Skip to main content
Log in

Drug use in pregnancy: A comparative appraisal of data collecting methods

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We have compared the reliability of the information about drug therapy and pregnancy retrieved by interviewing patients with that distilled from pharmacy records. In the initial phase of each interview we used the internationally accepted open-ended technique, and extended this with an indication-oriented set of questions and then a set of specific drug-oriented questions. These data were then compared with those from pharmacy records on dispensing for the same patients during their pregnancy.

The results suggest that if drug consumption during pregnancy is evaluated by interview, one should not restrict oneself to open-ended questions but should include indication-oriented and, when appropriate, drug-oriented questions. Such specific questions offer the opportunity of detecting the use of over-the-counter medication and of constructing drug use/complaint profiles. By contrast, pharmacy records will give better information in case of long recall periods and in patients with multiple and/or repeated drug use. Investigators should use the complementary elements of both techniques where appropriate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Forfar JO, Nelson MM (1973) Epidemiology of drugs taken by pregnant women: drugs that may effect the fetus adversely. Clin Pharmacol Ther 14: 632–642

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hill RM (1973) Drugs ingested by pregnant women. Clin Pharmacol Ther 14: 632–642

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boethius G, Wiman F (1977) Recording of drug prescriptions in the country of Jämtland, Sweden. Drug exposure of pregnant women in relation to course and outcome of pregnancy. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 12: 37–43

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brocklebank JC, Ray WA, Federspiel CF, Schaffner W (1978) Drug prescribing during pregnancy: a controlled study of Tennessee Medicaid recipients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 132: 235–244

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bodendorfer TW, Briggs GG, Gunning JE (1979) Obtaining drug exposure histories during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 135: 490–494

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eskes TKAB, Nijdam WS, Buys MJRH, van Rossum JM (1985) Prospective study of the use of medication during pregnancy in the Netherlands. In: Drug therapy during pregnancy. Butter-worth, London, pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  7. Piper JM, Baum C, Kennedy DL (1987) Prescription drug use before and during pregnancy in a Medicaid population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 157: 148–157

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rubin PC, Craig GF, Gavin K, Summer D (1986) Prospective survey of use of therapeutic drugs, alcohol an cigarettes during pregnancy. Br Med J 292: 81–83

    Google Scholar 

  9. De Jong-van den Berg LTW, van den Berg PB, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM, Dukes MNG, Wesseling H (1991) Investigating drug use in pregnancy. Methodological problems and perspectives. Pharm Weekbl 13: 32–38

    Google Scholar 

  10. Collaborative Group on Drug Use in Pregnancy (1990) Drug use in pregnancy: a preliminary report of the International Cooperative drug utilization study. Pharm Weekbl [Sci] 12: 75–78

    Google Scholar 

  11. Anonymous (1988) Nordic Statistics on Medicines 1984–1986. II. Nordic drug index with classification and defined daily doses. Nordic Counsel on Medicines, Uppsala

  12. Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Education Psychol Measurement 20: 37–46

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zegers FE (1989) Het meten van overeenstemming. Ned Tijdschr Psychol 44: 145–156

    Google Scholar 

  14. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (1986) Mndstat bevolk 11: 26

    Google Scholar 

  15. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (1988) Mndstat bevolk 9: 24

    Google Scholar 

  16. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (1989) Mndber gezondheid 1: 7

    Google Scholar 

  17. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (1987) Kunstverlossingen in Nederland, 1970–1985. Mndber gezondheid 4: 22–29

    Google Scholar 

  18. Harlow S, Linet MS (1989) Agreement between questionnaire data and medical records: the evidence for accuracy of recall. Am J Epidemiol 129: 233–248

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bonati M, Bortolus R, Marchetti F, Romero M, Tognoni G ((1990) Drug use in pregnancy: an overview of epidemiological (drug utilization) studies. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 38: 325–328

    Google Scholar 

  20. Klemetti A, Saxen L ((1967) Prospective versus retrospective approach in the search for environmental causes of malformations. Am J Public Health 57: 2071–2075

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hewson D, Bennett A (1987) Childbirth research data: medical records or women's reports? Am J Epidemiol 125: 484–491

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mitchell AA, Cottler LB, Shapiro S (1986) Effect of questionnaire design on recall of drug exposure in pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol 123: 670–676

    Google Scholar 

  23. EUROCAT (1990) Recording of drugs taken during pregnancy. Newsletter, March 4(1)

  24. Payer (1988) Medicine and Culture. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Van den Broek PA, Petri H, Dorant E, (1991) Comparison of questionnaire information and pharmacy data on drug use. Pharm Weekbl [Sci] 13: 91–96

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cottler LB, Robins LN (1985) The effect of questionnaire design on reported prevalence of psychoactive medications. In: Harris LS (ed) NIDA Research Monograph. Problems of drug dependence, 1984. DHSS publication no. (ADM 55-1393), Washington DC

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Jong-van den Berg, L.T.W., Waardenburg, C.M., Haaijer-Ruskamp, F.M. et al. Drug use in pregnancy: A comparative appraisal of data collecting methods. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 45, 9–14 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00315343

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00315343

Key words

Navigation