Skip to main content
Log in

Summary

The purpose of this study was to determine whether adult women who are in a state of high physical fitness are in a good state biologically, in terms of biological and physical fitness ages as estimated by statistical means. The subjects were 65 healthy Japanese women (aged 20–64 years). Biological and physical fitness ages were estimated from the data for 18 physiological function tests and 5 physical fitness tests, respectively, by a principal component model. The correlation coefficient between biological and physical fitness ages was 0.70 (P<0.01), which was generally regarded as a high correlation. Therefore, those who were in a state of high physical fitness were considered to be in good biological condition. This result is in good agreement with the results (r=0.72) from adult men, on whom we reported previously. A statistical analysis to ascertain the relative importance of each contributory variable associated with the variance in biological age suggested that routine clinical evaluation of blood pressure and lipid metabolism might play an important role in determining not only the presence and severity of vascular disease but also the rate of biological aging in women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderberg MR (1973) Cluster analysis for applications. Academic Press, New York, pp 26–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Astrand PO (1956) Human physical fitness with special reference to sex and age. Physiol Rev 36:307–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourliére F (1978) Ecology of human senescence. In: Brocklehurst JC (ed) Textbook of geriatric medicine and gerontology. Churchill Livingstone, London, pp 71–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Comfort A (1969) Test-battery to measure ageing-rate in man. Lancet 27:1411–1415

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubina TL, Mints A Ya, Zhuk EV (1984) Biological age and its estimation. II. Introduction of a correction to the multiple regression model of biological age and assessment of biological age in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. Exp Gerontol 19:133–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford JP, Fruchter B (1973) Fundamental statistics in psychology and education, 5th edn. Mcgraw-hill Book Company, New York, pp 461–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman HH (1967) Modern factor analysis. Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp 68–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayflick L (1987) Biological aging theories. In: Maddox GL (ed) The encyclopedia of aging. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp 64–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofecker G, Skalicky M, Kment A, Niedermuller H (1980) Models of the biological age of the rat. I. A factor model of age parameters. Mech Ageing Dev 14:345–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram DK (1983) Toward the behavioral assessment of biological aging in the Laboratory mouse: concepts, terminology, and objectives. Exp Aging Res 9:225–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram DK (1988) Key questions in developing biomarkers of aging. Exp Gerontol 23:429–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Kannel WB, Castelli WP, Gordon T, McNamara PM (1971) Serum cholesterol, lipoproteins, and risk of coronary heart disease. The Framingham Study. Ann Intern Med 24:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Leon AS (1987) Age and other predictors of coronary heart disease. Med Sci Sports Exerc 19:159–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Mechanic D (1976) Sex, illness, illness behavior, and the use of health services. Soc Sci Med 12B:207–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Meshizuka T, Nagata A (1969) Adult physical fitness test and physical fitness status of Japanese adults. Jpn J Phys Educ 13:287–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura E, Miyao K, Ozeki T (1988) Assessment of biological age by principal component analysis. Mech Ageing Dev 46:118

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura E, Moritani T, Kanetaka A (1989) Biological age versus physical fitness age. Eur J Appl Physiol 58:778–785

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathanson CA (1977) Sex, Illness, and medical care: a review of data, theory, and method. Soc Sci Med 11:13–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Piscopo J (1985) Fitness and aging. Wiley, New York, pp 96–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Shock NW (1967) Physical activity and the “rate of ageing”. Can Med Assoc J 96:836–840

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel JS, Hoover SL (1982) Demographic aspects of the health of the elderly to the year 2000 and beyond. World Health Stat Q 35:133–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbrugge LM (1982) Sex differentials in health. Public Health Rep 97:417–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbrugge LM (1985) Gender and health: an update on hypotheses and evidence. J Health Soc Behav 26:156–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Voitenko VP, Tokar AV (1983) The assessment of biological age and sex differences of human aging. Exp Aging Res 9:239–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams BO (1985) The cardiovascular system. In: Pathy MSJ (ed) Principles and practice of geriatric medicine. Wiley, London, pp 459–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams GC (1957) Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence. Evolution 11:398–411

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (1989) Health of the eldery. Report of a WHO Expert Committee, Geneva, pp 1–98

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nakamura, E., Moritani, T. & Kanetaka, A. Biological age versus physical fitness age in women. Eur J Appl Physiol 61, 202–208 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00357600

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00357600

Key words

Navigation