new approach to assess both quality and density. Two ultrasonic parameters are measured on the os calcis: the attenuation or broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and the velocity or speed of sound (SOS). The interunit variations in vitro and in vivo of an ultrasound instrument, the Lunar AchillesR system, used in a French multicenter study named EPIDOS, were calculated and the stability of these intruments over a 12-month period was evaluated. A third parameter called “stiffness index”, calculated from the SOS and BUA, was also used in this study. The average CV in vitro for the BUA and SOS was 0.92% and 0.12%, respectively, and the average CV in vivo for the BUA, the SOS, and the stiffness index was 1.83%, 0.23%, and 1.9%, respectively. The interunit (or inter-machines) variations were calculated by a one-way analysis of variance. We detected small but significant measurement differences among centers on a phantom for both SOS (maximum significant difference 0.4%) and stiffness (maximum significant difference 3.5%) but not for BUA. Similar diffrences were found in vivo. The precision over 12 months of the interunit variations in vitro was evaluated by measuring a single phantom traveling from one center to another several times. The range of the CV for the BUA (1.54–0.51%), for the SOS (0.25–0.14%), and for the stiffness index (2.26–1.10%) are explained in part by technical failures. The variation among the five Achilles was estimated by the combined CV which was 1.42% for the BUA, 0.32% for the SOS, and 2.33% for the stiffness index. In conclusion, our findings indicate that equipment from one manufacturer appears to be consistent between machines for the BUA, but not completely for the SOS. The results for this stiffness index are necessarily influenced by both SOS and BUA. The shortterm and long-term interunit precision is good, both in vitro and in vivo. Such results provide increased confidence in multicenter clinical trials where ultrasonic data are pooled.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Langton CM, Palmer SB, Porter RW (1984) The measurement of broadband ultrasonic attenuation in cancellous bone. Eng Med 13:89–91
Hans D, Schott AM, Meunier PJ (1993) Ultrasound assessment of bone: a review, Eur J Med 2(3):157–163
Kaufman JJ, Einhorn TA (1993) Perspective: ultrasound assessment of bone. J Bone Minor Res 8:517–525
Schott AM, Hans D, Sornay-Rendu E, Delmas PD, Meunier PJ (1993) Ultrasound measurements on os calcis: precision and age-related changes in a normal female population. Osteoporosis Int 3:249–254
Mautalen C, Gonzales D, Circosta AM (1993) Ultrasonic assessment of bone in normal and Osteoporotic women. 4th Int Symp on Osteoporosis, Hong-Kong
Blake GM (1993) Comparative performance of commercial ultrasound scanners: ultrasonic assessment of bone III: Stratford upon Avon.
Baran DT, Kelly AM, Karellas A, Gionet M et al. (1988) Ultrasound attenuation of the os calcis in women with osteoporosis and hip fracture. Calcif Tissue Int 43:138–142
Lees B, Stevenson JC (1993) Preliminary evaluation of new ultrasound bone densitometer. Calcif Tissue Int 53:149–152
Massie A, Reid DM, Porter RW (1993) Screening for osteoporosis: comparison between dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and broadband ultrasound attenuation in 1000 perimenopausal women. Osteoporosis Int 3:107–110
Herd RJM, Ramalingam T, Miller CG, Ryan PJ, Fogelman I (1993). Measurement of postmenopausal bone loss with a new contact ultrasound system. Calcif Tissue Int 53:153–157
Young H, Howey S, Purdie DW (1993) Broadband ultrasound attenuation compared with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in screening for postmenopausal low bone density. Osteoporosis Int 3:160–164
Orwoll ES, Oviatt SK, Nafarelin/Bone Study Group (1991) Longitudinal precision of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in a multicenter study. J Bone Miner Res 6, 2:191–197
Rencken ML, Murano R, Drinkwater BL, Chesnut III CH (1991) In vitro comparability of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) bone densitometers. Calcif Tissue Int 48:245–248
Trevisan C, Gandolini GG, Sibilla P, Penotti M, Caraceni MP, Ortolanie S (1992) Bone mass measurement by DXA: influence of analysis procedures and interunit variation. J Bone Miner Res 7,12:1373–1381
Orwoll ES, Oviatt SK, Biddle J (1993) Precision of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: development of quality control rules and their application in longitudinal studies. J Bone Miner Res 8,6: 693–699
Mazess RB, Hanson JA, Bonnick SL (1991) Ultrasound measurement of the os calcis. Br Bone Tooth Soc
Wells PNT (1977) Biomechanical ultrasonics. Academic Press, New York
Kotzki PO, Buyck D, Hans D, et al. (1994) Influence of fat on ultrasound measurements of the Os calcis. Calcif Tissue Int 54:91–95
Damilakis JE, Dretakis E, Gourtsoyiannis NC (1992) Ultrasound attenuation of the calcaneus in the female population: normative data. Calcif Tissue Int 51:180–183
Truscott JG, Simpson M, Stewart SP, et al. (1992) Bone ultrasonic attenuation in women: reproducibility, normal variation and comparison with absorptiometry. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 1:29–36
Brandenburger G, Waud K, Baran D (1992) Reproducibility of uncorrected velocity of sound does not indicate true precision. J Bone Miner Res 7 (suppl):368
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hans, D., Schott, A.M., Chapuy, M.C. et al. Ultrasound measurements on the os calcis in a prospective multicenter study. Calcif Tissue Int 55, 94–99 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00297182
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00297182