Skip to main content
Log in

Pressure distribution in the knee joint

Influence of flexion with and without ligament dissection

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biomechanical factors influencing the patterns of pressure distribution at the articular surface and the subchondral bone are suggested to be most important in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis and ostechondritis dissecans at the knee joint. Besides this, chronic joint instability is another important factor under discussion in the etiology of osteoarthritis of the knee. The patterns of pressure distribution on the femoral condyles of weight-bearing knee joints were investigated in a biostatic cadaver model. The pressure on the femoral condyles was evaluated using pressure-sensitive films with the knee in different physiological joint positions (extension, 15° and 30° flexion) with and without division of either the medial collateral ligament (MCL), the lateral collateral ligament (LCL), the MCL and the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), or the LCL and the ACL. Results showed that the location of the contact area and peak pressure depended on the joint position and stage of ligament division. Without ligament division the maximum peak pressure was always observed on the medial condyle. Only after MCL and combined MCL + ACL division did the lateral condyle show in extension a higher peak pressure than the medial condyle. Division of the LCL and LCL + ACL resulted in an increase in peak pressure on the medial condyle, particularly in flexion. The highest peak pressure of all was measured in the 30° flexion position on the medial condyle after division of the LCL. The lowest at all was found on the lateral condyle in 15° flexion after LCL division. Additional ACL division resulted in only minor further changes. These results are important for the interpretation of clinically observed factors discussed in the etiology of secondary osteoarthritis of the knee and contribute to the theory of mechanical induction of osteoarthritis and osteochondritis dissecans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. LAhmed AM, Burke DL (1983) In-vitro measurement of static pressure distribution in synovial joints: part I. J Biomech Eng 105:216–225

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andriacchi TP, Andersson GBJ, Fermier RW, Stern D (1980) A study of lower-limb mechanics during stair-climbing. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 62:749–757

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andriacchi TP, Andersson GBJ, Örtengren R, Mikosz RP (1984) A study of factors influencing muscle activity about the knee joint. J Orthop Res 1:266–275

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bandi W (1978) Zur Pathogenese der Osteochondrosis dissecans. Unfallheilkunde 81:295–298

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baratz ME, Rehak DC, Fu FH, Rudert MJ (1988) Peripheral tears of the meniscus. Am J Sports Med 16:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brown TD, Shaw DT (1984) In vitro contact stress distribution on the femur condyles. J Orthop Res 2:190–199

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bruns J, Rosenbach B (1990) Pressure distribution at the ankle joint. Clin Biomech 5:153–161

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bruns J, Volkmer M, Lüssenhop S (1993) Pressure distribution at the knee joint. Influence of varus and valgus deviation without and with ligament dissection. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 113:12–19

    Google Scholar 

  9. Campbell CJ, Ranawat CS (1966) Osteochondritis dissecans: the question of etiology. J Trauma 6:201–221

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fukubayashi T, Kurosawa H (1980) The contact area and pressure distribution pattern of the knee. Acta Orthop Scand 51:871–879

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gollehon DL, Torzilli PA, Warren RF (1987) The role of the postero-lateral and cruciate ligaments in the stability of the human knee. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 69:233–242

    Google Scholar 

  12. Grood ES, Noyes FR, Butler DL, Suntay WJ (1981) Ligamentous and capsular restraints preventing straight medial and lateral laxity in intact human cadaver knees. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]63:1257–1269

    Google Scholar 

  13. Harrington IJ (1976) A bioengeneering analysis of force actions at the knee in normal and pathologic gait. Biomed Eng 11:167–172

    Google Scholar 

  14. Harrington IJ (1983) Static and dynamic loading patterns in knee joints with deformities. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 65:247–259

    Google Scholar 

  15. Johnson F, Leitl S, Waugh W (1980) The distribution of load across the knee. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 62:346–349

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kettelkamp DB, Jacobs AW (1972) Tibiofemoral contact area — determination and implication. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 54:349–356

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lowe PJ, Saunders GAB (1975) Knee analysis: an objective method evaluating mediolateral stability in the knee. Med Biol Eng Comp 15:548–552

    Google Scholar 

  18. Maquet PGJ (1984) Biomechanics of the knee. With application to the pathogenesis and the surgical treatment of osteoarthritis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. McKellop HA, Sigholm G, Redfern FC, Doyle B, Luck JV (1991) The effect of simulated fracture-angulations of the tibia on cartilage pressures in the knee joint. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 73:1382–1391

    Google Scholar 

  20. Morrison JB (19868) Bioengineering analysis of force actions transmitted by the knee joint. Biomech Eng 3:164–170

    Google Scholar 

  21. Morrison JB (1969) Function of the knee joint in various activities. Biomed Eng 4:573–580

    Google Scholar 

  22. Morrison JB (1970) The mechanics of the knee joint in relation to normal walking. J Biomech 3:51–61

    Google Scholar 

  23. Morrison JB (1970) Bioengeneering analysis of force actions transmitted by the knee joint. Biomech Eng 3:164–170

    Google Scholar 

  24. Olmstead TG, Wevers HW, Bryant JT, Gouw GJ (1986) Effect of muscular activity on valgus/varus laxity and stiffness of the knee. J Biomech 19:565–577

    Google Scholar 

  25. Paar O, Lippert MJ, Bernett P (1986) Patellofemorale Druckund Kontaktflächenmessungen. Unfallchirurg 89:555–562

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pauwels F (1965) Gesammelte Abhandlungen zur funktionellen Anatomie des Bewegungsapparates. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pope MH, Johnson RJ, Brown DW, Tighe C (1979) The role of the musculature in injuries to the medial collateral ligament. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 61:398–402

    Google Scholar 

  28. Prodromos CC, Andriacchi TP, Galanto JO (1985) A relationship between gait and clinical changes following high tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 67:1188–1194

    Google Scholar 

  29. Radin EL, Paul IL, Lowy M (1970) A comparision of the dynamic force transmitting properties of subchondral bone and articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 52:444–456

    Google Scholar 

  30. Radin EL, Paul IL, Rose RM (1972) Role of mechanical factors in pathogenesis of primery osteoarthritis. Lancet i:519–522

    Google Scholar 

  31. Radin EL, Parker HG, Pugh JW (1973) Response of joints to impact loading III. J Biomech 6:51–57

    Google Scholar 

  32. Schipplein OD, Andriacchi TP (1991) Interaction between active and passive knee stabilizers during level walking. J Orthop Res 9:113–119

    Google Scholar 

  33. Walker PS, Hajek JV (1972) The load-bearing area in the knee joint. J Biomech 5:581–589

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bruns, J., Volkmer, M. & Luessenhop, S. Pressure distribution in the knee joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 113, 204–209 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00441833

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00441833

Keywords

Navigation