Skip to main content
Log in

Competitive release in microhabitat use among coexisting desert rodents: a natural experiment

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Competitive release among desert rodents on sand dunes of differing species richness was examined in the Great Basin and Mohave Deserts, USA. Expansions in microhabitat use were exhibited by the kangaroo rats Dipodomys ordii and D. merriami (granivorous heteromyid rodents, weighing 49 and 42 g, respectively) as the number of coexisting heteromyid species decreased geographically. Perognathus longimembris, the only common small heteromyid species (7 g) exhibited no competitive release. This may be due either to the absence of competitive interactions that affect the use of space by P. longimembris or to an unacceptable increase in risk of predation that precludes the use of more open microhabitats even in the absence of kangaroo rats. The breadth of microhabitat use of an omnivorous cricetid, Peromyscus maniculatus, decreased as the density of Perognathus longimembris increased, and increased as the density of conspecifics increased. The evidence for competitive release in Dipodomys and not in Perognathus is consistent with the hypothesis that species in the same guild and of similar size compete more intensely than species of disparate size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bowers MA, Brown JH (1982) Body size and coexistence in desert rodents: chance or community structure? Ecology 63:391–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH (1973) Species diversity of seed eating desert rodents in sand-dune habitats. Ecology 54:775–787

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH (1975) Geographical ecology of desert rodents. In: Cody ML, Diamond JD (eds) Ecology and Evolution of Communities. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, pp 315–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH, Lieberman GA (1973) Resource utilization and coexistence of seed-eating desert rodents in sand-dune habitats. Ecology 54:788–797

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH, Davidson DW (1977) Competition between seed-eating rodents and ants in desert ecosystems. Science 196:880–882

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH, Munger JC (1985) Experimental manipulation of a desert rodent community: food additions and species removal. Ecology 66:1545–1563

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH, Reichman OJ, Davidson DW (1979) Granivory in desert ecosystems. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 10:201–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1980) Diversity and the coevolution of competitors, or the ghost of competition past. Oikos 35:131–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen JM (1966) The role of time and energy in food preference. Am Natur 100:611–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Everitt BS (1977) The analysis of contingency tables. Chapman and Hall, London, p 128

    Google Scholar 

  • Fretwell SD, Lucas HL (1969) On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development. Acta Biotheor 19:16–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Frye RJ (1983) Experimental evidence of interspecific aggression between two species of kangaroo rats (Dipodomys). Oecologia (Berlin) 59:74–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Frye RJ, Rosenzweig ML (1980) Clump size selection: a field test with two species of Dipodomys. Oecologia (Berlin) 47:323–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallet JG (1982) Habitat selection and the community matrix of a desert small-mammal fauna. Ecology 63:1400–1410

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutto RL (1978) A mechanism for resource allocation among sympatric heteromyid species. Oecologia (Berlin) 33:115–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler BP (1984) Risk of predation and the structure of desert rodent communities. Ecology 65:689–701

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemen CH (1978) Seed size selection in heteromyids: a second look. Oecologia (Berlin) 35:13–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemen CH, Rosenzweig ML (1978) Microhabitat selection in two species of heteromyid rodents. Oecologia (Berlin) 33:13–19

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH, Pianka ER (1966) On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am Natur 100:603–609

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ, p 203

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMahon JA (1976) Species and guild similarity of North American desert mammal fauna: a functional analysis of communities. In: Goodall DW (ed) Evolution of Desert Biota. University of Texas Press, Austin, pp 133–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Mares MA, Williams DG (1977) Experimental support for food particle size resource allocation in heteromyid rodents. Ecology 58:1186–1190

    Google Scholar 

  • M'Closkey RT (1980) Spatial patterns in sizes of seeds collected by four heteromyid rodents. Ecology 61:486–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton SR (1979) Diversity of desert-dwelling mammals: a comparison of Australia and North America. J Mammal 60:253–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Munger JC, Brown JH (1981) Competition in desert rodents: an experiment with semipermeable exclosures. Science 211:510–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Price MV (1978a) The role of microhabitat in structuring desert rodent communities. Ecology 59:910–921

    Google Scholar 

  • Price MV (1978b) Seed dispersion preferences of coexisting desert rodent species. J Mammal 59:624–626

    Google Scholar 

  • Price MV, Brown JH (1983) Patterns in morphology and resource use in North American desert rodent communities. Great Basin Natur Mem 7:117–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebar C, Conley W (1983) Interaction in microhabitat use between Dipodomys ordii and Onychomys leucogaster. Ecology 58:984–988

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichman OJ, Oberstein D (1977) Selection of seed distribution types of Dipodomys merriami and Perognathus amplus. Ecology 64:636–643

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig ML (1973) Habitat selection experiments with a pair of coexisting heteromyid rodent species. Ecology 54:111–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig ML, Winakur J (1969) Population ecology of desert rodent communities: habitat and environmental complexity. Ecology 50:558–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1971) Theory of feeding strategies. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 2:369–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroder GD, Rosenzweig ML (1975) Perturbation analysis and overlap in habitat utilization between Dipodomys ordii and Dipodomys merriami. Oecologia (Berlin) 19:9–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff DS, Boecklen W (1981) Santa Rosalia reconsidered: size ratios and competition. Evolution 35:1206–1228

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson SD (1982a) Microhabitat utilization and foraging behavior of bipedal and quadrapedal heteromyid rodents. Ecology 63:1303–1312

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson SD (1982b) Structure and species composition of desert heteromyid rodent species assemblages: effects of a simple habitat manipulation. Ecology 63:1313–1321

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitford WS (1976) Temporal fluctuations in density and diversity of desert rodent populations. J Mammal 57:351–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Wondolleck JT (1978) Forage-area separation and overlap in heteromyid rodents. J Mammal 59:510–518

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Larsen, E. Competitive release in microhabitat use among coexisting desert rodents: a natural experiment. Oecologia 69, 231–237 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377627

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377627

Keywords

Navigation